FAA cracks down on unruly airline passengers prior to taking office

The Federal Aviation Administration has cracked down on what is called an “obstructive increase” in threatening or violent behavior by airline passengers and has introduced a zero-tolerance policy for disruptive behavior until March. The move addresses last week’s attack on the Capitol and the long-standing problem of passengers refusing to wear masks.

Under a new order signed by Chief Steve Dixon on Wednesday, the FAA will take legal action against passengers who assault, intimidate, intimidate or interfere with airline crew members. This could include fines of up to $ 35,000 and referrals for criminal charges. Authorities previously had the authority to fine and refer people for prosecution, but tended to warn them before they got there. This will stop issuing warnings as a first step.

“Flight is the safest means of transportation and I have signed this order to maintain it,” Dixon said in a statement.

Some lawmakers are calling on the Trump administration to move further. New York Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer, who will soon become the Senate’s majority leader, named the people who attacked the Capitol on the federal “ban list” on Tuesday, a tool used by the federal government to maintain. He said it should be added. Terrorism is suspected from the airspace of the United States.

The FAA’s policy shift occurs after airlines, flight attendant unions, and passengers report devastating and threatening actions from supporters of President Trump on flights to and from Washington and at airports. Reports of such actions began on a flight to Washington in the days leading up to the attack on the Houses of Parliament on January 6, and have continued since then.

Saranelson, head of the Flight Attendants Association, which represents approximately 50,000 flight attendants on several airlines, including United Airlines, said: “We commend FAA administrator Dixon for his clear support for our safety and security.” This serves as a deterrent to unruly passengers who violated aviation safety rules. Let’s do it. “

On Thursday, Black American Airlines flight attendants were exposed to “racial adjectives” on the Washington hotel shuttle, according to a union representing airline flight attendants. On Friday, Alaska Airlines banned 14 passengers from future flights, describing their actions on a flight from Washington to Seattle as “noisy, controversial” and harassing. Several other airlines have recently reported that they will keep passengers out of future flights. In a widely shared episode, Trump supporters also stopped when two Republican senators, Mitt Romney of Utah and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, traveled back and forth between Washington.

American Airlines said Wednesday that it is taking steps to ensure the safety of its crew and customers ahead of next week’s presidential inauguration. This includes suspending alcohol on flights to and from Washington from Saturday to Thursday, moving crew from a hotel in downtown Washington to a hotel near the airport, providing private transportation between the hotel and the airport, and airport staff. Includes increased staff. In a travel advisory, Delta said it would discourage customers from traveling to Washington for their inauguration and would temporarily ban all checked baggage firearms on flights to the area.

In recent months, U.S. airlines have banned flights for hundreds of people because they refused to wear masks, and some airlines have added unruly Trump supporters to a group of banned customers. did. The airline passenger ban is independent of the federal no-fly zone list.

The main body for deciding who is added to the list is the Terrorist Screening Center, which is part of the FBI. The FAA has no authority over the list, but states that the FAA and airlines are working closely with local and federal law enforcement agencies on security. threat.

The list is a subset of the larger terrorist database and can also prevent people from getting a visa to the United States or undergoing additional screening. Its purpose and procedure is not an obvious fit for dealing with riots. Americans suspected of being involved in foreign terrorist organizations are sometimes put on the no-fly list, but it was built with the idea of ​​reducing the risk of very different threats: the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Repeatedly, al-Qaeda hijackers hijacked planes, turned them into missiles, and committed suicide in the process.

Civil libertarians have long challenged watchlists because the criteria for adding them to the watchlist are ambiguous and generally they are not informed that they are included or why. Foreigners abroad are almost unreliable, but in 2019, a federal judge in Oregon had insufficient steps to consider whether it was appropriate to put someone’s name on the no-fly list, and it was a due process. We have determined that it violates the Americans’ right to the Fifth Amendment.

FAA cracks down on unruly airline passengers prior to taking office

Source link FAA cracks down on unruly airline passengers prior to taking office

Back to top button