Over the past few months, federal law enforcement agencies have used a variety of surveillance techniques to track riots that participated in the January 6 attack on the US Capitol. This shows that surveillance is being strengthened nationwide.
Recent news coverage of riots has focused primarily on facial recognition – and how Civilian And Local law enforcement agency Authorities conducted their own facial recognition survey to support the FBI with the help of social media. However, the bill reveals that the FBI relies on a variety of other technologies, including license plate readers, police body cameras, and cell phone tracking. Civil rights watchdogs like ACLU are also concerned that the same technology used to monitor riots could prevent protesters from exercising their first amendment. ..
The Capitol riot was an exceptional event – For the first time in centuries The rebels broke through the center of the US federal government. Many of the people monitored and prosecuted belonged to the white supremacist group. However, according to Dave Maass of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a non-profit organization that advocates freedom of speech and digital privacy, the level of surveillance was “overkill.”
For example Request for documents William Vogel of Polling, NY, shows that “a lot of tales” contacted the FBI when he recognized him in a Snapchat video allegedly posted to his account during the riots. It was.
The FBI also tracked his car from his home to the riot, despite having video evidence that Vogel participated in the riot. Automatic license plate reader (ALPR). ALPR uses artificial intelligence to record the license plate of each car passing through a particular camera. It can be installed in fixed locations such as police cars and street lights. When someone registers a vehicle, that identification is associated with the license plate number, allowing law enforcement agencies to attach their ID to the vehicle. Custom google search Law enforcement agencies have used ALPR to track alleged parliamentary riots in at least five cases, according to Justice Department records.
The use of ALPR has expanded nationwide over the last decade, making it easier for law enforcement agencies to track individual vehicles from state to state, as in Vogel. 2011 survey We found that about three-quarters of 70 law enforcement agencies already have ALPR and 85% plan to increase their use over the next five years.
Statistics suggest ALPR scans license plates at least 1 billion times each year in the United States, with the majority of scans Not associated In crime. ACLU has Fought for legislation ALPR is often used to track and store data on people who have not been accused of crime.Local publications at Long Beach last year report Police in Pasadena and Riverside used ALPR to flag Black Lives Matter protesters.
I also have a camera (BWC) worn by the police Played a role To Multiple Investigation of the Parliamentary riots. BWC Soaring in the U.S. As part of an effort to increase police accountability. While much of the debate surrounding BWC over the past few years has focused on police surveillance, cameras are often used instead as a tool for police to monitor civilians.
These cameras may violate the activities of the Legal First Amendment.according to To NPR And progressiveKlee Benally, an indigenous rights activist, was arrested in 2018 based on BWC footage three weeks after rallying for Indigenous Peoples Day in Flagstaff, Arizona. The protests blocked traffic, and investigators used BWC footage to determine which protesters caused the traffic jam.
Miami police too Used BWC video Arrest BLM protesters weeks after the event. ACLU Recommended That such footage should not be acceptable evidence in the case of the first amended protest. Parliamentary riots are not subject to initial amendment protests as participants illegally break into government buildings. However, DC Metropolitan Police are allowed to use body camera footage as evidence to arrest protesters participating in free speech activities.Illegal activity“.
Surveillance tools were used to monitor the mostly white crowds of the Capitol during riots, but with investigations News report Have Shown Black demonstrators are monitored during protests and are more likely to be arrested for protest-related breaches than white demonstrators.
Christian Davenport, a professor of political science at the University of Michigan, Led a study of over 15,000 protests Between 1960 and 1990, we investigated whether race was a factor in the police response to the protest. Researchers have found the following:
[W]Compared to other groups, African-American protesters are more likely to attract the presence of police, who arrest them, use force and violence, and use African-American protests at protest events. You are more likely to use force and violence in combination with arrest. “
In addition to concerns about privacy and racial injustice, Mars pointed out that surveillance seemed to have replaced real-time police work, rather than keeping the Capitol more secure during the attack.
“I was definitely sitting in front of the computer watching the live and wondering,” Where are the policemen? ” No one was kicking people out, “he said. “All surveillance around the world didn’t help prevent what happened … it helps them clear up the mess later. Surveillance It is not a substitute for judgment. “
How US Capitol Attack Monitoring Methods Can Be Used Against Protesters | Capitol Violations
Source link How US Capitol Attack Monitoring Methods Can Be Used Against Protesters | Capitol Violations