Europe proposes to ban internal combustion engine vehicles by 2035

Last week, the European Union proposed banning the sale of all new internal combustion engine vehicles from 2035. With some Member States proposing restrictions over the next few years, EU leaders feel they can accelerate the timeline for forcing electric vehicles as a de facto means of transportation. The European Commission has proposed to make the sale of gasoline or diesel vehicles illegal in 14 years with the aim of reducing CO2 emissions from automobiles by 55% (2021 level) by 2030. I will.

However, countries that are still producing vehicles have announced reservations on the schedule. France fully agrees to mandate regulations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. President Emmanuel Macron’s office insists that hybrid vehicles will be able to do a lot of hard work, fearing that a complete ban on internal combustion engines could disrupt the industry if it’s too early. .. Germany, which manufactures more cars than other EU member states, has a similar idea.

“I think all car and truck makers are aware of the coming of tighter specifications, but they must be technically feasible,” explains German Transport Minister Andreas Scheuer. Did. Deutsche Presse-Agentur (DPA).

German manufacturers are suggesting a move to EVs that are bigger than almost anyone. However, local regulators have expressed concern about accelerating timeframes. This is especially true for shoeers who remain concerned about what they can actually achieve. He proposed phasing out fossil fuel combustion by 2035 only if synthetic fuels could be completed to the extent that they would not drive the ICE off the road.

Synthetic fuels are not energy efficient enough to produce with confidence, and there are concerns that they will ultimately cause more pollution than battery-powered vehicles. However, this depends entirely on how advanced both technologies are and how the infrastructure is set up. For example Germany’s aversion to nuclear power has led Germany to build a number of coal-fired power plants To offset the renewable resources that ultimately degraded the air quality. Procuring electricity from areas that rely on coal is not good for the environment, especially if the area needs to build thousands of EV charging points to make it possible. In contrast, synthetic fuels can use existing fuel supply infrastructure. However, they suffer from some of the common pitfalls of hydrogen generation (a significant reduction in efficiency during production) and still rely on access to fossil fuels.

Unfortunately, research tends to support what is outsourced to the industry in the first place.Although there is ample evidence to suggest the most environmentally friendly solution Tend To be the most localized. Battery manufacturing (or disposal) is not always environmentally friendly and is not shipped worldwide. And the same applies to fuel refining. Excavating crude oil, refining it, and sending it back to half of the world for return unnecessarily increases carbon dioxide emissions. However, it is a fairly common practice in developed countries.

These issues are often more about awareness and finance than actually deciding what is possible or which technology / practice minimizes the total amount of pollution. This is often embodied by the blind belief that environmental activists put the EV on the EV and open a courtroom on the EV, leaving the internal combustion engine permanently on the deck.

“This is like the EU’s shortage of expectations in recent years,” said Helen Clarkson, CEO of Climate Group, a non-profit organization that works openly with businesses and governments. Complex and ethical slurry, Reuters..

“Science says it’s easy for road transport, as emissions need to be halved by 2030. Eliminate internal combustion engines.”

In fact, science is overwhelmingly complex, and the European Union has been one of the biggest supporters of the exchange for EVs, even if some of the other environmental behaviors have been badly backfired in the past.

We’ve already mentioned Germany’s air quality, but the best example must be Europe’s former diesel romance. In the early 1990s, the continent was operated under the assumption that diesel vehicles tended to be more economical than gasoline vehicles, which should be less environmentally friendly. The government has given priority to fuel accordingly, and diesel-powered passenger cars have become the norm. Twenty years later, Europe is still recovering from that sloppy mistake, but diesel technology has improved considerably thanks to the unlimited support it has received. If not enacted responsibly, electrification could lead to a similar future — as well as other miraculous solutions to our lasting hunger for synthetic fuels, hydrogen, or Earth’s resources. ..

We are relatively convinced that deploying alternative energy solutions will cost billions of dollars, and if Europe is serious about meeting these goals, it will cost billions more. It means that it will take. France’s major industrial lobby, La Plateforme Automobile (PFA), will need to spend an additional € 17.5 billion (US $ 20.8 billion) in the middle of the next decade to continue developing the infrastructure needed to drive the desired changes. I estimate that there is. Germany is probably considering three times that amount, and some analysts suggest that European lobbying indicators are too conservative. The European Commission is already operating under the assumption that building the necessary charging infrastructure will require more than $ 100 billion by 2040.

Electrification has also resulted in widespread unemployment, with PFA suggesting that France will remove 100,000 automotive jobs (more than half of the industry’s current strength) by 2035. Germany’s fairly large car workforce will probably lose several times that amount.

Although the industry has habitually expressed a strong commitment to electrification of press materials, Lobbying groups tend to oppose governments that ban the sale of vehicles of all kinds.. Most people tell the EU that the mixed approach is best, with automakers continuing to pursue all technologies until the market determines a clear winner. This was true even after the Commission published its latest proposal, reminding us that it does not always indicate that what is being said is being done. That doesn’t necessarily mean that the mixed approach is wrong. But it feels and sounds better than spending extra time figuring out what really works best, such as consumer needs, financial reporting, or what’s happening to us. It reminds us that it is often easier to do with a solution. atmosphere.

Again, if there is overwhelming evidence that manufacturers and government officials are simply making arbitrary environmental or technical promises, the authors assume that these are serious conversations. Are stupid It will eventually be forgotten and reintroduced five years later as if it were a whole new concept..

[Image: JL IMAGES/Shutterstock]

Europe proposes to ban internal combustion engine vehicles by 2035

Source link Europe proposes to ban internal combustion engine vehicles by 2035

Back to top button