The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Wednesday in the most important proceedings in the Supreme Court since the groundbreaking Supreme Court ruling in 1973. Roe v. Wade This effectively legalized abortion in the United States.
NS case, Dobbs vs. Jackson Women’s Health Organization defeats Mississippi’s leadership against the state’s last abortion clinic. The state seeks to ban abortion 15 weeks after pregnancy and urges the Supreme Court to overthrow Law.
Here are five important points from an important court session.
Conservative judges signal support for Mississippi abortion restrictions
Some conservative judges signal Ready to help Mississippi and threaten Rho. Judge Brett Kavanaugh appears to disagree with the principles of precedent, citing many groundbreaking cases in which the court overturned previous decisions, such as the Brown v. Board of Education’s school separation.
Justice Amy Coney BarrettAdoption services, nominated by Donald Trump like Kavanaugh, have suggested that the need for abortion can be nullified by removing the burden of “forced parenting.”
Veteran justice, Clarence Thomas, disputed the idea that there is a constitutional right to abortion, saying that the method of “armed rights” in the Second Amendment to the Constitution is not clearly defined.
Conservatives question the fetal viability line and are uncertain about overthrowing Rho
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Roberts, asked what the effect of moving the limits of the egg was. [allowing termination until a fetus is viable outside the womb, around 24 weeks] I returned to early pregnancy.
“If you think the problem is one of the choices, feasibility has nothing to do with the choices. If it really is a matter of choice, why 15 weeks? [Mississippi’s limit] Not enough time? ” He said.
Judge Samuel Alito questioned whether the fetal viability was even the right line for the court to draw.
“If a woman wants to be free from the burden of pregnancy, that interest will not disappear the moment she crosses the boundaries of feasibility,” he said.
Liberals defend precedent and test religious motivation
Judge Elena Kagan said the main goal of the case is “to prevent people from thinking that this court is a political institution that goes back and forth depending on which part of the population screams loudest. Usually you need something powerful. Beyond the fact that you think the case is wrong, justification for such a case. “
Judge Sonia Sotomayor, nominated by Barack Obama like Cagan, has shown that Mississippi believes in motivations to limit abortion. Religious.. She was afraid of further threats to precedents protecting access to contraception and the right to same-sex marriage.
And Judge Stephen Breyer quoted from the 1992 planned parent-child relationship v Casey decision.
“Rejecting a fire without the most compelling reason to reconsider the basin decision would go beyond serious problems and upset the court’s legitimacy,” he said.
“What’s new here?”
Liberal judges asked what was novel about the Mississippi River case, while many others have not changed the precedent.
“It hasn’t changed much from Roe and Casey,” Kagan said. “The reason people agree is the same reason they always had … except that there was a 50-year-old woman we depended on this right for us in exactly the same place. Are you there? “
Sotomayor chimed, “For more than 30 years, 15 judges have reaffirmed the basic feasibility line … 15 with different political backgrounds.”
The Liberal Party warns that public confidence in institutions has been shaken
Sotomayor is a nonpartisan organization in court by reversing the Roe v. Wade case after Trump’s three traditionalist candidates (Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Connie Barrett) have tilted their majority significantly to the right. It was suggested that the trust of could be gained.
She told Mississippi Solicitor Scott Stewart: Can this institution survive the stench it creates in the general perception that the Constitution and its reading are merely political acts? “
She continued: “If people believe it’s all political … how will the court survive?”
Mr. Breyer added that the risk of such a “super case” is that Americans consider judges to be “just politicians.”
“That’s what kills us,” he said.
Five Points from the Mississippi Abortion Proceedings Hearing of the US Supreme Court | Roe v. Wade Case
Source link Five Points from the Mississippi Abortion Proceedings Hearing of the US Supreme Court | Roe v. Wade Case