As a resident source, I make it my job to complain about the hypocrisy of any industry that crosses my path, and the automotive sector keeps me busy and has little time left to deal with my own failures. not. I sometimes have to confess that I feel guilty about how often I have to be dissatisfied with electric cars. If you are willing to work with their charge limits and unimpressive ranges, EVs have a lot to offer even in their current state. But the way they have been sold is consistently dishonest, and I often end my days with the tip of an aneurysm caused by frustration.
But the wind seems to be changing.
After years of watching the industry hit the wall, the media seems ready to change its position.Acceleration of adoption of pure electric cars does not seem to be happening, too many EV startups are over It’s just an opportunity for investors to throw away their money.. Less and less people ask me about battery-powered cars in a way that suggests true enthusiasm. Excitement has given way to suspicion as more and more people are wondering if electricity is really everything.
The Wall Street Journal Released several articles on this issue this year, but the latest one was deleted last week. Rather than running in the story that electricity is an obvious choice for a cleaner environment, outlets began asking more difficult questions, and even spilling some bean tech companies to leave canned. Would like Among them was a question of how automakers could reduce EV prices to make them more competitive when the demand for materials to be put into EVs is very high. Moreover, if you know that the industry needs to be as cost-effective as possible, how likely is it that batteries will be produced in an environmentally friendly way?
We’ve been thinking the same for years — and it’s just for beginners. How does the country’s energy grid compete with EV-dominated landscapes? Can that energy be supplied in a more reliable and cleaner way than what we currently have? How can I get enough raw materials for battery production? Accumulating A whole new charging infrastructure for a more efficient planet Rather than keep what we have? What if consumers don’t like electric cars as much as internal combustion engines? What if EV doesn’t reach the same level as ICE as soon as we think about it? What about the ethical complications of mining in Third World countries??? What about the dangers of moving to a driving model that gives China (the world’s leading battery producer) a clear industrial advantage?
This is a corner where the industry and government have filled themselves with not truly critical thinking about the issue, but by permanently ignoring technology-related shortcomings and encouraging surface-level environmentalism. This is reminiscent of how the European Union treated air pollution. We assumed that prioritizing diesel-fueled vehicles would automatically win the day and reality would catch up decades later.
All electrical technologies popularized by Tesla include a type of environmental risk front-loading. EVs emit less carbon than traditional cars, even when charged with electricity made by burning coal, but they require more resources to make a powerful battery.
This inconvenient truth is one of the reasons why automakers are becoming more involved in the EV supply chain. Investings such as the new battery plant announced by General Motors this week are primarily aimed at better control over the supply, technology and costs of the most important EV components. However, the fourth factor that causes the priority list to rise rapidly is the control of the environmental footprint.
Purchasing battery cells made from renewable energy is one focus. Faced with very strong demand, European battery startup Northvolt, backed by Volkswagen and BMW, spent $ 2.75 billion last week to further expand its hydroelectric-rich low-carbon production facility in northern Sweden. I procured it.
Another notable topic is the mining of battery metals, especially lithium. The industry was more concerned about cobalt, which is mainly supplied by the Democratic Republic of the Congo on suspicion of child labor, but in recent years the role of metals in battery chemistry has diminished. Lithium cannot be easily minimized with lithium batteries. Stocks of US producers Albemarle and Livent are trading at near record highs.
Automakers using EVs as a tactic to better control their products are taking it even further Currently highlighted by a number of companies rethinking the concept of vehicle ownership As their lobbying group Go to the right -t0- repair movement (This believes that the company does not have the right to dictate what the customer can do with the product after purchase). But that’s probably another issue to dig into individually. Importantly, the automotive sector has abandoned established business practices and gained greater control over its products.
And if someone in the business can say it frankly, we can certainly have a frank and productive discussion on this issue. However, the EV problem is stalled with the idea that it will miraculously improve the environment, and unless you think too hard, thoughtful considerations won’t really get off the ground.
Again, this is not just a problem for tech companies. The oil industry has a lot of dislikes and a lot of stupid decisions. My current favorite is that it’s better to transport oil around the world using ultra-polluted tanker vessels or loading them into smoke-breathing trucks, rather than simply procuring (and refining) them. Travel through the pipeline, domestically as much as possible.The debate is by no means that Placing much of your energy infrastructure in one vulnerable space is too risky, Or having a complex political interest that can discourage home-style refineries.Catch-all excuses have just been given perhaps Bad for the environment Only the most thoughtful examples, including references to ruining protected land..
That is if we are lucky. But why did EV’s love diminish when it was possible to spit out the same story in 2021?
Well, we are starting to see some of their shortcomings. More importantly, so is the industry that promised a pandemic in a few years. This is in line with everyone who realizes that the global supply chain is not always what we can trust forever. A shortage of semiconductors that are completely destroying automakers. EVs may not really be sustainable from a business perspective — at least not yet.
“The data show that the battery cost curve is falling much slower than the hype. There are many bottlenecks and challenges that people are ignoring,” the research platform Smartkarma published. Analyst Mio Kato said. WSJ..
Most studies have shown that BEVs drive current vehicles until the wheels fall, buy the right ones, source as much energy as humans can from renewable energy sources, and for at least 10 years. It suggests good for the environment only when driving.On the other hand, EV companies seem to be profitable only with the support of many excited investors. Supported by government subsidies..
Now, critically, it seems to have lost its proposition. However, that does not suggest that appliances will not eventually surpass gasoline-powered vehicles after some further research and development. The real problem seems to be that in order for us to reach the finish line as soon as possible, everyone who defends the cause seems to understand that fact. But that’s just one opinion, and I’m always interested in consumer consensus.
How environmentally friendly do you think electric vehicles are today? And what do you anticipate until you reach the same economic level as an internal combustion engine? Are we moving in the right direction, or has the entire EV experiment failed altogether due to relevant marketing attempts and government influence?
How green is the EV?
Source link How green is the EV?