Atlanta, Georgia 2020-11-19 18:39:00 –
Arizona and Pennsylvania federal judges and Georgia federal judges rejected election-related proceedings from the Republican Party and the Trump campaign on Thursday.
The hat trick of defeat is the latest defeat of the Trump campaign in long-term and increasingly far-reaching bids to prevent Joe Biden’s victory in the presidential election before the electoral college recognizes him as president-elect. did.
One of the judges, Mr. Trump of Georgia, called the Republican Alliance attorney’s attempt to block the election results “very impressive” and rejected attempts to block Biden’s victory.
In Arizona, state judges audited votes in the state, refused to delay finalizing the results, and said the proceedings could not be amended and filed again. And in Pennsylvania, a state judge ordered more than 2,000 absentee votes that the Trump campaign wanted to exclude.
The verdict came on Thursday in just a few hours between them.
Losses in the Trump campaign came when nine proceedings from the Trump campaign or his allies were rejected or withdrawn last Friday, and four proceedings in which Trump-supporting voters promoted fraudulent allegations earlier this week. It has piled up on other recent days, such as when it was withdrawn.
Most viable post-election cases of the Trump campaign could steal Biden’s electoral vote and become president, even though Trump campaign attorneys (including Rudy Giuliani) promised to continue the fight There are no left. Legal analysts widely say that all Trump court bids to change election results will fail.
Currently, one of Giuliani’s federal proceedings is protracted in Pennsylvania, but a judge considering it expressed suspicion on Tuesday that the federal president’s vote should be abandoned.
Arizona judges have dismissed the Arizona Republican proceedings seeking a broader audit of the votes cast on election days, warning that county lawyers could delay the certification of state votes.
In a simple order, Judge John Hannah prejudicedly dismissed the proceedings and prevented the party’s hometown of Phoenix and the state’s most populous county, Maricopa County, from proving election results. Rejected the request for an injunction.
CNN said Joe Biden in the presidential election won Arizona with more than 10,000 votes, an estimated 99% of constituencies reported as of Thursday night, and Democrats carry Arizona in the presidential election in more than 70 years Is predicted to be the second time.
The Arizona Republican Party claimed that the Secretary of State’s manual violated state law. This is because the polling place random sampling effort was based on the polling place, not the constituency.
The order represents yet another proceeding dismissed by the court as the Republicans seek to challenge the outcome of the elections on the battlefield on the basis of widespread fraudulent voting and unfounded allegations of election fraud. Last week, Trump campaign lawyers withdrew a lawsuit seeking a review of all votes cast on election day after discovering that the margin of victory in the Arizona presidential election could not be overcome.
According to a report submitted to the Secretary of State, more than half of all Arizona counties conducted post-election audits and found no inconsistencies or microscopic issues that did not affect the results.
Audits in the four largest counties in Arizona, which account for 86% of all votes for the president of Arizona, found no evidence of systematic fraudulent voting that President Donald Trump complained about. No irregularities were found in Maricopa County. Officials in Pima County, home of Tucson, audited a random sample of 4,239 votes in the presidential election and found only a two-vote discrepancy.
Jeff Burgan, director of communications for Arizona in the Biden campaign, said the proceeding was “flirty and legitimately dismissed.”
“Arizona’s elections are smooth and transparent, and the Arizona Republican far-right fringe should stop undermining Arizona’s confidence in free and fair elections,” Burgan added.
Arizona Republican Chairman Kelly Ward denounced the order on Thursday and updated the audit call. “I support my call for a complete manual audit of the state’s election results,” Ward said in a statement, but did not explicitly confirm that the party would appeal.
County attorney Joseph Larou said in court that the county’s ballot deadline is Monday, and delays could affect the state’s ability to meet the electoral college’s deadline. The state certification deadline is November 30th. The Electoral College will vote on December 14th.
Hannah also said that Arizona’s Secretary of State could seek reimbursement of statutory costs.
A state judge in Pennsylvania has rejected an attempt to abandon more than 2,000 absentee votes from the Trump campaign for technical reasons.
The Trump campaign made several attempts in a Pennsylvania court to revoke absentee ballots, and on Thursday Judge Robert Baldi of the Backcounty Common Pleia Court ruled that absentee ballots would disqualify voters Did.
This case was not among those claimed by the Trump campaign for fraud. Instead, the campaign argues that rules about when absentee ballots should and should not be counted should be enforced, either in unsealed privacy envelopes or on outer envelopes. I had a problem with 2,177 votes in the backcountry without a handwritten date, name or address.
Those votes are counted, Bardi ordered.
The Trump campaign has lost several similar bids attacking a small number of absentee votes in the other two counties.
Bardi said in his opinion Thursday that fraud was not a problem.
“The parties should be aware that the vote specifically stipulated in the comprehensive provision of the fact that there is no evidence of fraud, fraud, or fraud with respect to the voted vote. There is nothing. The conclusion is that one of the disputed votes was submitted by someone who is or is not eligible to vote in this election, “he wrote. “The petitioner has never presented any evidence or claim against it.”
A federal judge in Georgia has dismissed an election proceeding filed by Republican elector Lynn Wood, who alleged unconstitutional courts, recognized fraud in the presidential election, and tried to prevent proof of election results.
“There is no doubt that individual voting rights are sacred,” Judge Stephen Grimberg of the Northern District of Georgia said Thursday night. But that does not mean that individual voters have the right to decide how they will be voted or counted.
“The court will not interfere,” he added.
Wood’s lawyer said earlier Thursday that he might want to try a second round in front of the judge on behalf of the Trump campaign trying to prevent Biden’s victory. However, Thursday’s Grimberg ruling, spoken from the bench, shuts down a new round of proceedings in multiple ways.
Grimberg determined that Georgia electors had no ability to show that they could file a proceeding, had no means of appearing in court under the law, and were too late to influence the elections.
Mr. Trump’s appointed Grimberg said, “I haven’t heard any justification for why plaintiffs postponed this claim until two weeks after the elections and until the results of these elections were proven. “. He said the absentee ballot in Georgia, which the Republicans challenged in the proceedings, began a few months ago.
CNN’s Erica Orden, Bob Ortega, Marshall Cohen and Dan Merica contributed to this report.
Judges toss Republican lawsuits in Arizona, Pennsylvania and Georgia | News Source link Judges toss Republican lawsuits in Arizona, Pennsylvania and Georgia | News