Facebook Co., Ltd.
Covid-19 has removed the ban on postings claiming to be artificial or manufactured. This is a policy shift that reflects the deepening debate about the origin of the pandemic that was first identified in Wuhan, China almost 18 months ago.
The Wall Street Journal reported on Sunday that three researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Veterans Affairs in China became fully ill in November 2019. They sought hospital careAccording to a previously undisclosed US intelligence report.
“In the light of ongoing research into the origin of COVID-19, we will no longer remove the claim that COVID-19 was manufactured artificially or from apps in consultation with public health experts,” Facebook said in a statement. It is stated in. Wednesday website.
Wednesday President Biden Ordered an investigation by a U.S. intelligence agency To the origin of the virus. The White House pressures China to carry out its own investigation after seeing the World Health Organization as part of Beijing’s investigation completed and calling on efforts to track the origin of the virus and move it to another country. It was called.
Earlier this month, a group of 18 prominent scientists Asked for a deeper investigation In the situation where the virus appeared, including the possibility that the accident in the laboratory released the virus.
China has repeatedly denied that the virus has escaped from one of the labs and has accused the United States of hype about Labreak theory. On Sunday, China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs quoted the conclusions of the WHO-led team after visiting the Wuhan Institute of Virginology in February.
In February, Facebook began banning allegations that the virus was artificially or manufactured as part of a list of unauthorized and misleading health claims.
“We continue to work with health professionals to respond to the evolving nature of the pandemic and regularly update our policies as new facts and trends emerge,” Facebook said in a statement Wednesday. I will.
Facebook is struggling to regulate user content, and as a result, lawmakers, advocates, and users have complained that their decisions are opaque, inconsistent, and unfair. The website has community standards, but no other internal guidelines have been published. The logic behind some other enforcement efforts is unclear, That system for arbitrating content As a result, many users face punishment for incomprehensible violations.
Facebook’s independent supervisory board was critical of the company’s executive efforts.With a decision earlier this month Supports the ban on former President Donald TrumpThe board said that if the company decides to keep him out forever, the company must better explain why. The board urged the company to clarify the rules for prominent individuals, formulate penalties for offenders, did not state clear rules, and did not explain how to enforce them. I added criticism to it.
On the board Overturned some moderation decisions, Including a ruling that it was too strict Remove user posts praising the use of hydroxychloroquineThe once widely debated treatment for Covid-19 has been found by medical authorities to be generally ineffective.
— Sarah Needleman contributed to this article.
Write to Newley Purnell at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2020 DowJones & Company, Inc. all rights reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
Facebook ends banning posts claiming Covid-19 is man-made
Source link Facebook ends banning posts claiming Covid-19 is man-made