Boston, Massachusetts 2020-11-20 13:05:13 –
STara Mendra sat in the parking lot of the airport in a strange city and tried to reach out to the rabbi before the procedure, seeking comfort, but it didn’t help.
Mendra lives in Massachusetts, one of the world’s leading hospitals, but was forced to travel to Denver, Colorado for abortion treatment after being diagnosed with a deadly fetus.
“For women, especially religious women, I think we often want guidance on how to deal with these situations,” she recalled that day nearly three years ago. “If you’re not trying to negotiate to reach a spiritual leader from thousands of miles away, that’s pretty easy.”
Mendra is not the only one facing such a plight. Women in Massachusetts are forced to have an abortion treatment elsewhere because even fatal fetal abnormalities are illegal in the state 24 weeks later.
After the deaths of Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Judge Amy Coney Barrett, her successor, who integrated a conservative majority on the bench, confirmed her successor to promote increased access to abortion in Massachusetts at Beacon Hill. Is attracting attention.
“There are so many issues with the balance with this new Supreme Court,” Attorney General Maura Healey told NBC10 Boston. “In my view, the legislature needs to do everything it can to enact legislation in Massachusetts or anywhere in the country that ensures women have the right to access abortion when they need it.”
If Roe v. Wade Massachusetts takes precedence over the Supreme Court, which holds the option. Opponents argue that legislation is unnecessary, but supporters warn that rights should be written by law, as the composition of state courts is subject to change.
“Obviously, just losing such a lion, such power over rights of all kinds, especially women’s rights, is a devastating blow to all of us who have named Ruth Bader Ginsburg as a hero.” Rebecca Hart Holder said. Executive Director of NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts. “But for our rights in the future, it’s a really horrifying blow.”
“Massachusetts has records in case of court changes that could threaten our rights,” said Hartholder, who retired from Chief Justice Anthony Kennedy. He sometimes pointed out a parliamentary decision to lift the ban on criminal abortion. 2018. “It’s a really important opportunity for Massachusetts to lead the nation.”
A coalition of organizations, including NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts and the Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, is pushing for the passage of the ROE Act, a bill to increase access to abortion for more than 24 weeks in the event of fatal fetal abnormalities and reduce abortion. doing. The age at which a woman between the ages of 18 and 16 needs permission from her parent or judge.
“We like to think of Massachusetts as very progressive, and in many ways it is. Access to abortion has been protected in many ways,” said Jennifer Childslo, president of PPLM. Dr. Shak said. “But there are some remaining areas that actually create barriers.”
Mendra said these barriers after becoming pregnant in April 2017, when regular growth scans by high-risk pregnant doctors turned into a diagnosis of severe and potentially fatal brain malformations in October. I knew directly. Her doctor at Beth Israel Dikones referred her to the Boston Children’s Hospital. There, a team of experts ran tests to confirm the doctor’s suspicions.
“They sat us down and said the doctor was right, and if it wanted us to end the pregnancy, they couldn’t help us because it was illegal in Massachusetts.” Mendra said.
That’s how Mendra found herself in Denver’s airport car park. Far from the comfort of her home, family, and spiritual leader.
“Obviously, having an abortion in Massachusetts wouldn’t have eliminated the sadness and pain of the situation we felt,” she said. “But you know, I’m not going to lie-I’m very angry and frustrated that I still couldn’t take care of my doctor in my state. And my family Had to leave older children behind at a time when it was very difficult for him to travel to take care of him. “
Mendra was “very lucky,” she added. She added that she was able to pay for relevant travel expenses such as last-minute flight tickets, car rentals, and reasonably comfortable hotels in light of the situation.
The issue affects disproportionately between people of color and low-income earners, said Hartholder, who “sold tens of thousands of dollars from their pockets” to travel to Chicago and New Mexico for abortion treatment. He added that there may be no way to pay. Navigate the court system for judicial bypass.
“It’s a ridiculous amount of money people expect to have,” Mendra said.
ROE law remains on the judiciary for most of the 2019-2020 sessions, despite widespread support. Amid concerns over changes in the Supreme Court’s ideology, an abortion amendment that closely reflects the bill was recently passed in the 2021 budget state legislature and Senate versions.
The decision now lands on Governor Charlie Baker’s desk.
Baker said he was not necessarily aware of the need to change the current abortion law, but did not explicitly state whether he would refuse the measure. When asked again about the matter at a press conference last week, Baker repeatedly complained about including suggestions from Republican counterparts in his spending plans.
“We share some of the misfortunes raised by many Republican members,” Baker said last week. “Putting policies into the budget means that both House and Senate leaders have said they won’t.” .. “And it’s pretty hard to argue that this isn’t the main policy initiative currently in budget.”
Opponents of the bill argue that the law is unnecessary because the abortion law currently in the book is sufficient, such as life for the Massachusetts citizens of the pro-life organization.
“We agree with the Governor when he states that the abortion law currently written in Massachusetts is helping our people,” said MCFL President Marna Maloney Flynn. Baker said he was “more selective” than the organization.
“We don’t believe it is in the best interests of federal women, girls, or babies,” Flynn said. “The law is so extensively written that it can include almost any situation in which a woman finds it challenging to her until the moment of childbirth … it makes the life of too many viable babies. Will cover. “
Senate Chair Emerita Harriette Chandler, co-sponsor of the bill, claims that the bill protects women’s right to choose without state intervention.
“Basically, it gives women the right to make their own decisions about their body with the help of a doctor,” Chandler said. “That is the most important issue we have to deal with.”
Healthcare providers, such as Dr. Tara Coomaraswamy, an obstetrician and gynecologist who has worked in central Massachusetts for over a decade, claim that state regulations do not provide complete care.
“I was able to see what women experienced and what are the barriers that really make it difficult for women to seek abortion treatment,” Coomaraswamy said. “It is important to be able to make this very personal decision between those who are willing to share this decision with their health care providers and their healthcare providers.”
Mendra, who describes herself as a personal and conservative Jewish woman, changes her state law, hoping to change the lives of women who need access to care like her. Said sharing the story.
“I have a sense of duty to the people who helped me and the women who come after me,” she said. “I have a terrible stage phobia. I hate talking in public. It’s not really fun to publish my personal obstetric history on the internet, but I find it worth it. . “
The State Capitol News Agency contributed to this report.
After Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Death, Urgency Mounts in Massachusetts Abortion Debate – NBC Boston Source link After Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Death, Urgency Mounts in Massachusetts Abortion Debate – NBC Boston