Group living situations on November ballot – Denver, Colorado

Denver, Colorado 2021-10-20 20:37:37 –

Denver — Boulder and Denver voters will consider two contrasting ballot questions dealing with the living conditions of the group in November.

One aims to increase the number of unrelated people who are allowed to live in their homes. The other is to limit the living conditions of the group by overturning previous city council decisions.

Boulder Ballot Question 300

In Boulder, voters are asked if more people should be allowed to live in the same house to help with affordable issues.

Ballot Question 300 asks voters whether the city allows one and one person to occupy a residential unit per legal bedroom.

This means that in a three-bedroom house, four unrelated adults can live together. In a four-bedroom house, five unrelated adults can live together.

Currently, Boulder City Ordinance allows three to four unrelated adults to live in up to the same unit.

“A great many people in Boulder are currently living illegally technically because they have nothing to do with them, and they are not leased, they do not have the legal rights of the tenants, and It’s about helping them legalize their living conditions, “said bedroom volunteer Hannah George for the People Campaign.

George lives with the other seven and says she couldn’t afford to live in Boulder without her roommates, even with her work. The co-op had to pay $ 600 to exist after a long application process.

She believes that this ballot will help her adapt to different lifestyles and increase the flexibility of her lessees.

“It’s also to ensure that people don’t have to marry or live with our housemates to enjoy living together. I know someone who had to do that. “George said.

She points out that nuclear families are allowed to have higher occupancy, and she says the ballot question is a reasonable compromise. This group is supported by the Emergency Family Support Association.

more: Election 2021: Breakdown of three Colorado-wide voting issues

Others have stated that ballot questions are well-meaning, but can have unintended consequences and need to be considered more carefully.

“Unfortunately, this measure is not very well thought out and is really focused primarily on a single lessor, not on the family,” said Mayor Bolder Sam Weaver. Stated.

Ballot questions do not set affordable housing requirements or limit rental prices, so this ballot question allows real estate owners to charge per room and actually rent. I’m worried that the price may go up.

“They can charge the same amount for each bedroom, but they can accommodate more people. Therefore, it does not necessarily reduce the rent at all. It also increases the value of the land, so speculation. It makes it more attractive for homes to buy single-family homes and turn them into rents, “says Weaver.

He is also worried about the potential impact of this voting bill on schools. This is because increasing referendums may reduce enrollment from kindergarten to high school and force some students to close.

More than half of Boulder’s dwellings are already for rent, and Weaver believes that this measure only puts home ownership out of the reach of families.

“This could give students more access to rental properties at the expense of those who aren’t in the CU,” he said.

Weaver agrees that something needs to be done to deal with affordability in the living conditions of cities and groups, but he wants Boulder’s city council to work on this topic instead. ..

Denver Ballot Question 2F

Meanwhile, in Denver, voters will be asked in November whether to overturn the recent city council’s decision to expand the group’s living conditions.

The city council revised the ordinance in February to allow people to live legally and share costs with four other unrelated adults in the same home.

Robin Nichi, an entire Denver city council member, said the old ordinance was outdated and caused a lot of confusion regarding nursing homes and other group living conditions. Due to restrictions in the old town, the building may not be fully utilized.

By updating the rules, Kniech says it helped the city make it a little easier to find a home in Denver during an unprecedented pandemic.

“Some people live together to share costs, others live together to share care,” she said.

However, supporters of Ballot Question 2F believe that the city council made the wrong decision and passed the new ordinance, which was against the wishes of many members.

The group behind the ballot questions, Safe and Sound Denver, states that the new ordinance is dishonest, can increase density and jeopardize the safety of the neighborhood.

Denver7 asked the organizer of the campaign for an interview, but did not receive a response. However, on the group’s campaign website, Safe and Sound Denver organizers say they are ignoring the zoning code, fearing that the new ordinance will add half-baked homes in the neighborhood.

“Denbers want a safe and stable area. We want our children to be protected in a buffer zone between schools and half-baked homes, shelters and licensed camps. We want to reduce density, litter, congestion and parking issues. The mayor and city council didn’t listen; it’s our turn, “said Florence Sebern of Safe and Sound Denver. It is stated in.

Kniech disagrees with this and states that if the 2nd floor passes, people may be expelled from their homes for violating residence rules.

Prior to the new ordinance, Denver conducted an annual home occupancy survey of 60 to 100 and found that on average about half violated.

“If the 2nd floor passes, the investigation will start again tomorrow and people could be kicked out of the house, otherwise we’re still in this pandemic. That’s the real result,” says Kniech. I did. “This is the wrong time to eliminate housing options for our residents.”

Kniech also disagrees with Safe and Sound Denver’s claims about more half-baked homes, and the ordinance imposes strict rules on where they can be and bans them from the neighborhood of single-family homes. It states that it is.

She also funded non-profit Defend Colorado on the 2nd floor, 303 (to tighten city camp bans) and 304 (to reduce Denver sales tax from 4.81% to 4.5% and reduce city services somewhat). Because it provides, it casts doubt on the true meaning of the group. ..

The group poured over $ 540,000 in the November elections alone.

“I really want her to think about the big picture of this ballot,” Nichi said.

Both Denver and Boulder voters are asked to consider the situation of group living as part of a larger question about the affordability of state housing. Some cities want more access, while others want to limit these living conditions.

Voters in each city will finally decide in November whether group life can be considered as a solution to the housing crisis.

Group living situations on November ballot Source link Group living situations on November ballot

Back to top button