Riverside

GOP has blocked For The People Act. What happens now? – Riverside, California

Riverside, California 2021-06-23 05:15:15 –

The bill was pushed by Congressional Democrats who argued that it needed to counter some new Republican legislation that tightened state voting rules.

Washington — Senate Republicans have blocked discussions on a drastic review of how elections are held in the United States. The bill was pushed by Congressional Democrats who argued that it needed to counter this year’s new GOP law, which tightens state voting rules.

Relation: Republican Filibuster Block People’s Law Voting Bill

Let’s see what has happened so far, what is in the bill, and what will happen next.

Why did the Senate Republicans block the bill?

Republicans have long opposed democratic efforts to review U.S. elections, saying the proposed reforms are more about ensuring democratic victories than voting fairness. I will. They pointed out that the Democratic Party introduced an overhaul two years ago, before the 2020 elections, and said the large bill was equivalent to taking over federal elections run by state and local election offices. I will. Republicans argue that the rise in turnout in the 2020 elections is evidence that reform is not needed. But at the same time, state legislature counterparts have pointed out unfounded claims of fraudulent voting as justification for stricter rules and stronger election monitoring at the state and local levels.

What does the bill do?

Known as the For The People Act, the bill sets the minimum criteria for voting in the United States and sets election dates as federal holidays. All states must provide automatic voter registration and at least 15 days of early voting. Some states have already done this, others have not. And Democrats argue that federal standards will reduce confusion among the people. They also say that standards will blunt the impact of new state law that creates barriers for voters.

But the bill doesn’t just deal with election issues. There are many other provisions packed into the 888-page bill, including widespread expansion of public funding for campaigns, constituency changes and ethical reforms. Written when the Democratic Party lost power, it was a statement of priority over the final legislation. It has been improved several times and more changes are expected.

Is this the end of the road?

Democratic leaders are hoping for a vote on Tuesday, and their efforts to pass the bill will continue. “In the voting rights dispute, the vote was a starter pistol, not a finish line,” Senate leader Chuck Schumer said in a post-vote statement. However, due to the 50-50 split in the Senate, there are few options due to the filibuster rule, which requires 60 votes to proceed with most bills. Now the battle is on whether the Democrats can agree that voting laws that are worth changing or aside filibuster are very important.

They will also continue to attempt to build public support for their efforts. Senator Amy Klobuchar (Democratic Party), who chairs a powerful rules committee, said Tuesday that voters and local elections could interfere with the party.

Is the Democratic Party united?

At least two Democratic senators, Kyrsten Cinema in Arizona and Joe Manchin in West Virginia, said they were opposed to abolishing the filibuster rules. Cinema supports the electoral reform bill, but a recent opinion piece argued that the rule “helps to force moderation and protect the country from cataclysms.”

Manchin, who initially opposed the bill, created a new version that removes some of the more controversial provisions, such as same-day voter registration and public funding options. His proposal also requires a national ID requirement. This is something Democrats have never done before, but it seems to be worth considering. This requirement is less stringent than the Republican-promoted requirement of a particular state and allows voters to provide non-photo IDs such as utility bills.

What changes is the Democratic Party considering?

Discussions are underway among Democrats in parliament on how to proceed, although leaders personally point out that both Cinema and Manchin are opposed to the abolition of the rule. , That doesn’t mean they oppose the change in rules. And President Joe Biden showed his willingness to consider change. Democratic leaders argue that there are opportunities to improve the process and weigh three potential changes.

  • If you want to block voting on the bill, we require 41 senators from minority parties to attend.
  • Create a narrow exemption from the rules suspended for voting and election legislation. There is precedent for this. The Democratic Party has previously relaxed the rules so that most government candidates can be identified by a simple majority, and the Republicans have eliminated filibuster of Supreme Court candidates during the Trump administration.
  • Require opposition members to speak continuously to prevent legislation from proceeding-starting with version -60 of filibuster, including gradually reducing the number of senators who can prevent voting. A period of weeks that eventually reaches a simple majority.

What will the Biden administration do next?

Biden vowed to bet what the White House would call the “Presidential Battle” over securing access to American votes, but he was not yet at the center of the battle. Vice President Kamala Harris has spoken with lawmakers and advocates of various voting rights over the past few weeks to meet with Texas Democrats who oppose the GOP’s efforts to tighten voting rules and the administration’s efforts. Has led.

These meetings are expected to continue, according to White House officials who spoke on condition of anonymity, and Harris confirms support for voting rights and efforts to suspend restrictive voting bills in the state. Make an official statement. Biden also met with Manchin to discuss bills, including a voting reform bill.

GOP has blocked For The People Act. What happens now? Source link GOP has blocked For The People Act. What happens now?

Back to top button