As Arizona election ‘audit’ ends, new ones begin – Boston, Massachusetts

Boston, Massachusetts 2021-09-25 14:29:00 –


No review can change the fact that Joe Biden has defeated the president.

In the photo of this file, Robin Foss, Chairman of the State Capitol, Wisconsin, speaks at the State Capitol Building in Madison, Wisconsin. In the battlefield state where former President Donald Trump lost in last year’s presidential election, Republicans’ attempts to investigate and uncover widespread fraud have received the most attention. While the embarrassing end has come to Arizona, in other states their efforts have been boosted in just one year from the mid-2022. Rickwood / Milwalky Journal-Sentinel via AP, File

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania (AP) —The most watched attempt by the Republicans to investigate the 2020 presidential election in the fierce battle state lost by former President Donald Trump in Arizona is about to end with embarrassment. But their efforts are accelerating elsewhere.

The latest is Republican-controlled Texas, where the Secretary of State announced Thursday that it will conduct a “complete and comprehensive forensic audit” of the 2020 elections in four populous counties.

These reviews have different names. It is “audit” or “investigation” and may also have the word “forensic”.

But their scope is not always clearly defined or understood, even by those pushing them, and critics say that widespread scams elect him, no matter what the review finds. He says he has one goal to test Trump’s unfounded claim that he has sacrificed.

No review can change the fact that Joe Biden has defeated the president. His victory was proved by the officials of each Swing State he won and Congress on January 6 — Trump’s supporters, fueled by the same false accusations that generated the audit, proved the election. After attacking the Houses of Parliament in an attempt to stop him.

Take a closer look at Republican election reviews.

Where are Republicans pursuing these election reviews and why?

Republicans have sought reviews in Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. These are all battlefields lost by Trump. The latest was Texas, where Trump had a winning margin of 5.5 percentage points.

Audit efforts could take place on a smaller scale, including Fulton County, Georgia, including Atlanta, individual counties in Pennsylvania and Michigan, and the Legislature in New Hampshire.

In virtually all cases, reviews began under pressure from Trump and his allies, ballots, voting machines, and electors for evidence of fraud to justify universally exposed claims. We conducted an Arizona-style survey of the roster.

In Wisconsin, one review is being conducted by the highly respected nonpartisan legislative audit agency. Another commanded by Republican chairman Robin Vos, led by a former judge at the Wisconsin Supreme Court, said conservatives had stolen elections by Trump supporters in November.

In Pennsylvania, Republicans are shrinking after the county rejected the surge in demand for voting machines, ballots, computer logs, and more in July.

A Republican-controlled Senate committee sent a subpoena to state election authorities last week on various election-related records. The Democratic Party is calling for a stop.

The latest in Texas suddenly came just hours after Trump issued a statement to Republican Governor Greg Abbott that “Texas requires an actual audit to fully address their concerns.” It was announced.

The Secretary of State had previously said the 2020 elections were “smooth and safe,” but said he would audit the four most populous counties in the state. Three voted for Biden, and the Republican Party is rapidly losing its position. The booming suburbs of Dallas.


Why do Democrats and other critics say the reviews are fake?

To begin with, Trump’s false allegations about elections stolen by widespread fraud were revealed by both Republican and Democratic judges, his own Department of Justice, and numerous recounts and audits.

The quest to uncover fraudulent elections has so far not resembled the type of audit that is widely recognized as legitimate by the professional audit community.

In Arizona, election experts cite many flaws in their reviews, from prejudiced and inexperienced contractors to conspiracy funders and strange and unreliable methods. Almost all allegations by the review team so far have collapsed under scrutiny.

Democrats say Republicans simply perpetuate Trump’s “big lie” of unfounded allegations about election fraud. They state that these claims undermine confidence in the elections, and the Republicans are on a mission to seize power by depriving them of their right to vote and weakening both democracy and elections.


Should they be called “audits”?

Experienced auditors say no.

This is because the actual election audit follows standard procedures and is carried out by experienced professionals. In Arizona, the prime contractor, Cyber ​​Ninjas, had no previous experience in election audits.

Proponents prefer to use the term “forensics” in combination with “audit” or “investigation.” However, the term “forensics” refers to the technique used to investigate crime. There is no evidence to support the allegations made by Trump and his allies, not to mention evidence of crime.

Audits must also be considered independent. However, in these cases, they were driven by one political party, and in Arizona, they were almost entirely funded by donations from Trump supporters who promoted the conspiracy theories surrounding the election.

There are also security concerns about granting access to election facilities.

Voting systems that have passed the tamper-proof test are certified by states that have CoC laws governing the security and access of voting machines. The US Election Assistance Commission certifies laboratories for testing voting machines and provides states with guidance on how to maintain a set of controls over the voting system.


What do you call the finished product?

The audit in Maricopa County, Arizona, was driven by Republicans in the state legislature and ended on a whim on Friday. The six-month process ended with a report that did not provide evidence to support Trump’s allegations of election theft and ended up verifying Biden’s victory in the state’s most populous county.

This review was widely criticized by some Republicans as being full of prejudice and incompetence.

In New Hampshire, at the request of lawmakers from both parties, auditors investigated inconsistencies in state legislative competition, but the audit found no evidence of fraud or prejudice. He concluded that the legislative miscalculation was mainly due to the absentee ballot.

Nevertheless, it drew the attention of Trump and his allies who knew how to support their false claims about the 2020 elections.

In Michigan, Republican legislative leaders resisted the Arizona-style “audit” call. Instead, they joined a Republican-led Senate committee, held a hearing on allegations, reviewed thousands of pages of subpoenas, and found reports that did not find evidence of widespread or systematic fraud. created.

“Our clear finding is that citizens should be confident that the results represent the true results of the votes cast by the people of Michigan,” the report concluded. “The Commission strongly recommends that citizens use their critical eyes and ears to those who have pushed for apparently false theories for their own personal gain.”

It did not soften the playing cards. The former president continues to ask lawmakers for another review.


How much does a taxpayer cost?

In Arizona, a Republican-controlled Senate (which commissioned an “audit” and hired a prime contractor) kicked $ 150,000 in taxpayer money. But it was dwarfed by the $ 5.7 million disclosed in July raised by prominent Trump supporters to fund the effort.

Maricopa County, including Phoenix, will spend $ 3 million to replace the ballot-counting machine after it has been determined to have been infringed by a Republican audit.

In Wisconsin, the budget for audits commissioned by the Republican Chair is $ 680,000 in taxpayer money. Auditing in New Hampshire cost more than $ 123,000, but the law approving it didn’t include the money to pay it.

Pennsylvania and Texas officials haven’t said how much it will cost or who will perform the audit.

Associated Press writers Scott Bauer of Madison, Wisconsin, Christina A. Cassidy of Atlanta, David Egert of Lansing, Michigan, Holly Lamar of Concord, New Hampshire, and Paul J. Weber of Austin, Texas contributed to this report.

As Arizona election ‘audit’ ends, new ones begin Source link As Arizona election ‘audit’ ends, new ones begin

Back to top button