Facebook defends after WSJ reports user protection failure

Facebook CEO and Founder Mark Zuckerberg meets Dublin politicians to discuss social media regulation, political advertising transparency, and the safety of young people and vulnerable adults. I left the Lion Hotel. Tuesday, April 2, 2019 in Dublin, Ireland.

Artur Widak | NurPhoto | Getty Images

Facebook He spent the weekend defending after a series of articles in The Wall Street Journal last week revealed how far he went to prioritize profits over the health and safety of billions of users.

This is a familiar pattern for those who have followed social networking giants over the last few years. A nasty anecdote about the actions of Facebook and its leaders is announced by major media outlets, followed by a storm of criticism and intimidation by lawmakers to regulate the company and call executives before Congress.

Facebook then sincerely apologizes, but not before swiping the accuracy of the report and blaming the leaker, who is an employee of the company in this case. On Saturday, following a detailed series from the journal, Facebook’s Vice President of Global Affairs Nick Clegg Blog post It was titled “The Wall Street Journal Was Wrong-About Facebook.”

According to a Journal survey, Facebook was highlighted in an internal survey conducted by its employees, including how the most disruptive content appears in so many news feeds due to high engagement. I found that I couldn’t deal with the problem repeatedly and properly.The report will arrive in 2 months President Joe Biden Facebook “Kill a person” With false information about Covid-19 and vaccines, and after the company struggled to find a consistent message to deal with false information about the 2020 elections.

The issues highlighted by the journal were in line with what Facebook critics have long said: executives are obsessed with revenue growth and involvement.

one of The story said CEO Mark Zuckerberg Employees have recommended changes that the company can make to reduce the algorithmic boost given to the highlights and the harmful content that has received a lot of attention. According to the report, Zuckerberg responded by telling employees that the proposal would be rejected if it had a significant impact on user interaction.

so Another pieceThe journal outlined how Facebook ignored or brushed on Instagram-induced mental health problems, especially for teenage girls. Facebook knew about the problem because it drew conclusions from its own research. Not only did the company fail to improve, but it is currently planning an Instagram version for children under the age of 13.

One of the things Facebook tested as a potential fix for Instagram was to hide likes. After trying the idea, Facebook found that it didn’t improve anything. Still, the company decided to roll out hidden likes as a user option because it would be accepted by the media and parents as a strong positive indication that Instagram cares about users. bottom. According to the report..

Another journal report Facebook has found that it rarely addresses the issue in markets other than the United States, as there are not enough people in the local language and dialect needed to identify the issue. Thus, there are places where sites run wild due to false information against vaccines and other lies and conspiracy theories.

For a company worth $ 1 trillion, last year’s revenue of $ 86 billion, and profit of about $ 30 billion, it’s no excuse not to hire the right professionals.

Facebook protected itself As is often the case. The company accused the journal of misunderstanding its behavior and implying terribly false motivations from leaders and employees.

“Facebook understands the significant responsibilities associated with operating a global platform,” Clegg wrote in a reply to the series. “We take it seriously and do not hesitate to scrutinize or criticize it, but we fundamentally reject the false characteristics of this work and the criticism of the company’s motives.”

However, as a reporter for the treatise itself, Craig did not challenge certain facts reported by the journal. Point out.. And if the past is any sign, investors continue to buy stock, Regulatory authority Fail to act.

A Facebook representative said, “I’m working with a WSJ reporter to get the answers included in the series,” with no comments other than the blog post.

look: Facebook facing a parliamentary investigation into its impact on teens and children

Facebook defends after WSJ reports user protection failure

Source link Facebook defends after WSJ reports user protection failure

Back to top button