Denver, Colorado 2021-09-18 00:09:42 –
Denver — Colorado Republicans will decide on Saturday whether to cancel the primary elections and move to a caucuses system instead.
The debate stems from the 2016 decision by Coloradans to allow nonpartisan voters to participate in the party’s primaries.
Proposal 108 allowed nonpartisan voters to send both Republican and Democratic primaries. Voters can then choose one primary to join. If you return both ballots, you will get a discount on both.
This voting block is largely important throughout the state and its impact is widespread.
Robert Preuse, Dean of the Department of Political Science at Denver Metropolitan University, said: “This is actually the largest single-voting block in Colorado from the perspective of registered voters.”
However, some Republicans are concerned that the semi-open primary will have external implications in deciding which candidate will ultimately be selected.
Therefore, on Saturday, the Republican Central Committee, which consists of about 500 people, will vote on whether to cancel the party’s primary elections. This group consists of officials elected throughout the state and members selected by individual counties.
Rep. Dave Williams of R-El Paso is one of the voices driving a break from the main process.
“Open primaries are notorious for Republicans,” Williams said. “You run the risk of allowing other major parties to interfere with the nomination process and open the door to weaker candidates in the general election.”
He likened the idea of the Las Vegas Raiders coming in and choosing who would be Denver Broncos’ first quarterback, and in the two primary since 2016, leftist organizations are spending money to influence the results. Say you are spending.
“You have dark money outside the group that comes in to influence who the candidates are and spends hundreds of millions of dollars, and they target them to these nonpartisan voters. Do it by marketing. “
Another concern is that nonpartisan voters choose candidates who are the least representative of the party platform and are more modest or willing to agree with the ideas of the other side.
Williams is worried that this process could undermine the potential of more conservative candidates such as himself and Congressman Lauren Boebert.
But other Republicans disagree, saying that the current key process should remain the same.
Senator Chris Holbert of R-Douglas said he doesn’t like semi-open primaries, but he doesn’t want Republican voters to lose the ability to consider who the party’s candidates are.
If the primary is canceled, a group of representatives will be elected to attend parliament to select candidates for the party.
“Independents aren’t allowed to vote, and Republicans don’t have the option of allowing them to vote,” Holbert said. “I have a responsibility to represent more than one million registered Republican voters in the state. It is not 500 people who make this decision, but more than one million Republican registrants living in Colorado. They. Make sure you have the right to vote next June. “
Williams disagrees with this and states that if people are interested in participating in the process, they are welcome to switch political parties.
He sees no problems with representatives choosing candidates on behalf of Republican voters. Because they have the opportunity to consider who the constituency leaders and representatives are.
“There is a clear line of demarcation here. There are established high-value consultants and party bosses who oppose softouts, and it is that they are still paid for the wins and losses they open in the primary elections. “Because we support.” Williams said.
Republican Rep. Kenbak is also opposed to canceling the primary. He believes the debate is worth the effort within the party, but he believes this is an important moment for the Republican Party.
“In my opinion, opting out of the primary is a bad move, as this is an important time in American history. Withdrawal from Afghanistan failed, border crises, inflation, and I have so many problems that I believe the Republicans need to unite and offer better options, “says Buck.
Preuhs, on the other hand, states that canceling primaries can have a significant impact on the nomination process, as the types of people attending caucuses are different from primaries.
Usually, the people who attend the caucuses, I tend to be much more involved in party politics, but more ideological and perhaps even leaning to the right.
The challenge is to get rid of nonpartisan voters from the nomination process and then appeal to them.
“Primaries involve voters, so without them, you’re missing out on the opportunity to actually reach out. This is a clue for nonpartisan voters to think about Republican candidates. It’s a thing, “says Preuhs.
Preuhs says that those who vote for Primary are more likely to participate in general elections and want to know how the candidates they choose will behave.
However, in reality, turnout in primaries is generally low, and nonpartisan voters are less likely to participate. Preuhs says many independent voters may not even be aware that they have been excluded.
There is also a very steep threshold for the Republican Central Commission to reach to cancel the primary. Proposal 108 stipulates that at least 75% of the entire Commission must agree with the move, otherwise it will fail.
Holbert believes that instead of canceling the primary, the parties should discuss the possibility of a legal objection to the constitutionality of Proposal 108. Williams agrees that the proceedings are the logical next step.
For Preuhs, intra-party debates and divisions like what is happening in the Republican Party are not necessarily new, but these debates can play an important role in shaping the future.
Colorado’s GOP to vote on canceling its primary Source link Colorado’s GOP to vote on canceling its primary