The high-profile $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit between Dominion Voting Systems and Fox begins a day behind schedule. The judge announced he would oversee the case on Sunday night, amid a report on settlement talks, hours before the first arguments began on Monday. .
The trial has been rescheduled to start Tuesday. Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis, who is overseeing the case, declined to say why the trial was delayed. “The court has decided to continue the trial, including jury selection, until 9:00 a.m. Tuesday, April 18, 2023. We will make such an announcement tomorrow.” [Monday] In a statement released through a court spokesperson, he said at 9 a.m. in courtroom 7E.
The Wall Street Journal, citing a person familiar with the matter, said: report on sunday That Fox pushed afterward to settle the case out of court. Reuters also reported that the delay was due to settlement talks, according to a source familiar with the matter. washington post, citing two sources. Spokespeople for Fox and Dominion did not immediately seek comment.
The announcement was made on a quiet Sunday night in Wilmington, the venue for the trial, because Fox, like many U.S. companies, is incorporated in Delaware, which has generous tax benefits. rice field. One or two of her reporters were seen televising outside the courthouse on Sunday afternoon.
Dominion is asking a Delaware jury to seek $1.6 billion in damages. This is because Fox deliberately or recklessly ignored the truth when it broadcast outlandish lies about voting machines. Lawsuits rarely go to court.
Experts say Dominion’s case is very strong. It has received national attention because it represents one of the most aggressive efforts to hold Fox or anyone else accountable for spreading misinformation about the 2020 election. The Dominion produced a ton of internal communications from Fox employees stating that they knew what they were broadcasting was false.
The trial is expected to be a blockbuster, with top Fox executives Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch expected to testify in person, along with top Fox hosts Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson and Maria Bartillomo. , Janine Pirro.
Fox accused the Dominion of being picky about evidence, arguing it defended the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and claimed that a Dominion victory would lead to more lawsuits against the media and better protection for the media in the United States. claim to weaken. Some experts share that concern. “Unfortunately, if Fox loses, there will be a significant increase in defamation lawsuits against all news organizations,” said Jane, a professor at the University of Minnesota and former executive director of the Press Committee for Press Freedom. Cartley said. , wrote in an email.
Other experts say the evidence against Fox is so strong that the case shows that existing media standards provide effective protections that outlets can hold accountable for. It is said that there is a nature
“The important question here is whether Dominion is seeking to water down constitutional standards. Everything I’ve done suggests it’s the latter,” says Ronnell Andersen-Jones, First Revisionist at the University of Utah.
Summarize this content to 100 words The high-profile $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit between Dominion Voting Systems and Fox begins a day behind schedule. The judge announced he would oversee the case on Sunday night, amid a report on settlement talks, hours before the first arguments began on Monday. .The trial has been rescheduled to start Tuesday. Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis, who is overseeing the case, declined to say why the trial was delayed. “The court has decided to continue the trial, including jury selection, until 9:00 a.m. Tuesday, April 18, 2023. We will make such an announcement tomorrow.” [Monday] In a statement released through a court spokesperson, he said at 9 a.m. in courtroom 7E.The Wall Street Journal, citing a person familiar with the matter, said: report on sunday That Fox pushed afterward to settle the case out of court. Reuters also reported that the delay was due to settlement talks, according to a source familiar with the matter. washington post, citing two sources. Spokespeople for Fox and Dominion did not immediately seek comment.The announcement was made on a quiet Sunday night in Wilmington, the venue for the trial, because Fox, like many U.S. companies, is incorporated in Delaware, which has generous tax benefits. rice field. One or two of her reporters were seen televising outside the courthouse on Sunday afternoon.Dominion is asking a Delaware jury to seek $1.6 billion in damages. This is because Fox deliberately or recklessly ignored the truth when it broadcast outlandish lies about voting machines. Lawsuits rarely go to court.Experts say Dominion’s case is very strong. It has received national attention because it represents one of the most aggressive efforts to hold Fox or anyone else accountable for spreading misinformation about the 2020 election. The Dominion produced a ton of internal communications from Fox employees stating that they knew what they were broadcasting was false.The trial is expected to be a blockbuster, with top Fox executives Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch expected to testify in person, along with top Fox hosts Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson and Maria Bartillomo. , Janine Pirro.Fox accused the Dominion of being picky about evidence, arguing it defended the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and claimed that a Dominion victory would lead to more lawsuits against the media and better protection for the media in the United States. claim to weaken. Some experts share that concern. “Unfortunately, if Fox loses, there will be a significant increase in defamation lawsuits against all news organizations,” said Jane, a professor at the University of Minnesota and former executive director of the Press Committee for Press Freedom. Cartley said. , wrote in an email.Other experts say the evidence against Fox is so strong that the case shows that existing media standards provide effective protections that outlets can hold accountable for. It is said that there is a nature“The important question here is whether Dominion is seeking to water down constitutional standards. Everything I’ve done suggests it’s the latter,” says Ronnell Andersen-Jones, First Revisionist at the University of Utah.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/apr/17/judge-delays-dominion-and-fox-news-trial-until-tuesday Judge stays trial for Dominion and Fox News amid report on settlement talks. Fox News-Dominion Incident