Jan. 6 panel votes to hold Steve Bannon in contempt – The Denver Post – Denver, Colorado

Denver, Colorado 2021-10-19 22:25:31 –


Washington (AP) — The House Commission investigating the contempt of Congress on January 6 unanimously ex-White on Tuesday after former President Donald Trump’s longtime ally opposed the subpoena of documents and testimony. House aide Steve Bannon has resolved to be accused of contempt of Congress.

Trump, still defending his supporters who broke into the Capitol that day, sought to proactively thwart the Commission’s work by instructing Bannon and others not to answer the investigation questions. Trump also filed a proceeding in an attempt to prevent Congress from obtaining previous White House documents.

But lawmakers injured dozens of police officers, ran lawmakers for their lives, and provided facts and testimony about attacks involving Trump supporters who hampered President Joe Biden’s proof of victory. I will collect it, so I made it clear that I will not retreat.

Democratic Party Rep. Bennie Thompson, chairman of the committee, said on Tuesday that Banon “stands alone, completely ignoring the subpoena,” and that the panel will not refuse to answer.

He may say that Banon is “willing to be a martyr for the shameful cause of whitening what happened on January 6, showing full loyalty to the former president.” He said the contempt vote was a warning to other witnesses.

“We are not deterred, we are not distracted, and we are not late,” Thompson said.

The vote on Tuesday evening sends an insulting resolution to the Full House. Full House will vote on Thursday’s bill. Home approval sends the matter to the Justice Department, which decides whether to pursue criminal accusations against Banon.

The contempt resolution is protected by the privileges of the former presidential palace, so even if Trump’s lawyer insists that Banon should not disclose information, the former Trump’s aide and podcast host will have a committee. It claims that there is no legal position to refuse. The Commission noted that Banon, who was fired from a White House job in 2017, was a civilian when he spoke to Trump before the attack. And Trump does not claim such executive privilege on the panel itself, lawmakers said.

Wyoming MP Liz Cheney, one of only two Republicans on the Commission and a rare GOP critic of Trump, said Bannon and Trump’s privilege debate was held by the former president at the event of the day. He said it suggests that he was “personally involved” in planning and execution.

“We will be at the root of that,” said Chainy.

The Commission, due to his reported communication with Trump prior to the siege, his efforts to focus on parliamentary certification of the January 6 vote, and his comments on January 5. He says he is pursuing Banon’s testimony. The next day, you will be unleashed. “

“It appears that Banon has played multiple roles related to this investigation, including his role in building and participating in the” stop theft “public relations that motivated the attack,” “prior to January 6.” His efforts to plan political and other activities in “” the Commission wrote in a resolution recommending contempt.

The Biden White House also rejected Banon’s allegations, and Deputy Adviser Jonathan Sue told Banon’s lawyers this week, “At this time, we are not aware of why our clients refused to appear in the testimony.” Biden’s judgment that executive privilege is not justified “applies to your client’s testimony and any document that your client may own,” Sue wrote.

Last week, when asked if the Justice Department should prosecute those who refused to testify, Biden said. However, the Justice Department quickly opposed, and a spokesman said the Justice Department would make its own decisions.

Banon said a court order was required before complying with the subpoena, but former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and former White House and Pentagon aide Kashap Patel negotiated with the Commission. There is. The panel also summoned more than a dozen people who helped plan Trump’s rally prior to the siege, and some of them have already submitted documents to testify.

Maryland Congressman Jamie Raskin said that all other witnesses summoned, like Banon, “do not just blow us away, but obey or act in good faith.” ..

The Commission also conducts voluntary, private interviews with other witnesses who have appeared earlier or who have responded immediately to their request.

For some witnesses, Ruskin said, “If they are involved in these events, it is a privilege and a real opportunity for them to start compensation.” Some of them “have a terrible feeling about the role they played,” he said.

Still, there is a possibility that more derogatory votes will come out in the future.

“I won’t go into the details before and after, but say our patience isn’t endless,” said Adam Kinzinger, another Republican member of the panel, Illinois Congressman Adam Kinzinger. I talked about.

The vote took place the day after Trump sued the Commission and the National Archives of Japan to fight the release of the documents requested by the Commission. Trump’s proceedings filed after Biden said he would allow the document to be published alleged that the panel’s August request was overly broad and “a nasty and illegal fishing expedition.”

Trump’s proceedings aim to invalidate the entire request of Congress, calling it an overly widespread, overly burdensome, and challenge to the separation of powers. It demands a court injunction prohibiting archivists from creating documents.

The violent siege of the Capitol more than nine months ago, when the Biden administration was organizing documents for release, was an extraordinary situation that usually deserved the privilege of protecting White House communications. Said that.


Associated Press writers Jill Corbin, Colleen Long, Zeke Miller, Noman Merchant, and Eric Tucker contributed to this report.

Jan. 6 panel votes to hold Steve Bannon in contempt – The Denver Post Source link Jan. 6 panel votes to hold Steve Bannon in contempt – The Denver Post

Back to top button