Other experts have stated that this scenario is not only plausible, but also likely.
“The overall intellectual structure of the treatise I fully agree with,” said Shane Crotti, a virologist at the Lahora Institute of Immunology in San Diego.
If the vaccine prevents people from being infected with the virus, “it will be very similar to the measles scenario of vaccination of everyone, including children, and the virus is already seen to infect people. No, “Dr. Crotti said.
Vaccines are more plausible in preventing disease, but they do not always prevent infection and infection, he added. And that means that the coronavirus continues to circulate.
“It is unlikely that the vaccines we have today will provide sterile immunity,” said Jennifer Gommerman, an immunologist at the University of Toronto.
Natural infections with the coronavirus cause a strong immune response in the nose and throat. However, with the current vaccine, Dr. Gommerman said, “The actual upper respiratory tract does not have a natural immune response and is being injected into the arm.” This increases the likelihood of infection after vaccination.
Ultimately, Dr. Labine’s model is based on the assumption that the new coronavirus resembles the common cold coronavirus. But that assumption may not be upheld, warned Mark Lipsich, an epidemiologist at Harvard University of Public Health in Boston.
“Other coronavirus infections may or may not be applicable because we haven’t seen what these coronaviruses can do for older naive people,” Dr. Lipsic said. (Naive refers to an adult whose immune system is not exposed to the virus.)
Coronavirus resembles a cold, scientists predict
Source link Coronavirus resembles a cold, scientists predict