Pittsburgh

Jan. 6 panel votes to hold Steve Bannon in contempt – Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 2021-10-19 20:09:00 –

A House committee investigating the parliamentary turmoil on January 6 congresses former White House aide Steve Bannon on Tuesday after former President Donald Trump’s longtime ally opposes the subpoena of documents and testimony. It was unanimously approved to be charged with insult. That day, Parliament Building, Trump actively sought to block the Commission’s work by instructing Bannon and others not to answer the investigation questions. Trump also filed a proceeding in an attempt to prevent Congress from obtaining previous White House documents. However, lawmakers gathered facts and testimony about attacks involving Trump supporters who injured dozens of police officers, ran lawmakers for their lives, and proved President Joe Biden’s victory. They made it clear that they wouldn’t retreat because they interrupted. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss, said Tuesday that Banon “stands alone, completely ignoring our subpoena,” and that the panel will not refuse the answer. He said Banon “may be willing to be a martyr for the shameful cause of whitening what happened on January 6-demonstrating his full loyalty to the former president.” However, the contempt vote is a warning to other witnesses. Mr. Thompson added. The vote on Tuesday evening sends a resolution of contempt to Full House, which will vote on Thursday’s bill. Home approval sends the matter to the Justice Department, which decides whether to pursue criminal accusations against Banon. The contempt resolution is protected by the privileges of the former presidential palace, so even if Trump’s lawyer insists that Banon should not disclose information, the former Trump’s aide and podcast host will have a committee. It claims that there is no legal position to refuse. The Commission noted that Banon, who was fired from a White House job in 2017, was a civilian when he spoke to Trump before the attack. And Trump does not claim such executive privilege on the panel itself, lawmakers said. Liz Cheney, a member of the Wyoming State Assembly, one of the two Republicans on the commission, said: January 6th. And we reach that bottom. The Commission testified to Banon for his apparent role at the January 6 event, including communication with Trump prior to the siege and his efforts to focus the former president on January 6. He says he is pursuing. The president’s vote and his comment on January 5th, “All hell will be unleashed” the next day. Banon “seems to have played multiple roles related to this investigation, including his role in building and participating in the” stop theft “public relations that motivated the attack,” and “prior to January 6”. His efforts to plan political and other activities in “” the Commission wrote in a resolution recommending contempt. The Biden White House rejected Banon’s allegations, and Deputy Adviser Jonathan Sue wrote to Banon’s lawyer this week: For deposition. Biden’s judgment that executive privilege is not justified “applies to your client’s testimony testimony and any document that your client may own,” Sue wrote. Last week, when asked if the Justice Department should prosecute those who refused to testify, Biden said. However, the Justice Department quickly opposed, and a spokesman said the Justice Department would make its own decisions. Banon said a court order was required before complying with the subpoena, but former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and former White House and Pentagon aide Kashap Patel negotiated with the Commission. There is. It is unclear whether a fourth former White House aide, Dan Scavino, will follow, and the Commission has also subpoenized more than 12 people who helped plan a Trump rally prior to the siege. , And some of them have already submitted documents to testify. The vote took place the day after Trump sued the Commission and the National Archives of Japan to fight the release of the documents requested by the Commission. Trump’s proceedings filed after Biden said he would allow the document to be published alleged that the panel’s August request was overly broad and “a nasty and illegal fishing expedition.” Trump’s proceedings aim to invalidate the entire request of Congress, calling it an overly widespread, overly burdensome, and challenge to the separation of powers. It demands a court injunction prohibiting archivists from creating documents. When the Biden administration organized documents for release, the violent siege of the Capitol more than nine months ago was in an unusual situation that usually deserved the privilege of protecting White House communications. Said there was. Zeke Miller, Nomaan Merchant, and Eric Tucker contributed to this report.

A House committee investigating the contempt of Congress on January 6 unanimously on Tuesday after former President Donald Trump’s long-time ally opposed a subpoena of documents and testimony, Steve, a former White House aide.・ It was resolved that Banon would be charged with contempt of Congress.

Trump, still defending his supporters who broke into the Capitol that day, sought to proactively thwart the Commission’s work by instructing Bannon and others not to answer the investigation questions. Trump also filed a proceeding in an attempt to prevent Congress from obtaining previous White House documents.

But lawmakers injured dozens of police officers, ran lawmakers for their lives, and provided facts and testimony about attacks involving Trump supporters who hampered President Joe Biden’s proof of victory. I will collect it, so I made it clear that I will not retreat.

Democratic Party Rep. Bennie Thompson, chairman of the committee, said on Tuesday that Banon “stands alone, completely ignoring the subpoena,” and that the panel will not refuse to answer.

Banon may be “willing to be a martyr for the shameful cause of whitening what happened on January 6, that is, to show full loyalty to the former president,” but the contempt vote He said it was a warning to other witnesses.

“We are not deterred, we are not distracted, and we are not late,” Thompson added.

The vote on Tuesday evening sends an insulting resolution to the Full House. Full House will vote on Thursday’s bill. Home approval sends the matter to the Justice Department, which decides whether to pursue criminal accusations against Banon.

The contempt resolution is protected by the privileges of the former presidential palace, so even if Trump’s lawyer insists that Banon should not disclose information, the former Trump’s aide and podcast host will have a committee. It claims that there is no legal position to refuse. The Commission noted that Banon, who was fired from a White House job in 2017, was a civilian when he spoke to Trump before the attack. And Trump does not claim such executive privilege on the panel itself, lawmakers said.

Liz Cheney, a member of the Wyoming State Assembly, one of the two Republicans on the commission, said: January 6th. And we reach that bottom. ”

The Commission pursues Banon’s testimony for his apparent role at the January 6 event, including communication with Trump prior to the siege and his efforts to focus the former president on January 6. Say you are. The president’s vote and his comment on January 5th, “All hell will be unleashed” the next day.

“It appears that Banon has played multiple roles related to this investigation, including his role in building and participating in the” stop theft “public relations that motivated the attack,” “prior to January 6.” His efforts to plan political and other activities in “” the Commission wrote in a resolution recommending contempt.

The Biden White House rejected Banon’s allegations, and Deputy Adviser Jonathan Sue told Banon’s lawyers this week, “At this time, we are not aware of why our clients refused to appear in the testimony.” Biden’s judgment that executive privilege is not justified “applies to your client’s testimony and any document that your client may own,” Sue wrote.

Last week, when asked if the Justice Department should prosecute those who refused to testify, Biden said. However, the Justice Department quickly opposed, and a spokesman said the Justice Department would make its own decisions.

Banon said a court order was required before complying with the subpoena, but former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and former White House and Pentagon aide Kashap Patel negotiated with the Commission. There is. It is unclear if the fourth former White House aide, Dan Scavino, will follow.

The Commission has also summoned more than a dozen people who helped plan Trump’s rally prior to the siege, and some of them have already submitted documents to testify.

The vote took place the day after Trump sued the Commission and the National Archives of Japan to fight the release of the documents requested by the Commission. Trump’s proceedings filed after Biden said he would allow the document to be published alleged that the panel’s August request was overly broad and “a nasty and illegal fishing expedition.” Trump’s proceedings aim to invalidate the entire request of Congress, calling it an overly widespread, overly burdensome, and challenge to the separation of powers. It demands a court injunction prohibiting archivists from creating documents.

The violent siege of the Capitol more than nine months ago, when the Biden administration was organizing documents for release, was an extraordinary situation that usually deserved the privilege of protecting White House communications. Said that.

___

Associated Press writers Jill Corbin, Colleen Long, Zeke Miller, Noman Merchant, and Eric Tucker contributed to this report.

Jan. 6 panel votes to hold Steve Bannon in contempt Source link Jan. 6 panel votes to hold Steve Bannon in contempt

Back to top button