Omaha, Nebraska 2022-05-05 02:26:23 –
Studies on reducing prejudice show that by confronting someone who says or does what is perceived as a racist, that person reduces the likelihood of expressing racism in the future. .. Imagine a scenario where two people talk face-to-face and one of them makes racist comments. For example, if another person shows disapproval by saying, “It was really a racist!” Or, “I’m uncomfortable with what you just said or did,” the original speaker may feel sick and less likely to be prejudiced in the future.
We want to see how that information about prejudiced conflicts travels through people’s social networks among black, white, and Latin individuals. And I want to see if it affects their intention to face future prejudices.
-Abby Forberg, Associate Professor of Psychology
Folberg’s work takes this scenario a few steps further. The above example may look like an isolated incident between two people, but it can affect others. A third bystander may witness the interaction, or one of the original persons involved may later associate the story with someone else. In either case, these additional people are gathering information about the costs and benefits of confronting prejudice, and the lessons learned can inform their actions in future scenarios.
“It’s really the driving force for this job,” says Folberg. “We want to see how that information about the conflict of prejudices travels through the social networks of people between black, white and Latin individuals. And it confronts future prejudices. I would like to see if it affects their intentions. “
The study also looks at scenarios where no one has spoken, and how its implicit tolerance or passivity in response to racism traverses social networks.
Folberg states that group dynamics influences these scenarios. Whites often perceive white opponents to be more reliable and less self-interested than colored people, while colored people perceive white opponents to be more self-interested and less honest than black opponents. However, you may be more skeptical of the motives of the white opponents. Therefore, what constitutes a successful or effective conflict can vary from group to group. As another example, a person at the center of a group of friends can be more influential and more successful in combating prejudice than someone around the group of friends.
To conduct the investigation, Folberg and her collaborators gathered investigation data and asked questions about the last incident of this kind, how they felt, and information about the conflict through people’s social networks. We are asking people to answer questions related to information about how it spread. Folberg focuses on face-to-face conflicts, but incidents can be recounted to others in different media, such as sharing on social media and recounting stories by text or phone.
As you can imagine, mapping these networks, communications, and psychological effects can quickly become complex, and the interdisciplinary expertise of Folberg and her collaborators becomes much more important.Folberg first met Dr. Jennifer Hunt (She), Associate Professor of Gender & Women’s Studies and Psychology, University of Kentucky (UK), Ph.D. UNO student. Later, Folberg acquired a competitive postdoctoral fellow at the University of Kentucky to study under Dr. Hunt at the University of Kentucky. Together they studied the tolerance of bias, the extent to which someone thinks others have the right to their views, and found that it influences the intent of the conflict.
From there, they Dr. Judy Goldsmith (She), Professor of Computer Science in the United Kingdom. Goldsmith and her graduate student Isaac Betts (they / they) bring expertise in network dynamics to the project, while Hunt and Folberg bring expertise in the psychology of racist and prejudiced conflicts. increase.
“We are interested in investigating what kind of incidents are being explained between different race / ethnic groups, how that information is communicated, and who they are talking to. There is, “says Folberg. “For example, whites are often really uncomfortable talking about race, and it may be unlikely that they will talk to a black colleague about the racist incident they witnessed.”
Recognizing the intersecting identities and the roles they play is also an important part. In today’s society, the topic of social justice and racial equality are in the minds of many, and Folberg is pleased to contribute to the research that can be used to inform future efforts.
“Preliminary evidence suggests that bystander intervention training tends to be more effective than traditional diversity training because it provides people with real tools for responding to incidents.” Folberg says. “This work will inform the bystander intervention project and find ways to do it more effectively, for example, to reduce racism in the community or empower people to face prejudice when they witness it. Can be used for. “
Abby Folberg, Ph.D., Awarded Visionary Grant to Explore Prejudice Confrontation | College of Arts and Sciences Source link Abby Folberg, Ph.D., Awarded Visionary Grant to Explore Prejudice Confrontation | College of Arts and Sciences