St. Louis, Missouri 2021-06-01 10:12:00 –
Washington (AP) — Supreme Court retired $ 2 billion decision I agree with women who claim to have developed ovarian cancer through the use of Johnson & Johnson talc products.
The judge did not comment on Tuesday about dismissing Johnson & Johnson’s appeal. The company faced a trial involving 22 cancer patients from 12 states and different backgrounds. Insisted that it was not treated fairly.
Missouri Jury First awarded $ 4.7 billion to womenHowever, the State Court of Appeals excluded the two women from the proceedings and reduced the arbitrage to $ 2 billion. The jury has determined that the company’s talc products contain asbestos, and that talc containing asbestos can cause ovarian cancer. The company disagrees with both points.
Johnson & Johnson, based in New Brunswick, NJ, has stopped selling the iconic talc-based Johnson & Johnson powder in the United States and Canada, but continues to sell it elsewhere.
Judges Samuel Arito and Brett Kavanaugh did not participate in the court action. Arito owns a stake in Johnson & Johnson for $ 15,000 to $ 50,000. Kavanaugh’s father led an industry group that opposed labeling talc with carcinogens and warning talc products.
An ethicist contacted by the Associated Press said the role of E. Edward Kavanaugh did not require his son to withdraw from the proceedings.
Copyright 2021 Associated Press. all rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission.
Justices reject Johnson & Johnson appeal of $2B talc verdict | St. Louis News Headlines Source link Justices reject Johnson & Johnson appeal of $2B talc verdict | St. Louis News Headlines