New Orleans

Justice Department sues Texas over redistricting map – New Orleans, Louisiana

New Orleans, Louisiana 2021-12-06 16:24:00 –

The Justice Department has sued Texas over a new constituency change map on Monday, saying it plans to discriminate against very black and Latin voters who have fueled the state’s population boom. Voting Rights Act in creating new maps for parliamentary delegations and state legislatures. This case is the first case in which the Biden Department of Justice challenges the state map during this subdivision cycle. In the proceedings, most of Texas’s population growth over the last decade was due to blacks, Latinos, and Asians, but the new map was drawn by the state’s Republicans, who have brought their own to these communities. It does not give a new opportunity to choose a representative. Instead, maps pack black and Latin communities into strangely shaped districts. The Dallas area is called the “seahorse” shape. “This isn’t the first time Texas has acted to minimize voting rights for minority citizens,” Attorney General Merrick Garland said in a press conference with Under Secretary of Justice Banita Gupta. .. “Ten years later, the court admitted that Texas had deliberately weakened the voting power of Latin and black voters and enacted a constituency change plan that violated the Voting Rights Act.” The lawsuit was tortured by the Republicans. It cites several parliamentary districts that have been delineated. Black and Latin voters in the party’s parliamentary district In the highly competitive 23rd district of western Texas, the map cuts out areas near El Paso and San Antonio, reducing the proportion of residents of Latin voting age by 9%. rice field. In the Dallas area, blacks and Latins in the northwestern suburbs have been separated from Congressman Beth van Duin’s district. Last year, Congressman Beth Van Duin won a small bid for re-election against a democratic black Latin candidate. In the Houston area, where the proportion of whites is declining, the map maintained 6 of the 10 house districts as white majority or multiple districts. It came into force in 1965, but a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court ruling invalidated the Voting Rights Act provisions requiring the Legal Department to approve maps in Texas and other states with a history of racism. rice field. , Ken Paxton accused the proceedings of invasion by the Democratic Party of Japan. “The absurd proceedings of the Justice Department against our state are the latest Biden administration’s tactics to control voters in Texas,” Paton tweeted. “I’m convinced that our parliamentary constituency change decision has proved legal and this ridiculous attempt to shake democracy will fail.” The US Supreme Court said in 2019. It ruled that it would not refer to the party’s Gerrymandering dispute (a map drawn to benefit political parties). However, federal courts remain open to racial gerrymandering claims. Article 2 of the Voting Rights Act prohibits mappers from diluting minority voting rights by distributing them across districts and preventing them from choosing their candidates. “The state legislature has refused to recognize the growing minority voters in the state,” the proceedings allege. “The delegation of the Texas Parliament has expanded from 36 to 38, but Texas has designed two new seats to have a majority in Anglo-Saxon.”

The Justice Department sued Texas on Monday over a new constituency change map, saying the plan was discriminating against very black and Latin voters who fueled the state’s population boom.

A lawsuit filed in the Western District of Texas alleges that Republican-controlled states violated part of the Voting Rights Act in creating new maps for parliamentary delegations and state legislatures. This case is the first case in which the Biden Department of Justice challenges the state map during this subdivision cycle.

In the proceedings, most of Texas’ population growth over the last decade has been due to blacks, Latinos, and Asians, but new maps drawn by state Republicans select their representatives for these communities. Not giving new opportunities.

Instead, maps pack black and Latin communities into strangely shaped districts. The Dallas area, called the “seahorse” form, maintains a safe seat for white Republicans.

“This isn’t the first time Texas has acted to minimize voting rights for minority citizens,” Attorney General Banita Gupta said in a press conference with Attorney General Merrick Garland. “Ten years later, the court admitted that Texas deliberately weakened the voting power of Latin and black voters and enacted a constituency change plan that violated the Voting Rights Act.”

The proceedings cite several parliamentary districts where Republicans have drawn lines tortured to reduce the proportion of black and Latin voters in the party’s parliamentary districts.

In the highly competitive 23rd district of western Texas, the map cut out areas near El Paso and San Antonio, reducing the proportion of residents of Latin voting age by 9%. In the Dallas area, blacks and Latins in the northwestern suburbs have been separated from Congressman Beth van Duin’s district. Last year, Congressman Beth Van Duin won a small bid for re-election against a democratic black Latin candidate. In the Houston area, where the proportion of whites is declining, the map held six of the ten house districts as white majority or multiple districts.

Texas has had to defend the map in court after all constituency change processes since the Voting Rights Act came into force in 1965, but a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court ruling led to Texas. The provisions of the Voting Rights Act that require such things have been invalidated. States with a history of racism have the Legal Department approve the map.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has accused the proceedings of invasion by the democratic government. “The absurd proceedings of the Justice Department against our state are the latest Biden administration’s tactics to control voters in Texas,” Paton tweeted. “I am convinced that our parliamentary constituency change decision has proved legal and this ridiculous attempt to shake democracy will fail.”

The proceedings also unfold in the midst of changing legal circumstances to reorganize the agenda. In 2019, the US Supreme Court ruled that it would not try the party’s Gerrymandering dispute. This is a map drawn to benefit political parties.

However, federal courts remain open to racial gerrymandering claims. Article 2 of the Voting Rights Act prohibits mappers from diluting their voting rights by distributing minorities across districts and preventing them from selecting their candidates.

It alleges that the proceedings were done by Texas Republicans. “The state legislature has refused to recognize the growing minority voters in the state,” the proceedings allege. “The delegation of the Texas Parliament has expanded from 36 to 38, but Texas has designed two new seats to have a majority in Anglo-Saxon.”

Justice Department sues Texas over redistricting map Source link Justice Department sues Texas over redistricting map

Back to top button