Tech

Facebook Challenges Superspreading-New York Times

This article is part of In the technical newsletter. You can do it Sign up here I will receive it on weekdays.

The big internet companies are finally taking the false alarm “Superspreader” seriously. (Only the big lies of the global health crisis and fraudulent elections were needed.)

I have written about influential people, including former President Donald J. Trump. A means of disseminating false information Online on important topics such as election integrity and vaccine safety. Some of those people have repeatedly twisted our beliefs, and Internet companies most often give them a pass.

Let’s delve into why habitual misinformation sellers are important and why Internet companies are starting to focus on them. This includes new rules introduced by Facebook this week.

Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube are credited with starting to target criminals with repeated false alarms. But I also want people to recognize the limits of corporate behavior and understand the difficulty of applying these policies fairly and transparently.

How big a problem is a person who repeatedly posts something that isn’t true?

Much of what people say online is not always true. I want some space in the middle of the mess. The concern is when the information is completely wrong and we know that some of the same people are responsible for amplifying the wrong information over and over again.

last fall, Coalition of false alarm researchers About half of all retweets associated with multiple widely spread false allegations of election interference Dating back to just 35 Twitter accounts, Also included are Mr. Trump and conservative activist Charlie Kirk.Recent research group Identified about 12 accountsIncluding Robert F. Kennedy Jr., he repeated unreliable information about the vaccine, sometimes over the years, spreading a fake “cure” for Covid-19.

Until recently, whether someone posted junk health information or false election conspiracy theories once or 100 times, or whether he was Justin Bieber or his Facebook followers were five cousins. It was hardly a problem.Internet companies that are usually evaluated The content of each message is onlyIt didn’t make sense.

How policy is beginning to focus on these addicts

The January 6 riots at the US Capitol showed the danger of repeated falsehoods to the masses trying to believe in falsehoods. Internet companies have begun to deal with the enormous influence of people with large numbers of followers who habitually disseminate false information.

Wednesday facebook Said We will apply stricter penalties to personal accounts that repeatedly post what the company’s fact checkers deem misleading or untrue. Posts from addicts don’t spread much in Facebook’s news feed, so It is less likely to be seen by others. Enacted in March Similar policy for Facebook groups..

Twitter created a “five strikes” system a few months ago. Escalate punishment For those who tweet false alarms about the coronavirus vaccine.Internet companies are down account Of some repeat offenders Including Kennedy..

It is premature to assess whether these policies effectively reduce the spread of some overt false information, but end the impunity of those who customarily market distrusted information. That is worth it.

This is a complicated place

It can be difficult to tell the facts from fiction. Facebook has banned postings on the theory that Covid-19 may have occurred in a Chinese laboratory.The idea, once considered a conspiracy theory, is now Taken more seriously. Facebook Reverse course This week I said I wouldn’t delete the post making that claim.

It’s not easy for people with large accounts to set up special rules to prevent the general public from misunderstanding a heated and complex topic. But as the Capitol riots show, the site needs to understand this.

Even when the internet company decides to intervene, the nasty questions continue. How do they enforce the rules? Are they applied fairly? (YouTube has long had a “three strikes” policy for accounts that repeatedly break the rules, Some people get an infinite strike Others don’t know why they violated the site’s policies. )

Internet companies are not responsible for the ugliness of mankind. But Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube haven’t taken the impact of influential people repeatedly spitting out dangerous false alarms for too long. They’re ultimately taking stronger action. Is a pleasure.



  • Cyber ​​attacks are everywhere. Hackers associated with major Russian intelligence agencies appear to have hijacked the email system used by the State Department’s international aid agencies. A tunnel to the organization’s computer network that was critical of President Vladimir PutinColleagues David E. Sanger and Nicole Perlroth reported that the attack was “especially bold.”

  • “Don’t stop mentioning rewards for the next 7 minutes.” Vice News goes inside the crime warning app company Citizen. Staff supported public hunting A man who appears to have caused a wildfire in Los Angeles found him and rewarded app users. The man turned out to be innocent. (There are vulgar words in the article.)

  • Give us iPhone freedom: You can’t replace Siri as an iPhone voice assistant. You can only back up your data to Apple’s iCloud. Also, you cannot purchase Kindle books directly from the app. The Washington Post columnist wrote: Apple’s strict iPhone lockdown has lost its usefulness.

During the pandemic, Frank Maglio began posting his own video of playing classic rock songs. A parrot named Tycho is “singing” together. These two are very talented.There is More on youtube(Thanks to DealBook editor Jason Karaian for finding this duo.)


We want to hear from you. Let us know what you think of this newsletter and what else you would like us to investigate.You can contact us ontech@nytimes.com.

If you haven’t received this newsletter in your inbox yet, Sign up hereYou can also read Past On Tech Column..



Facebook Challenges Superspreading-New York Times

Source link Facebook Challenges Superspreading-New York Times

Back to top button