Baltimore

As Mosby defense fund website goes mostly blank, Baltimore Council members explain stances on ethics concerns – Baltimore Sun – Baltimore, Maryland

Baltimore, Maryland 2022-05-16 18:46:34 –

A website set up to raise funds for the legal defense of Baltimore City Council President Nick Mosby and state lawyer Marilyn Mosby outlines some of the city’s ethical code violations from the Baltimore Ethics Board. It has been almost blank since the announcement of the decision last week. Chairman of the council.

Websites that now display “Maintenance mode is on” and have no links previously advertised fundraising activities to support the bill of a couple of political powers.

A former trustee of the Mosby 2021 Trust, a tax-exempt political organization associated with the Legal Defense Fund, said the trust is in the process of dissolution.

Robin Murphy, the trustee at the time the fund was founded and then abandoned his duties, said Monday that the process of closing the trust was underway for some time. The current trustee of the fund has not been nominated. Murphy said the person did not want to speak publicly.

According to the Institutional Review Board, the Chairman of the Council has violated several city ethics laws by indirectly soliciting and accepting donations from two city contractors through the Legal Defense Fund.

Baltimore’s Code of Ethics allows city officials to solicit or receive money directly or indirectly from “managed donors,” a category that includes city contractors and many other people who do business with the city. It is forbidden to do.

In the case of Nick Mosby, who presides over the city council and the city’s estimation committee, the managed donor is seen as a person seeking to do business with the city council, the presidential palace of the city council, the estimation committee, or the city’s government agency or quasi-city. Will be done. -The government agency to which the chairman of the council belongs. It also includes subcontractors who have or wish to do business with the above groups and who are engaged in activities regulated or controlled by those groups.

According to the Institutional Review Board, the Legal Defense Fund received the largest personal donation of $ 5,000 in August from a “resident agent” of a contractor, a city-certified minority or female-owned company. .. The project was a subcontractor of the transaction considered by the city’s spending committee in 2020, the committee reported.

The fund also received a $ 100 donation from the Managing Director of a nonprofit organization that was awarded a grant of thousands of dollars from the city in March.

The Institutional Review Board tells Nick Mosby to return the money collected from managed donors, stop funding activities, and instruct the fund organizers to provide the Institutional Review Board with a list of fund donors. I ordered. The board gave him 30 days to obey orders or face a $ 1,000 daily penalty.

Nick Mosby denied violating the Code of Ethics and repeated his defense on Monday. The council chairman said he would follow orders from the ethics board, but said he had no money to return.

“I have no money to repay,” he said. “There was no money given.”

“If I read page 17 clearly, I had nothing to do with it. At this point, it’s time to move on,” he said. “I will follow any provisions they require of me.”

On Saturday, six members of the Baltimore City Council sent a letter to Nick Mosby calling for him to obey his orders. Members of the council, which make up less than half of the 15 committees, said the ethics committee’s report “unquestionably made it clear” that the council chairman violated the city’s ethics law. ..

“We write to express to you the results of the Institutional Review Board’s findings in the investigation of the Mosby Trust you are beneficiary and our disappointment with your financial disclosure,” said a letter from a city council member. increase.

The letter was signed by Councilors Christapher Burnett, Sieg Cohen, Ryan Dorsey, Filicia Porter, Odette Ramos, and James Torrens. Last month’s council room.

On Monday, some members of the city council who chose not to sign the letter quoted concerns about the timing and language of the letter. According to an email obtained by The Baltimore Sun, a draft letter was circulated to council members by email at 3:16 pm on Friday by six signatory members. Interested council members were asked to sign on by 5:15 pm that night.

Councilor Mark Conway said he had not yet read the 17-page report from the Institutional Review Board on Monday afternoon, and was worried about signing it.

“I had some initial concerns about language, language sensitivity,” Conway said. “For now, I didn’t think it was the right thing to do for me.”

Conway said he chose to speak directly with the council chairman instead.

“I told him it was essential to deal with the situation,” Conway said. “It’s a distraction from the important work we have to do. This won’t help us with anything.”

Conway said Nick Mosby told him he had adhered to almost everything in order, but one part hasn’t been dealt with yet, Conway recalled.

Maryland Policy and Politics

weekday

Stay up-to-date on Maryland’s political, elections, and important decisions made by federal, state, and local government officials.

“I told him in so many words,’You believe you meet that requirement, and the Institutional Review Board believes it, it’s two different things.'” Said Conway.

Councilor Isaac “Izzi” Schleifer said his decision not to sign came down to timing. He said the council members who coordinated the letter never spoke to him directly. Schleifer said he hadn’t seen the letter until it appeared in the news coverage on Saturday.

However, Schleifer refused to comment on his allegations against Mosby.

Councilor John Brock said he didn’t think the letter was necessary.

“From my point of view, the report looked pretty simple in terms of what the council chairman needed to do,” Brock said.

Brock said he hadn’t talked to Mosby since the ethical decision was announced. Mr. Brock said he would get a sense from members of the council who did not sign the letter, giving the chairman of the council time to obey orders.

“This decision shows what needs to happen,” he said. “If that doesn’t happen, it’s something the council can see.”

As Mosby defense fund website goes mostly blank, Baltimore Council members explain stances on ethics concerns – Baltimore Sun Source link As Mosby defense fund website goes mostly blank, Baltimore Council members explain stances on ethics concerns – Baltimore Sun

Back to top button