Anything that has hysteria will inflame … Secret — Part III

Image: A carrier pigeon dispatched to the leg of Sainte-Poll, France, on May 13, 1918. Source: George Lane, National Archives, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

This third and last entry in the series (see) Part I And Part II), We focus on the sometimes unpleasant balance between making money and maintaining an ethical core, a challenge facing the industry as a whole.

During the pandemic, the government greatly expanded their frustrating tendency to spy on people. In the name of controlling the spread of the virus, various agencies are seeking people’s opinions, social arrangements, personal comments, and horrific scale of movement. Combining the latest drone technology with old-fashioned gumshoe technology, many private companies and civil servants are behind.

Facebook (Nasdaq: FB) is the most obvious example of a company that prioritizes profit over ethics. That image plummeted from making a profit by reporting people’s buying and searching habits. Although basically unchecked in this area, social media giants have benefited from moving quickly and selling information to track the movements of people during a pandemic.

People know what algorithm gangs are doing. Survey in May 2021 Axios / Harris Facebook was ranked 98th out of 100 companies in terms of corporate reputation, and the image of the company was significantly reduced. It is moving from a social media giant to an anti-social media giant. I’ve been against Facebook since I started this series.

The scope of these espionage activities is breathtaking. In fact, besides Facebook, many companies benefit from searching for personal habits and social movements. This includes spying on people’s travel plans, listening to phone conversations, and surfing emails and text messages.

As a result, Facebook continues to make poor decisions, spy on private activities and receive compensation. The government has far outstripped Facebook’s efforts to force taxpayers to pay for it. Throughout, there have been no major protests or large-scale systematic efforts to stop this activity. The lonely US Post Office seems to be the only place that really has problems with espionage (opening or stealing someone’s email).

Spies are everywhere. One of the free spy products, called the Rapid Deployment Eavesdropping Kit, is designed to detect eavesdropping devices. Product names sold by indicate that a secret product is not secret. Famous double agent Kim Philby said, “Hello, I’m a spy. Can you tell me the secret?” A quick search on the Internet reveals a variety of competing products for wiretapping kits. This means that cheap spies (and must be a few) may actually negotiate at the prices of the latest spy tools.

The amazing range of US government spies jumps into dangerous words. Regular “snail” emails are exempt and protected by strict, long-term penalties, while international calls, text messages, web browsing, and email are widely scanned at a dizzying pace. A common approach is to look for “suspicious keywords.” As you would expect when using “approved” software, some keywords turn out to be funny.Article Daily mail We have listed some of the “suspicious” words that draw the attention of various browsing techniques and personnel. In addition to “al Qaeda,” “terrorism,” and “dirty bombs,” dangerous words include “bridge,” “wildfire,” and “smallpox.”

Please note. If you’re in marketing, be sure to say that your new product is “spreading like a wildfire.” Are you going to New Jersey from New York? Take the Holland Tunnel (two lanes only) to avoid the George Washington Bridge. Are you suffering from an epidemic? Make it a “big pox” instead of a small one.

Myth Buster was drafted into the US military many years ago. In a similar government way, instead of asking the draft about the Weather Underground, the military asked about the Serbo-Croatian League, a World War I relic.

This series focuses on a series of new businesses created by the explosion of James Bond counterfeit products. Sophisticated equipment scans billions of private communications. It is estimated that more than $ 100 million was spent on US government espionage between 2015 and 2019. Apparently, much of the material was already known to the FBI and other agencies.

Earlier entries in this series mentioned some of the companies that are boosting revenue through the sale of drones and other espionage equipment. Other manufacturers of spy equipment include SONY (NYSE: SONY), Gopro (Nasdaq: GPRO), Panasonic (OTC: PCRFY), and Eastman Kodak (NYSE: KODK). Consider these additional notable points.

The outline of the seabed is as follows. “Camera types include shoes, helicopters, triple heads, variable filters, bullets, through hulls, tow, push, miniatures. Monochrome camcorders, controllers, consoles / monitors, lights and DVRs are available.”

Subscribe to deliver daily fixes to your inbox 5 days a week

There is another opportunity for relatively secret communication. It is a carrier pigeon. Low tech often provides the Achilles tendon for the most intense technical activities. A quick search on the internet will bring up the carrier pigeon service in Pensacola, Florida. Of course, they use the internet, so there is no possibility of a secret. Not surprisingly, even their pigeons can’t fly thousands of miles. But this unique business offers the opportunity to “fly under the radar.” Skeptics should note that Pigeon (the real name of the company!) Is next to the Naval Air Station Pensacola. The Naval Air Station Pensacola has a very expensive stockpile of military power. But they probably can’t track those little pigeons.

The series reveals an automatic tendency to wipe out criticism when businesses and governments spy. The series also shows that bad news will eventually catch up with the organization. Next month, Myth Buster will work on a new myth in the business world.

Michael McTague, Ph.D. He is the Executive Vice President of Able Global Partners in New York, a private equity firm.


Equity Contributor: Michael McTague, PhD

Source: Equity news

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and are not necessarily the same. Readers should not consider the author’s remarks as a formal recommendation and should consult with a financial adviser before making an investment decision. To read the full disclosure, please visit:

Source link

Back to top button