City Council again denies subdivision plat – Washington Daily News – Washington, District of Columbia

Washington, District of Columbia 2021-06-15 20:22:29 –

Developers trying to turn a real estate house in Washington’s abandoned racket club into a single-family home after the Washington City Council rejected a revised version of the reserve parcel that was rejected in April frustrated the city hall on Monday. It was.

Councilor Betsy Kane was absent from the meeting on Monday, and Mayor Donald Sadler withdrew from the agenda, as he had done in all previous discussions and votes related to Powell Place. As a result, William Pitt, Virginia Finaly, Mike Ren, and Mayor of Protem Richard Brooks needed to discuss preliminary plans and make decisions. The council voted 3-1 in favor of Len’s motion to reject the planning committee’s unanimous recommendation to approve Pratt. After that, Finaly’s motion to accept the recommendation took less than a second.


Bill and Dale Peel have owned this property since 2003. Recently it was used as a racket club and was in operation until 2017. After leasing the property temporarily, Peeles closed the racket club due to the small number of members.

In April, they came to the city council with Powell Place, a reserve parcel of an 18-lot single-family residential parcel, built on a former racket club property near the corner of Avon Avenue and Atkins Drive. ..

Most of the properties are for zone offices and industrial use. The rest are zone homes.

At its April meeting, some people told the city council not to approve preliminary platforms because of concerns about compliance with city regulations, neighborhood density, and potential for increased traffic. ..

To address density concerns, Bill Peel said the platform originally contained 22 lots, but has been reduced to 18 lots. On traffic issues, Inner Banks Engineering’s Marie Peedin found that a quick traffic survey revealed that about 800 vehicles were driving on Avon Avenue every day. This is less than Brick Kiln Road (3,600) and comparable to Smau Road (600).

Kane pointed out two compartments that diverged from the proposed cul-de-sac of Pratt. One of those compartments was previously branched so that it could only be accessed via a connection to the Macswoods subdivision’s Camelia Drive. Camellia Drive does not meet the city’s current subdivision ordinance.

Finnerty finally sought parcel approval, provided that the two parcels were combined and both were accessible from within Powell Place. The motion eventually failed with 2-3 votes.

“What is the rationale for when they are told they are following the rules, did they do everything they were supposed to do? You need to know,” Finati said. “I don’t know. It’s very frustrating to me to see people trying to do something right next to this town. They do everything they’re supposed to do, and you Sit here and say no to them. “

1 month later

Peals came back to the city council in May to inform him that lawyers were representing them.

Bill Peel has submitted two versions of the petition for Powell Place’s fragmentation to the city council. One version submitted to the Planning Commission in February 2021 contains the signatures of Mayor Donald Sadler and his wife, Alice Mills Sadler, who live in the neighboring neighborhood. The second version, submitted to the city council in April, has Donald Sadler’s signature painted white.

Bill Peel sought guidance from the city council. City lawyer Franz Holscher advised the council not to respond, given that a lawyer who was not present at the meeting represented Peeles.

Second trial

On Monday, Peeles submitted to the city council a revised version of the preliminary platform that was rejected in April. The planning committee unanimously approved the revised platform.

The revised platform contained 17 lots. The two fragmented plots that Kane mentioned in April have been merged into one space that can be used as a recreation area if the city decides to buy.

The original platform had only one entrance and one exit. At the request of the Planning Committee, a second entrance and exit along Avon Avenue has been added to the revised proposal.

Plan manager Glen Moore pointed out that the preliminary plots did not meet some of the city’s minor subdivision criteria. One is that the length between intersections must not be more than 300 feet. If there is a second entrance / exit on Avon Avenue, that cannot be achieved.

“There were some questions about how the lane markings intersect the streets,” Moore said. “In the code, it has to match at right angles. This is a big requirement, but in the real world, if there are curves or objects on the street, it’s very difficult to do it over and over again.

“So, in the staff’s opinion, it meets the purpose and intent of the ordinance,” he added.

Bill Peel addressed the city council after the presentation, stating that the developers had filed a proceeding against the city after the first version of the parcel was rejected in April. They dismissed the proceedings in May and decided to re-execute the planning process “in good faith.”

Alice Phillips was on the podium and said she was speaking on behalf of the neighbors around the property. She claimed that her neighbor was still against Powell Place’s proposal.

Brooks followed Sadler’s counterargument and sought a motion to accept or reject the recommendation that the Planning Commission approve Pratt. Finnerty moved for approval.

After hearing immediately, Finaly once again expressed her frustration.

“Also, as before, I must say that no one asks a question and doesn’t understand that no one has a comment, but you still refuse this,” Finati said. I did. “It’s kind of daunting to me. I just want to clarify.”

Len then urged to deny the request on the grounds of “violation of applicable specific criteria of the city’s subdivision ordinance, including but not limited to those emphasized by city officials.” Inconsistency with general standards … Included in the city’s subdivision ordinance. This includes, but is not limited to, public safety, traffic density and welfare issues. Alternatively, this fragmentation can adversely affect the characteristics of existing developments in the surrounding landowners, neighboring communities, and neighboring areas. “

Next step

Bill Peel said he was waiting to talk to a lawyer on Tuesday morning before deciding what to do next.

“I think we lacked respect for our abilities,” he said. “They just want to do what they want to do and want someone to do it, but they don’t own the property. They haven’t offered to buy it.

“The problem is people who own real estate, pay taxes, and pay mortgages to manage their business, and they don’t seem to respect it,” Peel added. “That’s what the mayor and his wife want — and I think neighborhood homeowners are upset by it.”

City Council again denies subdivision plat – Washington Daily News Source link City Council again denies subdivision plat – Washington Daily News

Back to top button