USA

Judge dismisses claim against Trump White House for liquidation of Lafayette Square: NPR

President Donald Trump, who visited the outside of St. John’s Church on June 1, 2020, across from Lafayette Park from the White House, holds the Bible.

Patrick Semanski / AP


Hide captions

Switch captions

Patrick Semanski / AP

President Donald Trump, who visited the outside of St. John’s Church on June 1, 2020, across from Lafayette Park from the White House, holds the Bible.

Patrick Semanski / AP

Federal Judge has been dismissed Former White House officials last year forced the removal of peaceful protesters from Lafayette Square in Washington, DC, and could pose a photo of then-President Donald Trump holding the Bible in a nearby church. He claims to have colluded to do so.

The proceedings will begin on June 1, 2020. U.S. Park Police and National Guard have mostly dispersed peaceful rallies Protesters of Black Lives Matter using tear gas and pepper spray from the square near the White House.

Trump, accompanied by then Attorney General William Barr, Secretary of Defense Mark Esper, and General Mark Milley, Chairman of the United States Chairman of the General Staff, stepped into the Anglican Church of St. John opposite the square where the photo was taken.

Black Lives Matter and three other plaintiffs, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, have four duplicate proceedings in which former president, Barr, and other Trump administration officials violate opposition civil rights. Claimed to have colluded for.

Last month, the Justice Department requested Judge Doveney Friedrich of the US District Court to dismiss the proceedings.

On Monday, Friedrich called the plaintiff’s allegations speculative and dismissed allegations against Barr, US Park Police Chief Gregory Monaghan, and other federal authorities.

Inside her ArbitrageFriedrich, Trump’s appointed man, wrote that plaintiffs could not prove an agreement or plan that infringed the rights of the protesters.

“These allegations are considered true and do not represent sufficient” events, conversations, or mental meetings “to violate among the defendants. [plaintiffs’] Rights based on [their] Protected class membership, “she said.

At that time, President Donald Trump will leave the White House on June 1, 2020 to visit outside the Church of St. John’s in Washington. Walking behind Trump from the left is former Secretary of Defense William Barr, former Attorney General Mark Esper, and the co-chief of the staff.

Patrick Semanski / AP


Hide captions

Switch captions

Patrick Semanski / AP

At that time, President Donald Trump will leave the White House on June 1, 2020 to visit outside the Church of St. John’s in Washington. Walking behind Trump from the left is former Secretary of Defense William Barr, former Attorney General Mark Esper, and the co-chief of the staff.

Patrick Semanski / AP

The ACLU said the forced removal of the square could have a chilling effect on free speech, but Friedrich refused.

“Plaintiffs continue to demonstrate in or near Lafayette Square, claiming that law enforcement officers are afraid of breaking up or attacking them,” she wrote.

“The main basis for plaintiffs of these fears is the alleged event on June 1, 2020 and President Trump’s social media posts before and after the liquidation of Lafayette Square,” she continued. “Importantly, plaintiffs do not rely on the alleged law or policy as the basis for this alleged risk of future harm.”

The judge also ruled that Bar, Monaghan, etc. were not affected by the civil proceedings and could not be sued for damages.

In a tweet, the ACLU of the District of Columbia “not only represents the value of the First Amendment and the surprising refusal of protesters’ rights, but also opens the door to future violence by the federal government. , Place effectively. ” Federal authorities beyond the law. “

One allegation against federal defendants remains: Judge Friedrich challenges continued restrictions on access to Lafayette Square because plaintiffs “allege suspicion of ongoing injuries.” Said that it could be done.

“From the June 1 incident to today, more than a year later, Lafayette Square has been subject to strict restrictions that regularly restrict access to the Protesters’ Square,” she said. “Despite the change of power, federal defendants do not meet the high standard of showing that this allegation was discussed by subsequent events.”

David Cutler, a judicial attorney at the Justice Department, said last month police acted legally in search of dismissal of the proceedings, saying that the president’s security is the government’s “most important” interest. According to the Washington Post.

Earlier this month, Interior Ministry Inspector General Mark Greene Bratt, Conclusion US park police did not wipe out protesters from the square, especially for Trump’s photo shoot.

“”[T]His evidence proved that relevant USPP officials made those decisions and began implementing operational plans hours before they learned of the possibility of a presidential visit to the park later that day. ” Greenblatt said. I wrote in a statement.



Judge dismisses claim against Trump White House for liquidation of Lafayette Square: NPR

Source link Judge dismisses claim against Trump White House for liquidation of Lafayette Square: NPR

Back to top button