Civil society groups warn: Force companies to adapt Working on legal and regulatory patchwork risks creating a more disruptive Internet where access to information and products depends on people’s whereabouts. Companies value the value of making services available in countries like Russia, which are considered more independent than local technology platforms, as Google did in China, and the cost of leaving them altogether. We need to weigh.
The pressure on Silicon Valley to block certain content on the platform isn’t just from the more authoritarian government. In the United States and Europe, policy makers want companies to do more to deal with hate speech, misinformation, and other toxic content. Republicans in the United States claim they are being censored online.
In Russia, the country’s Internet regulator, Roskomnadzor, has repeatedly demanded that companies remove certain content because of fines and the pain of restricting access to products. The government says American internet companies are interfering with Russia’s internal affairs by allowing anti-Kremlin activists to use their platform freely.
The Kremlin has recently become increasingly less willing to use the threat of arrest to prevent the use of the app. “With the participation of Apple and Google, certain crimes have been committed and their scale could increase in the coming days,” said Russian senator Vladimir Javalov. “Individuals who have contributed to avoiding liability of the parent company on the territory of the Russian Federation will be punished.”
It remains to be seen if Apple and Google’s concessions on Friday will be a watershed moment in how strongly American tech giants resist the Kremlin’s pressure. During this year’s crackdown on Russia’s opposition, the most popular Silicon Valley platform remains freely accessible, allowing journalists and activists to continue to send messages. For example, YouTube has millions of regular views, according to a survey by the Navalny team on corruption in the Russian elite.
But the Friday move could make the Kremlin, as well as other governments around the world, bold to take advantage of the threat of prosecuting employees to leverage their businesses. It presents Silicon Valley’s ideal test for free expression and the open Internet, balanced not only for profit but also for worker safety.
Removal of Facebook and Twitter posts, YouTube videos, and other Internet content occurs fairly regularly as companies seek to comply with local laws around the world. In China, Apple has removed apps that violate government censorship, such as software that allows Chinese users access to the open global Internet.Led by a 2016 court decision in Russia Apple and Google remove LinkedIn From their app store after LinkedIn did not comply with the law requiring that data about Russian users be stored within national borders.
Apple and Google remove Russia’s “Navalny” voting app
Source link Apple and Google remove Russia’s “Navalny” voting app