Court’s Video Prohibition Sparks Social Media Misinformation – Omaha, Nebraska

Omaha, Nebraska 2021-12-03 06:00:00 –

When Jeffrey Epstein’s former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell’s sexual trafficking trial began on Monday, social media users banned the press from the courtroom and sent a live stream to protect details from disclosure. It was spreading false claims that it was banned.

In a famous case, Maxwell has been accused of recruiting and grooming girls for Epstein. Epstein committed suicide after being arrested on suspicion of his own sex trafficking.

Maxwell’s proceedings followed Kyle Rittenhouse’s trial in Wisconsin State Court and aired live. And some online conspiracy theorists seem to believe that the lack of a camera in Maxwell’s court proves that there is a larger cover-up.

But how the U.S. federal court alleged that the judge in Ghislaine Maxwell issued a media-wide gag order on the trial without a live stream to prevent scandalous details from leaking to the public. It lacks a basic understanding of how it operates.

Members of the media can see Maxwell’s trial. However, federal courts do not allow cameras like some state courts, and the disagreement fuels social media confusion and conspiracy theories.

By the time of the trial, the news that the case was not livestreamed began to spread on social media. Some users compared it to the fully aired Rittenhouse trial. Over the weekend, users claimed that the judge issued a media “gag order” in the case, banning the press from attending.

But reporters and the general public can see the trial live, both in court and in the overflow room, which is streamed for those who haven’t reserved a seat, Judge Allison Nathan said on November 24. I wrote in. Judgment.

An Associated Press reporter was in court for part of Monday’s day. In the photos taken by AP, we also saw journalists waiting to enter court.

A federal law firm in the South District of New York confirmed in a statement released Monday that the press was allowed to attend the trial and that there was no live feed except in court. In addition, no dial-in telephone line will be provided to listen to the minutes, the agency said.

According to experts, this is the standard for federal court trials, and only sketches in court are displayed.

“Camera is not allowed in federal court. There is no live stream or television broadcast,” Jennifer Rogers, a lecturer at Columbia Law School, told AP. “This is a rule for all federal courts across the country. There is nothing suspicious about it.”

“This is not a dark plot,” said Jane Cartley, a professor of media law at the University of Minnesota. “I want a camera in all these cases, but it’s a battle that has been going on for over 20 years.”

Gag order to the media is not easy and rarely happens, Cartley said. “It takes a lot of money to meet the constitution,” she said.

Court’s Video Prohibition Sparks Social Media Misinformation Source link Court’s Video Prohibition Sparks Social Media Misinformation

Back to top button