Kansas City, Missouri 2021-05-05 15:35:32 –
Former President Donald Trump will never return to Facebook — at least not yet.
4 months from Facebook Suspended Trump accountThe company’s quasi-independent supervisory board upheld the ban, concluding that he instigated violence leading to the deadly parliamentary riots on January 6. However, he told Facebook that the “indefinite” ban on the former president was unreasonable and told him to specify how long they would last. The ruling, which gives Facebook six months of compliance, effectively postpones the possibility of Trump’s return and makes the decision responsible. I will honestly return to the company.
That could put Facebook in the worst of all possible worlds-Trump supporters continue to rage at the ban, his critics push for broader social media regulation, and the company oversees He stuck to a serious problem that the Commission clearly wanted to resolve.
Jonathan Greenblatt, head of the Defamation League, said the decision was only to “kick the can” and emphasized the need for increased government oversight of social platforms.
The board decided that it was correct for Facebook to suspend Trump’s account four months ago. However, the company said it made a mistake by applying a vague penalty and passing a question to the board about whether to ban Trump permanently.
“This kind of indefinite penalty does not pass the international odor test,” said Michael McConnell, co-chair of the Supervisory Board, in a conference call with reporters. “We are not police officers, we dominate the realm of social media.”
In a statement, Trump did not directly mention the decision, but stated that the actions taken by Facebook, Twitter and Google were “total shame and embarrassment for our country.” “These corrupt social media companies have to pay a political price,” he added.
The board agreed with Facebook that two of Trump’s January 6 posts “gravely violated” both Facebook and Instagram content standards.
“We love you. You are very special,” Trump told the mob in his first post. Second, he called them “great patriots” and told them, “I remember this day forever.”
The board justified the suspension, saying it violated Facebook’s rules for praising and supporting those involved in violence. Specifically, the board quoted Facebook’s rules for “dangerous individuals and organizations.” It bans anyone who declares a violent mission and bans postings that express their support or admiration for these people or groups.
However, the company argued that it needed to be responsible for that decision.
“Facebook will have to permanently invalidate Trump’s account or impose a suspension for a certain period of time,” said former Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning Schmidt, Co-Chair.
The board said that if Facebook decides to restore Trump’s account, it must be able to respond quickly to further breaches. Among other recommendations, we advised not to make a clear distinction between political leaders and other influential users, as anyone with a large audience can pose a risk of serious harm. ..
According to the report on the decision, there were some dissenting opinions within the board of directors. A few board members have blamed Trump’s statement that the election was stolen, coupled with praise for the mob, to incite violence by calling for action and spreading false information and unverifiable rumors. I tried to characterize it as violating the rules of. However, the board said adding it as a breach would not affect the final decision.
Facebook has long straddled the problem, giving politicians more room than regular users. Because he argued that it was important for the public to hear even their rule-violating statements.
Dex Hunter Tricke, a board spokesman and former speech writer for Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, said:
If anything, Facebook should look more closely at the context of the post, he said.
“World leaders or very influential public figures have a very loud voice and reach. They are very influential, which makes their speech create all sorts of additional risks to people. It means having power, “said Hunter Tricke. “And Facebook needs to take that into account when dealing with potentially harmful things.”
Facebook has created a watch panel to arbitrate nasty content issues following widespread criticism of issues that respond quickly and effectively to false information, malicious language, and malicious impact campaigns. ..Of the board Previous decision Prior to Wednesday, the nine tended to prefer freedom of expression to content restrictions.
The board, which has 20 members and will eventually grow to 40, did not reveal how it voted for Trump’s suspension. A few members emphasized that Facebook should require users seeking a return after the outage to “recognize their misconduct and promise to comply with the rules in the future.”
This decision affects not only Trump, but also tech companies, world leaders, and people across the political spectrum. Many have fiercely conflicting views on the proper role of tech companies when it comes to regulating online speech and protecting people from abuse and misinformation. ..
Some have renewed the argument that the watch panel is just a distraction, even though the board has blamed Facebook.
“Let’s be clear. Years ago, it was a month-long bureaucratic process that should have taken swift and decisive action from Facebook to remove Trump from the platform. Facebook’s longtime critic, President Rasha Robinson, said the board was “a ploy to stop regulatory action.” Facebook can’t trust to regulate itself, and Congress and the White House need to intervene.
The day before the decision, Trump published a new blog on his personal website, “From Donald J. Trump’s Desk.” This page contains a dramatic video that claims “the light of freedom rises” and praises “a place to speak freely and safely”, but this page is elsewhere on the website. It is just a display of Trump’s recent statement available. It was easy to share on Facebook and Twitter, the platforms that banished him after the riots.
Locked out of social media, Trump has embraced other platforms to send his message on his own terms. He frequently interviewed friendly media outlets and emailed a series of statements to reporters through his official office and political parties.
This story has been amended to note that the board does not endorse Trump’s permanent ban.
Associated Press writer Jill Corbin of Washington, Taliabel of New York, and David Kleper of Providence, Rhode Island contributed to the story.
Facebook board upholds Trump ban, just not indefinitely | Politics Source link Facebook board upholds Trump ban, just not indefinitely | Politics