Pittsburgh

Bill Cosby prosecutors take case to US Supreme Court – Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 2021-11-29 16:49:00 –

The prosecution has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider the decision that overturned Bill Cosby’s sexual assault conviction, setting a dangerous precedent if the press release is treated as an exemption agreement in Monday’s petition. Insisted that there was a possibility. Cosby’s lawyer has long claimed that he is dependent on promises. He would never be prosecuted when he gave a damaging testimony in a whistleblower’s civil proceedings in 2006. Bruce Caster said there wasn’t enough evidence to arrest Cosby. This release contained an ambiguous “caution” for casters to “rethink this decision when needed.” Both parties have spent years discussing what that means since then. Steele wrote in a motion for Supreme Court review under the legitimate procedural provisions of the US Constitution. Prosecutors also complain that the Supreme Court justice of the State High Court appears to have misrepresented important facts in the case when discussing the court’s decision. A television interview overturned Cosby’s beliefs. Caster’s successor, who arrested Cosby for gathering new evidence in 2015, said it was far less than a lifetime immunity agreement. They also suspect that Castor has ever made such a deal. Instead, Cosby said that even if he backfired when he “slipped” with his rambling testimony, there was a strategic reason to give him a testimony instead of exercising his right to remain silent. Says. Cosby, 84, was the first celebrity to be convicted of sexual assault during the #MeToo era when a jury pleaded guilty to drug and molester to college sports manager Andrea Constant in a 2018 retrial. became. He spent nearly three years in prison before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court released him in June. Steel’s bid to revive the case is not a big deal. The US Supreme Court accepts less than 1% of petitions received. However, legal scholars and victim advocates are closely watching whether the court is interested in the hottest #MeToo case. Two judges in court, Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh, were accused of sexual misconduct during a fierce battle. Confirmation hearing. The Appeal Judge expressed a very different view of the Cosby case. An intermediate state court upheld the conviction. Seven judges of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court then wrote three separate opinions. The majority found that when Cosby admitted that he had given a series of young women medicine and alcohol before a sexual encounter, he relied on a decision not to prosecute him. The court did not admit that there was such an agreement, but Cosby said he believed there was such an agreement. They say Cosby’s lawyer violently opposed the testimony-taking question rather than letting him speak freely. Cosby himself has never testified to any agreement or promise. The only participant allegedly mentioned earlier is Steele’s political rival, Caster, who continued to represent President Donald Trump in the second impeachment trial. Caster said he had promised Cosby’s dead defense lawyer, but said he had received no reward, but never mentioned Lisa Farman, the top assistant who led Cosby’s investigation. She later became a district attorney and resumed the case in 2015. After a federal judge opened Cosby’s testimony record. At a notable pretrial hearing in February 2016, Caster spent hours giving his defense testimony. He said he typed a press release himself after business hours, which was intended to convey a different layer of meaning to lawyers, the media, and the general public. The judge decided he was unreliable and sent the case to trial. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s June 30 ruling called Cosby’s arrest an “insult to basic impartiality.” A few weeks later, the ruling urged the State Attorney General to dismiss charges against prison guards accused of sexually abusing female prisoners in a previous agreement with the county prosecutor. Breakthrough black actor and comedian The Cosby founded the top-ranked “The Cosby Show” in the 1980s. The barrage of alleged sexual assaults later destroyed his image as an “American dad” and led to a multi-million dollar court reconciliation with at least eight women. However, Constant was the only case leading to criminal accusations, and five of them testified to prosecution in support of Constant’s allegations that Cosby’s lawyers also challenged the appeal. However, the state high court refused to address the thorny issue of the number of other whistleblowers who could testify in criminal cases before the evidence became unfair to the defense. In a recent memoir, Constant said the verdict was less important than the growing support for survivors of sexual assault. “The outcome of the trial seemed strangely unimportant, as if the world were even more important. It was as if it had changed again in an important way, “Constant wrote in the book, The Moment.

The prosecutor told the US Supreme Court, Overturned Bill Cosby’s conviction for sexual assaultThe petition on Monday argues that dangerous precedents could be set if the press release is treated as a disclaimer.

Cosby’s lawyers have long argued that when he gave a damaging testimony in a whistleblower’s civil proceedings in 2006, he relied on a promise that he would never be prosecuted.

The only written evidence of such a promise was a 2005 press release from then-prosecutor Bruce Caster, who stated that there was not enough evidence to arrest Cosby.

This release contained an ambiguous “caution” that Castor would “reconsider this decision if necessary.” Since then, both parties have spent years discussing what that means.

“This decision as it stands will have widespread adverse effects beyond Montgomery County and Pennsylvania. The US Supreme Court can correct what we believe to be a serious mistake,” said the Montgomery County District. Court lawyer Kevin Steele wrote in a petition for the Supreme Court. A review under the Due Process Clause of the US Constitution.

The prosecution also complained that when discussing the court’s decision to overturn Cosby’s conviction in a television interview, the Supreme Court justice of the State High Court appeared to misrepresent important facts in the case. ing.

Caster’s successor, who gathered new evidence and arrested Cosby in 2015, says it falls far short of a lifetime immunity agreement. They also suspect that Castor has ever made such a deal. Instead, they say that even if Cosby backfired when “he slipped” in his rambling testimony, he had a strategic reason to give a deposit instead of exercising his right to remain silent. increase.

However, the defense lawyer states that the proceedings should never have been brought to justice because they called it a “non-indictment agreement.”

Cosby, 84, was the first celebrity to be convicted of sexual assault during the #MeToo era when a jury pleaded guilty to drug and molester to college sports manager Andrea Constant in a 2018 retrial. became.

He spent nearly three years in prison before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court released him in June.

Steel’s bid to revive the case is a long shot. The US Supreme Court accepts less than 1% of petitions received. However, legal scholars and victim advocates are closely watching whether the court is interested in the hottest #MeToo case.

Two court judges, Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh, were accused of sexual misconduct at a confirmation hearing of a fierce conflict.

The Appeal Judge expressed a very different view of the Cosby case. An intermediate state court upheld the conviction. Next, seven judges from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court wrote three separate opinions.

The majority found that when Cosby admitted that he had given a series of young women drugs and alcohol before a sexual encounter, he relied on a decision not to prosecute him. The court did not admit that there was such an agreement, but said Cosby thought it was there-they said that trust broke his belief.

However, prosecutors call the conclusion flawed. They say Cosby’s lawyer violently opposed the testimony-taking question rather than letting him speak freely.

Cosby himself has never testified to any agreement or promise. The only participant allegedly mentioned earlier is Steele’s political rival, Caster, who continued to represent President Donald Trump in the second impeachment trial. Caster said he had promised Cosby’s dead defense lawyer, but received no reward.

He never mentioned it to top assistant Lisa Farman, who led the investigation into Cosby.

She later became a district attorney and resumed the case in 2015 after a federal judge opened Cosby’s testimony record.

At a notable preliminary hearing in February 2016, Caster spent hours giving his defense testimony. He said he typed a press release himself after business hours, which was intended to convey a different layer of meaning to lawyers, the media, and the general public.

The judge decided he was unreliable and brought the case to trial.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court, in a June 30 ruling, called Cosby’s arrest a “fundamental insult to justice.”

A few weeks later, the ruling prompted the state prosecutor to dismiss charges against prison guards accused of sexually abusing female prisoners.

A groundbreaking black actor and comedian, The Cosby created the top-ranked “The Cosby Show” in the 1980s. The barrage of alleged sexual assaults later destroyed his image as an “American dad” and led to a multi-million dollar court reconciliation with at least eight women. However, constant was the only case leading to criminal accusations.

Five of them testified about the indictment in support of Constant’s allegations, and that Cosby’s lawyers also challenged the appeal. However, the state high court refused to address the thorny issue of the number of other whistleblowers who could testify in criminal cases before the evidence became unfair to the defense.

In a recent memoir, Constant called the verdict less important than the growing support for survivors of sexual assault inspired by the #MeToo movement.

“The outcome of the trial seemed strangely unimportant, as if the world had changed again in a more important way,” Constant wrote in the book The Moment.

Bill Cosby prosecutors take case to US Supreme Court Source link Bill Cosby prosecutors take case to US Supreme Court

Back to top button