New Orleans

Federal judge orders Justice Dept. to release obstruction memo on former President Trump – New Orleans, Louisiana

New Orleans, Louisiana 2021-05-05 00:21:00 –

A federal judge wrote a legal memorandum prepared by the Trump-era Justice Department for then-William Barr lawyer before announcing the conclusion that President Donald Trump did not interfere with the judiciary during the Russian investigation. I ordered a release. The Department of Justice refused to give a memorandum of understanding to the Government Transparency Group on March 24, 2019, which demanded it under the Freedom of Information Act. He said the document represented the lawyer’s private advice and was exempt from disclosure under public records because it was prepared before a formal decision was made. However, Judge Amy Berman Jackson of the US Department of Justice said that when the Department of Justice withdrew the document, it obscured “the true purpose of the memorandum.” She has a memo from the Office of Legal Counsel of the Department of Justice that includes “strategic rather than legal advice,” and both authors and recipients already have a common understanding of what the prosecution’s decision will be. Said that. She said this meant it wasn’t “decisive,” as the Justice Department maintained. In other words, a review of the document revealed that the Attorney General was not engaged in the decision on whether the president should be prosecuted for obstruction, Jackson said in a Monday order. Despite being pointed out by special counsel Robert Swan Mueller and his team, Barr and senior Judiciary leaders have decided to remove Trump’s obstruction. Not reaching that conclusion was an important moment for the president. The four-page summary of the presentation and Mueller’s report preceded the publication of the 448-page document and helped shape public awareness of the conclusions of the study. Mueller then complained to Barr that his summary did not fully capture the findings and caused “national turmoil.” Citizens for Washington’s Responsibility and Ethics have filed a public record request for Barr to contact him about the decision to interfere after he and other senior officials said. The conclusion was reached in consultation with the Office of Legal Counsel. The group has filed a proceeding seeking access to two specific documents. Jackson has determined that one of the documents described by Judiciary officials as “an untitled, dateless statutory analysis” has been properly withdrawn from the group. But she ordered the release of another memo. It concludes that the evidence gathered by Mueller’s team, created for Bar by then-Director of Legal Advisors and another senior Justice Department, does not support Trump’s sabotage charges. At her order, Jackson said a letter to Congress explaining the notes prepared for the bar and the report of the special adviser was “written at the same time by the exact same people.” The email is that the author and the recipient of the memorandum are working together to develop the advice that the OLC will provide, but the letter to Congress is a priority and is completed first. ” It was.

A federal judge wrote a Trump-era Justice Department legal memorandum prepared for then-Attorney General William Barr before announcing the conclusion that President Donald Trump did not interfere with the judiciary during the Russian investigation. I ordered an announcement.

The Justice Department has refused to submit a March 24, 2019 memorandum of understanding to the government’s Transparency Group, which requested it under the Information Disclosure Act. This document represents the attorney’s personal advice and was prepared before a formal decision was made and is therefore exempt from disclosure under the Public Records Act.

However, Judge Amy Berman Jackson of the US District Court said that when the Justice Department withdrew the document, it obscured “the true purpose of the memorandum.” She has a memo from the Office of Legal Counsel of the Department of Justice that includes “strategic rather than legal advice,” and both authors and recipients already have a common understanding of what the prosecution’s decision will be. Said that. She said this meant it wasn’t “decisive,” as the department maintained.

“In other words, a review of the document reveals that the Attorney General was not subsequently involved in the decision on whether the president should be prosecuted for obstruction of justice. The fact that he is not prosecuted It was natural, “Jackson said. By order on Monday.

Even if Special Advisor Robert Swan Mueller and his team did not reach that conclusion, the decision by Bar and senior Judiciary leaders to remove Trump’s obstruction was an important moment for the president. The four-page summary of the presentation and Mueller’s report preceded the publication of the 448-page document and helped shape public awareness of the conclusions of the study. Mueller then complained to Barr that his summary did not fully capture the findings and caused “national turmoil.”

Citizens for Washington’s Responsibility and Ethics file a public record request for contact on the decision to interfere after Barr says he and other senior officials have reached that conclusion in consultation with the Office of Legal Counsel. did. The group has filed a proceeding seeking access to two specific documents.

Jackson determined that one of the documents described by Judiciary ministry officials as “an untitled, dateless statutory analysis” was properly withdrawn from the group.

But she ordered the release of another memo. It concludes that the evidence gathered by Mueller’s team, created for Bar by then-Director of Legal Advisors and another senior Justice Department, does not support Trump’s sabotage charges. ..

At her order, Jackson said a letter to Congress explaining the notes prepared for the bar and the special counsel’s report was “written at the same time by the exact same people.”

“E-mail is not only working with the creator and recipient of the memorandum to produce the advice that the OLC is likely to provide, but the letter to Congress is a priority and is completed first. It shows that there is, “the judge wrote.

Federal judge orders Justice Dept. to release obstruction memo on former President Trump Source link Federal judge orders Justice Dept. to release obstruction memo on former President Trump

Back to top button