Tucson, Arizona 2021-08-03 19:00:00 –
Flagstaff, represented by lawyer Roopali Desai, wants to keep it that far.
They are asking judges to revoke the new state budget provisions that impose a $ 1.1 million fine on Flagstaff. This number is supposed to represent the additional costs the state will incur between the state’s $ 12.15 figure and the minimum voter $ 15 of the recruited Flagstaff.
In a new court submission, Desai disagrees with the number.
She said the Flagstaff Ordinance specifically exempts state employees. And Desai said that some of the higher-cost other claims, such as from Coconino Community College, are not really state obligations.
But at the heart of her claim is that the clause itself is unconstitutional.
Desai points out that both the initial state-wide initiative in 2006, which first established the state’s minimum wage, and the increased number of revisions in 2016, will allow local communities to establish their own wage laws. did. The only requirement is that the numbers are at least as high as the state requires.
She insists on a law requiring reimbursement, in violation of the Voter Protection Act, a constitutional provision that prohibits Congress from abolishing or changing what is approved in the ballot box.
The only exception is when the legislative act is voter-approved but “goes further”, and Desai said he would not do this, but even if it did, both the House and Senate four minutes. She said she would need three votes. , I couldn’t get it with this measure.
Arizona penalizing cities with own minimum wage; could affect Tucson vote | Local news Source link Arizona penalizing cities with own minimum wage; could affect Tucson vote | Local news