Kern sees only pricey options for diverting organic waste | News – Bakersfield, California

Bakersfield, California 2021-10-16 22:15:00 –

There is no way around it. Khan’s next venture into the county’s waste stream will be a nuisance.

State law requires counties to halve the amount of organic waste they bury by January 1, but there is some flexibility in deadlines. By 2025, reducing methane emissions will require three-quarters less food, grass, paper and cardboard to go to local landfills.

On Price Tags: Khan’s Public Works Director told the Supervisory Board on Tuesday that the amount the county charges homeowners to cover the costs of transporting and recycling waste is probably up 71 percent annually to $ 180. He said it would be. Companies that hire carriers also have higher costs.

Behind the county’s cost projections is a long-standing study and staff’s desire to balance transportation and operating costs while keeping the local environment clean and avoiding state penalties.

Craig Pope, director of public works, said the county has drastically reduced costs, including closing landfills and transit stations, closing household hazardous waste facilities, and prioritizing inconvenient alternatives. He told the supervisor that he was considering specific measures.

However, staff have concluded that not only will the cost of carriers contracted by the county be significantly reduced, but people and businesses that dispose of a lot of waste will dispose of it where it should be.

“If (if) people need to carry too far, they’re not going to do that,” said the Pope.

Big project

Instead, hundreds of dollars are being proposed, including a $ 20 million compost facility in the Shafter-Wasco area, expansion and improvement of existing treatment facilities, and a new $ 30 million facility for treating organic waste. A $ 10,000 construction project.

Different types of facilities are needed to handle different waste streams. Residents who have separate containers for garbage, recycling and Swill may send organic matter directly to compost. Apart from this, further emphasis is expected on food waste reduction.

However, the county foresaw the great need to remove organic matter from unsorted residential waste streams, which the state and county estimated to account for about 40% of everything households throw away.

The state estimates that county costs jump between $ 25 million and $ 150 million annually. County staff say it’s almost correct.

The local plan has not been finalized. The first staff intends to raise rates and move forward, then ask the supervisory board to approve a concrete plan for the treatment of organic waste. Cal Recycle, California’s Department of Resource Recycling and Recovery, needs to approve the proposed solution. The county is also coordinating solutions with Khan’s corporate city, which is already working on waste disposal and landfill conversion.

A few years ago, the county issued a request for proposal requesting organic waste disposal companies to submit technology for review. There were 9 answers, and the staff selected 3 from them and investigated them in detail.

3 options

Linbrooks, an assistant director of public works, said staff visited San Jose to hire hundreds of people, remove organic matter almost non-stop, and check out a processing line that cooks for a month before composting. Told. It was the most expensive of the three, with an estimated price of about $ 100 million.

In Sunvalley, staff witnessed a process that began with the waste being dumped on the floor and treated with a series of belts. She said the organic matter was “crushed” or compressed to remove the liquid.

“It looks like oatmeal. It smells very bad,” she said, and the material was sent to another facility where it was rehydrated and traditionally treated as wastewater. It was estimated to cost about $ 30 million.

A third technology, fixed at around $ 25 million, will turn organic waste into a potentially marketable product.

Brooks explained that it produces pellets or fluff that can be used as fuel.

“Now we have a usable product for sale,” she said. There was some debate about providing it as a green ingredient to industrial users of coal in the Tehachapi region, she added.

No final decision has been made. “We are still looking,” she said.

“Curve ball”

The Pope told supervisors that taxpayers’ fees and carrier costs had to be balanced and that rate negotiations with the county franchise carriers were ongoing. He said this month that seven local carriers had agreed to sell to Fontana-based Burrtec Waste Industries as a “curve ball.”

CalRecycle said in an email that it is working to train cities and counties on how to comply with their obligations to enter into force within three months. A spokeswoman emphasized that municipalities that miss the deadline or need more time to plan have options.

Spokeswoman Maria West said the state will provide tools, including model ordinances and sample marketing materials for recruitment, to help residents understand the greater value of meeting SB1383 requirements. ..

“The implementation of SB1383 is a more environmentally friendly job for Californians to fight climate change, feed the needy Californians, save the precious water used to grow food, reduce pollution and work. It’s one of the fastest and easiest ways to move the state into the future, “she says. I have written.

Kern sees only pricey options for diverting organic waste | News Source link Kern sees only pricey options for diverting organic waste | News

Back to top button