A federal judge said Friday at Epic Games Inc, a contest where major tech companies gained new attention to how they manage software and applications on their platforms. He said he would appeal the verdict of the antitrust lawsuit, which has received a lot of attention.
The iPhone maker is also trying to hold an order by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the US District Court. Apple needs to relax some restrictions How App Store developers ask for online service payments.
Epic, the maker of the popular game Fortnite, has already filed a notice of appeal against the September 10 verdict issued by a federal court in Oakland, California. 16-day bench trial May. An Epic spokeswoman declined to comment on Apple’s plans for appeal.
The proceedings brought to court how companies such as Apple controlled access to users.US, European Union and later legislators and regulators I’m watching the problem carefully..
Apple has faced a deadline to file a notice of appeal. This is a routine procedure that does not include the details of the allegations for one of the ten allegations ruled by the judge.
Most of Epic’s allegations were dismissed by the judge, including the requirement that Apple be an improper monopoly in controlling the distribution of software to the iPhone and force developers to use the in-app payment system.Apple collects What Epic calls unfair fees It is as high as 30%.
Apple claimed that the rules protected users, their fees were in line with industry standards, and they were fair to the services they offered. Following the initial verdict, Apple supported the findings as an “overwhelming victory.”
Still, it wasn’t a complete victory. The judge decided that it was wrong for Apple to ban developers from sending users to different payment methods using in-app and out-of-app communication with users. She issued an injunction to force Apple to lift the ban.
Apple wants to stay in the injunction while working on the solution. The company had already agreed to a settlement allowing out-of-app communication in another case, but it’s still unclear how Apple wants to deal with in-app communication.
“The company understands and respects the court’s concerns about communication between developers and consumers,” the company said in a court filing. “Apple is careful about many complex issues throughout the global context, with the aim of enhancing the flow of information while protecting both the efficient features of the App Store and the security and privacy of Apple’s customers. It is working.”
Some statutory observers have stated that an appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals can take more than a year and is likely to eventually be filed with the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Supreme Court. increase.
Epic co-founder Tim Sweeney suggests that this process can take up to five years.Meanwhile, Apple Doesn’t allow Epic to be returned to the developer platform Until the appeal process is complete.
The court battle broke out in August 2020 when Epic sneaked in-app payments into a popular “Fortnite” video game that violated Apple’s rules. In response, Apple launched the game from the App Store, followed by Epic’s proceedings.
The incident gives Apple’s secret App Store business its own window, with about one-fifth of its operating profit in 2019. Reducing app revenueAccording to an analysis of the Wall Street Journal of court records published as part of the trial.
Apple said the numbers released were flawed and too high. Still, we admit that much of the App Store’s revenue comes from video games.
— Sarah Needleman contributed to this article.
Write to Tim Higgins Tim.Higgins@WSJ.com
Copyright © 2021 DowJones & Company, Inc. all rights reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
Appeals Apple’s notice of appeal in epic antitrust proceedings, appearing to maintain in-app injunction
Source link Appeals Apple’s notice of appeal in epic antitrust proceedings, appearing to maintain in-app injunction