Boston, Massachusetts 2021-11-18 18:46:10 –
Please take a closer look This map..
This is what Massachusetts may have for the next 10 years.
After a vote of approval in the House and Senate on Wednesday afternoon, the Massachusetts State Assembly sent a new map of the state’s nine US Parliamentary districts to Governor Charlie Baker’s desk for final approval.
However, Partisan subdivision battles taking place in most of the country, Maps have certainly been debated among the blue Massachusetts Democrats.
The proposal does not dramatically change the general outline of the house district owned by the state’s nine Democrats (here for comparison). Current map), Some of the tweaks around the edges Pulled out vocals — surprisingly — protest..
The main issue was the unification of the Fall River in District 4, currently represented by Congressman Jake Ochincross.
Although the city’s placement within a single district, which is now divided into Districts 4 and 9, was generally praised, it was found in the building of District 9 members and former District 4 members. Some supporters and elected officials, including Joe Kennedy III, were separated from their South Coast companion, New Bedford. This remains in District 9. Dividing Fall River and New Bedford into two districts creates a “every ten-year opportunity” to create a two-city-backed district that can build political power for the inhabitants of the low-income South Coast community. I missed it. Proponents say they often feel ignored by Beacon Hill’s power centers.
“Congratulations on the fall river not being split, but very disappointed that the same is not true for the South Coast community to which it belongs,” said Dax Crocker, a member of the Alliance of Democrats in Drawing, in a statement Wednesday. rice field.
According to theory, having Fall River and New Bedford in the same district would give cities with a total population of over 195,000 the opportunity to elect one of their residents to Congress.
However, many community members and elected officials of Fall River have spoken in support of the unification of the city in District 4. And on his side, Fall River argued that it had more in common with traditional manufacturing cities like Taunton and Attleboro than the commercial fishing center of New Bedford.
After a five-hour hearing last week, cartographers released a slightly revised map — keeping Fall River and New Bedford in separate districts.
The map was overwhelmingly approved by the House of Representatives on Wednesday, with a 151-8 vote, followed by a more controversial passage of 26-13 in the Senate. It now goes to Baker’s desk, which has 10 days to sign or reject the bill. His office said Thursday that the governor was carefully considering the proposal.
Democratic Toneton Senator Marc Pacheco maps the change in South Coast district boundaries as a “domino effect” in efforts to strengthen the state’s only Boston-based District 7 minority representative. I objected to his explanation. Majority-Minority District.He and others pointed out Alternative map It integrated Fall River and New Bedford in District 9, while maintaining the majority-minority status in District 7.
“We will end up being used and we have to stop it,” said Pacheco, who voted against it. “And I don’t know when it will stop, but it has to end.”
Pacheco has suggested that maps may face legal issues. And while he suspected they would succeed, a longtime senator added that he “has never been disappointed” on the map.
Democratic Needam Senator Becca Rausch also had problems with “reductions” to five different districts of the Metrowest region and lack of “compactness” in maps.
“Marlboro and Hudson are in District 3, Milford is in District 4, Framingham is in District 5, and Norwood is in District 8.” She said. “Looking at the 8th Parliamentary District, it wraps around the 7th District like a V-neck T-shirt.”
Belmont Democrat and map co-author Will Brownsberger said Wednesday that he “deeply” regrets the fact that the proposed district did not have unanimous support.
“It’s always my goal to ensure that all Senators are happy with the outcome of the constituency change process,” Brownsberger said.
But he claimed they arrived at the end of the process. According to Rausch, Secretary of State Bill Galvin’s office “lacked enough skill” to prove the signature of Parliamentary nominations on time unless the map passed “now”. Was chased by.
“Sometimes we can leave things to July 31st and keep things moving sideways, perhaps to achieve some different results,” Brownsberger said. “But this is not the bill we have the opportunity to do.”
Keep all the latest news from Boston.com up to date
Here’s the new Massachusetts congressional map passed by lawmakers Source link Here’s the new Massachusetts congressional map passed by lawmakers