After several hours Gavin Newsom Democrats in California have vowed to defeat the historic scallops that could sacrifice his work and reform the system so that they can challenge the incumbent governor.
Changes include increasing the number of signatures required to force a scallop, raising standards requiring executive misconduct, and replacing low turnout officials with the state’s highest-elected officials. May include process changes that allow.
“I think the recall process has been weaponized,” Newsom said the day after the decisive victory.
According to Newsom, the recall rules affect not only the governor, but also the school board, city council, county supervisors, and district attorneys, especially in Los Angeles and San Francisco, where progressive prosecutors with reform agendas recall. Facing the efforts of.
Governor California Has one of the lowest thresholds in the country for the number of signatures required to trigger a call election. In the case of Newsom, the organizers had to collect nearly 1.5 million signatures from 22 million registered voters in California to expel him. That’s 12% of the voters who voted for him in 2018. In contrast, Kansas requires 40%.
However, in the face of opposition from those who organized the national dismissal elections against Newsom and questions from experts, California law limits many other laws in limiting the requirements that make it difficult for politicians to dismiss. Said it was better than.
“They work against the will of people when they take such actions to limit our autonomy,” said Orrin Heatlie, a key supporter of the recall effort.
There is little benefit Democratic Party Recall expert and senior researcher at the Hugh L. Carey Government Reform Institute in New York, Joshua Spivak, said he was pushing for changes that could offend voters.
“From a political point of view, it’s a kind of madness, and I can’t imagine why they spend political capital on it,” Spibak said. “Are you going to go to the voters and say,’I didn’t address the homelessness issue, but fixed the recall?'” I don’t think it’s a wise move. “
Newsum said he was too close to the recalled process, which he might face another attempt at some point, and did not mention the changes he preferred.
Other Democrats were more specific.
“We can’t remember that California’s minorities, minorities, and minorities couldn’t create, and California taxpayers spent nearly $ 300 million, frankly distracting, We need to create a system that actually affects our capabilities. We will rule for nine months, “said Congressman Mark Berman.
State Senator Josh Newman, who was recalled in 2018 before regaining seats two years later, said he would propose two constitutional amendments.
Berman, who heads the election panel in each constituency, and Stephen Glazer, a state senator, will hear bipartisan hearings in the coming months with the goal of proposing a constitutional amendment after the members are reconvened in January. I promised a meeting. Changes to the recall law require voter approval.
The two election committees will consider recall laws in other states and hear from experts on the California process. “It’s undemocratic and there’s really no other way to say it,” he said. “I want to make sure there’s a system that can’t recall the governor and replace it with someone,” he said. ..
According to Glazer, 19 states have some sort of recall process, but only Colorado has a similar two-step process. The California system first asks voters if they want to remove the incumbent. Second, if the majority favors the removal, the candidate with the most votes in the second question will be the governor. Forty-six candidates participated in the vote in this week’s race.
In the majority of other recall states, he said, the only issue with ballots was whether civil servants should be recalled. If the majority of voters answer “yes”, the office will be declared vacant and will be filled by appointment or another special election.
The change has the support of two leaders of the California State Legislature, both Democrats, and their party accounts for a two-thirds majority in both legislatures. However, the state constitution enshrined the recall process in 1911, leaving the final decision to voters.
“This is a system that was set up about a century ago and must definitely be considered as long as it is still valid in its current form,” said Congressional speaker Anthony Rendon.
Democratic Party of California vows to change “weaponized” recall system | California
Source link Democratic Party of California vows to change “weaponized” recall system | California