Lauren Boebert’s campaign amends reimbursement report that raised red flags – Denver, Colorado

Denver, Colorado 2021-02-23 17:32:22 –
Lauren Boebert, MPThe campaign has publicly acknowledged the previous election funding report. Raised an ethical danger signal And led to multiple Survey request — It was inaccurate. Still, the campaign defended large payments to lawmakers.
February 2 Reported by The Denver Post Silt Republican Bobert received a refund of over $ 22,000 in mileage from his campaign account. This is an extraordinary amount of money that several ethics experts have questioned. To justify the redemption, Bobert would have had to drive 38,712 miles last year during a pandemic that restricted several months of travel.
Most of the money was paid on November 11, when Bobert received $ 21,200 from the campaign’s funding for mileage, according to the original report of the campaign submitted in December.
Bobert campaign on Monday Submit amendment report To Federal Election CommissionBobert reiterated that he received $ 21,200 on November 11, claiming that it was a refund for mileage, travel expenses, and hotel stays. According to the campaign, mileage accounted for $ 17,280 in refunds.
“I represent one of the largest districts in the country and I’m proud to have run through every corner to win the election,” Bobert said in a statement on Tuesday. “The refund was for proper travel expenses, as reflected in the filings. We’ll give you more details. There are no changes to the refundable amount or the operating costs of the campaign.”
Bobert called the controversy “almost nothing” and said it occurred to distract the person in charge. Ilhan Omar And Maxine Waters, two Democrats who have I paid my family with election funds..
A few weeks before amending the Election Funds Report, Bobert defended his mileage refund. She spoke to radio station KHOW On February 10, she “absolutely” had a document stating that she had driven the refunded miles.
Bobert’s repayment and post reports filed complaints with the FEC and Parliamentary Ethics Department this month, but neither said they would investigate. Michelle Kupffer Smith, executive director of the Watchdog Group’s accountability campaign, said Bobert’s revised report did not affect the FEC complaint filed on February 8.
“These costs should have been disclosed in her December 3, 2020 report,” Kuppersmith said. “She either didn’t have the required mileage logs, or the treasurer didn’t request the paperwork before reimbursing her for all these costs. The Bobert campaign is unreliable in its FEC report. Having proved that, the FEC needs to properly audit the campaign to determine where else it failed to comply with the law. “
Kyle Herrig, president of the progressive government surveillance group Accountable.US, said the revised submission of the Boebert campaign would not affect OEC complaints. His group submitted on February 4th..
“Our demand for a thorough ethical investigation stands,” Herrig said on Tuesday.
Lauren Boebert’s campaign amends reimbursement report that raised red flags Source link Lauren Boebert’s campaign amends reimbursement report that raised red flags