Atlanta

House progressives demand action after voting rights bill fails – Atlanta, Georgia

Atlanta, Georgia 2021-06-24 07:30:35 –

Congressman Mondea Jones, DN.Y. Talked to other Democrats at a press conference outside the Supreme Court and announced a bill to increase the number of seats for Supreme Court judges in Washington on Thursday, April 15, 2021. (Photo courtesy of Caroline Brehman / RollCall via CQ-Getty Images, Inc)

Now that Senate Republican Blocked the path forward With monumental ethical reforms and election bills, progressives are frustrated and openly Filibuster Even if the major moderates reveal They won’t change that..

“I think it’s a mistake not to try again. Personally, I think the days of filibuster are counted, even with the resistance of our own caucuses to end the filibuster. “New Mexico’s Democratic Senator Martin Heinrich told CNN. “Nothing makes the case better than the abuse of voting rights we see.”

In the Senate on Tuesday night, progressives called for direct involvement with President Joe Biden, hoping he would file a proceeding using Bully Pulpit.

Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat in Massachusetts, told CNN.

And the House of Representatives suggests that some progressives could block Biden’s signature bill if the problem isn’t resolved, and the Biden administration appears to have a path to bipartisan passage. Preparing to use one force that needs to hostage an important priority of: Negotiations Through a bipartisan infrastructure package..

New York Democrat Mondea Jones said:

Democrat Jamal Bowman, also in New York, at CNN, House Progressivists like him are ready to claim their power, especially if the Senate remains an obstacle to the Progressivist agenda. Said.

“Of course, 100%,” Bowman told CNN’s John King. “We’re ready to say it, we’re ready to do it. It’s enough that we’re having a conversation like this when we’re talking.”

In particular, Bowman said in his next vote on infrastructure packages: Therefore, if you shrink your infrastructure, we cannot guarantee that you will vote for the shrinking infrastructure package. “

Many progressive members have already raised issues regarding bipartisan infrastructure planning. They want a much larger bill that includes a much broader definition of policy. They extend themselves to vote for non-priority packages when major voting policy proposals go nowhere and the president himself isn’t doing enough to change legislation. I don’t feel forced to do that. In reality.

“I think it’s clear that (Biden) hasn’t done much. This is to bring together members of his own party, at least to make an exception to filibuster in order to save democracy. As the most powerful person in the world, he has all the resources he has available, “Jones said. “Instead, the work of the media and many senators has focused on bipartisan infrastructure packages.”

Democratic House Progressive Caucus Chairman Plumira Jayapal of the Washington Democratic Party has pushed back the idea that progressives will refrain from voting on infrastructure deals to advance voting legislation.

“In this business, as you know, it can be difficult to connect completely different issues to each other,” she told CNN. “These issues have different concerns, so we don’t connect the two, but they lack the patience of not only progressives, but people across the country who want to see movements and shelters. It’s clear that we are. We haven’t seen any movement. “

“He needs to speak out more”: Progressivists see Biden’s role

With the pressure of election promises and the not-so-distant midterm approaching, Democrats are taking clear next steps to keep the issue in the limelight. Moderate Democrats hope that external public pressure campaigns can make the changes they need, but many House progressives enact this law across the finish line. He feels he’s running out of time to do it and complains that Biden isn’t doing enough.

“Did the White House explain voting rights and saving our sick democracy as a top priority?” Jones asked. “I wasn’t aware of that. I think the action is more eloquent than words. I’ve seen tremendous debates about infrastructure and bipartisan infrastructure bills, but the president is a Tulsa. With the exception of the two minutes spent during the speech about the genocide, little was discussed about the fundamental importance of passing “for the people.” “

Jones is not the only critic of Biden’s limited public support for voting rights.

“He’s not absent, but he needs to be more vocal and more on the front line,” said Biden’s role in this process at CNN.

White House spokesman Jen Psaki challenged CNN’s Phil Mattingly on Tuesday to Bowman’s claim that the president wasn’t doing enough to put the voting law in the spotlight.

Saki further outlines that the president makes a private phone call, meets with key senators like Manchin, issues executive orders, and nominates candidates for the Justice Department to defend his right to vote. Defended Biden’s actions on the issue.

“I think it’s almost silent. It’s barely sitting on the back bench, and we’re — he’ll be standing with his supporters in this fight for a foreseeable future. “Pusaki said.

With Vice President Kamala Harris, who Biden tapped to lead the effort, the White House said it would continue to fight for legislation at the federal level, engaging with voting groups, lawmakers across the country who want to increase access to voting. It was.

“That’s why this fight isn’t over,” said Pusaki. “Regardless of today’s results, it will continue.”

The battle turns into filibuster

Frustration from progressives stems from a clear disagreement within the party on how to pass this signature bill and whether abolishing filibuster is the answer.

“I think the time to get rid of filibuster has come a long time ago,” Warren said.

“People didn’t give the Democrats the House, Senate, and White House to compromise with the rebels. We’ll eliminate filibuster and allow people to work,” said Ayanna Presley, Massachusetts. Tweet Tuesday prior to the Senate vote.

“I think other members of the House and Senate will be more and more dissatisfied with the White House (known) because it’s clear that personal conversations haven’t reached them,” Jones said. It was.

For Bowman, not providing voting rights can be part of the sacrifice of a majority of Democrats.

“Americans sent us here for delivery. If we offer, we will maintain power in 2022. If we don’t, we risk losing power if we show that we can’t. , Taking risks at this moment in American history and actually propelling the agenda of progressive democracy, “he said. On CNN.

But while progressives are angry, Democrats in Rank and File are not yet ready to take dramatic action. They believe in West Virginia Sen. Joe ManchinThe decision to vote to move the bill forward is a sign that there is still an opportunity to pass the bill solely with the support of democracy.

“In the next round, it’s very solid and productive among Democrats about what the outline of the final package can be delayed by Democrats and the process of getting it to the finish line. You can start a conversation, said Maryland Democrat John Sarbanes.

External pressure force

Even though it’s Manchin and Sen. Kyrsten Cinema in Arizona Continuing to oppose ending filibuster, and even with voting rights, Democrats like Surveys continue to expect that pressure will only force them to change their minds.

“Especially the external pressure hasn’t disappeared,” Sarbanes said. “They won’t let this go, they’ll keep going, because they understand that this is a historic moment.”

Holding Congressman Nikema Williams Civil Rights Legend John Lewis’s Home SeatEmphasized the role that external pressure can play in keeping the spotlight on voting rights.

“I don’t think voting will be off the radar during the summer,” Williams said in a CNN statement. “As people get vaccinated, the world opens up and gets involved on the ground, we meet more and more people. Advocacy groups stop by major states across the country to Washington, DC this summer. I’ve seen it come. Grassroots advocacy, voice leadership at the White House, and the work of my congressional colleagues to strengthen voting rights law enhances voting rights in our national conversation. Will continue. “

Williams, who was part of a group that met Harris in Atlanta last week to discuss voting rights, outlined how Georgia should serve as a reminder of how vulnerable but important voting rights are.

“At our home in Georgia, we fully understand our power,” Williams said. Two Senate outflow races It went to the Democratic Party in January and regained control of the US Senate. “Without the addition of two Georgian Senators in January, neither the chairman of the committee nor the leaders of the Senate would have been able to take their place. I continued to raise people’s voice and procedurally. Does not allow the rules to prevent free and fair access to our ballots. “

Our Revolutionary Secretary-General, Joseph Siebargese, said in a recent survey of members of the organization that voting rights were a top priority, calling on more than 7,000 people on Monday night, “This is our action. It is a call for ”, and promised to mobilize nationwide.

Accumulated anxiety among progressives will undoubtedly affect how Democrats plan their efforts to carry out the agenda they campaign for.

However, Surveyes argues that progressive anxiety is only part of the process, and believes the White House has just begun a voting dispute.

“The Democratic Party is great because there are so many different voices that focus on different issues on a particular day. Overall, I think we are determined to take a lot of good policies across the finish line. “He said.

“I would expect to see the temperature rise across the board from the White House, and in any conversation they might be doing behind the scenes,” he added. .. “This is a very all hands-on-deck moment for those who care about our democracy.”



House progressives demand action after voting rights bill fails Source link House progressives demand action after voting rights bill fails

Back to top button