Lucky 13 in Paris allows Nadal to connect Federer with 20 slam titles – Albuquerque, New Mexico

Albuquerque, New Mexico 2020-10-11 13:20:50 –

“I can’t forget the love story I have in this city and in this courtroom,” Nadal said.

He distracted questions during a post-match court interview about catching Federer and said his focus remained head-on at the French Open.

“Winning here means everything to me, isn’t it? It’s not a moment, to be honest … think about the 20th today,” Nadal said. “Roland Garros means everything to me. Here I spent most of the most important, or most important, moments of my tennis career. That’s no doubt.”

Nadal, who ranked second in the French Open, improved to 100-2, including a total of 26-0 in the semi-finals and finals, and won the title in Paris for the fourth consecutive year. A 34-year-old leftist from Spain won four British Open Championships from 2005 to 2008, five consecutive US Open Championships from 2010 to 2014, and four trophies at Wimbledon and Wimbledon. One at the Australian Open.

Nadal was the first to join Federer in 2003, as each man had a Zero Slam in his name. Federer arrived in Wimbledon for the first time that year. Nadal, of course, won his first victory in France in 2005, when he drew 4-0.

With Djokovic’s defeat, he became 17 majors. If he wins, the trio’s ranking will be displayed as 20-19-18.

“Honestly, it’s a pleasure to share this wonderful tennis era together,” Nadal said. “On the other hand, there has been a tough fight for a long time.”

This is Nadal vs. Djokovic’s 56th installment, the most frequent meeting among any pair of men in his professional days, and the ninth in the Grand Slam final, most comparable to Nadal vs. Federer.

Djokovic has won 14 of the last 18 games against Nadal, leading 29-26 overall, including 6-3, 6-2 and 6-3 wins in the 2019 Australian Open Final. ..

Nadal has now allowed Djokovic one less match.

“In Australia, he killed me …. it was for me today,” Nadal said. “It’s part of the game.”

Important stats for Sunday: Nadal limited his unforced error to 14 with 183 points. This was impressive to everyone, especially to someone with a Djokovic caliber who had accumulated 52.

“I’m not very happy with how I play,” Djokovic said. “But I definitely lost to the (better) player.”

The first set was Nadal’s 45-minute master class. Nadal steered the high-revving forehand exactly where he needed it, and used his defense against attacks to slide, stretch, and flick the ball back. With aggression.

Djokovic seemed to resign early, but was generally quieter than when he was struggling. He did not yell at himself or his aides or show anger in any other way. The US Open line judge was disqualified last month, making him his only other defeat in 39 games this season.

Instead, Djokovic was probably outraged at himself by swelling his cheeks, rolling his eyes, bowing his head, and lowering his shoulders, but he figured out how to counter the relentless perfection on the other side of the net. I couldn’t even do it. After exchanging once, he raised his palm to ask, “What can I do here?”

Djokovic lost his fourth 6-0 set in his 341 career grand slam match. And the other two sets are back in 2005, when he made his debut in a major tournament.

Four Djokovic supporters in blue jerseys and white baseball caps stood up and sang on the stand as they sat on the sidelines to digest the shutout of Sunday’s opening set.

The long-awaited match between these two giants in their sport was the first indoor French Open men’s final to be contested under the new cover of Court Philippe-Chatrie. The day began with a blue sky and sunshine, but eventually dark clouds gathered and it rained about 30 minutes before the scheduled start, closing the arena.

From the stand in the VIP section, the trophy La Coupe des Mousquetaires shined under a lamp that eliminated the sharp contrast of light and shadow found on the court in the autumn afternoon sun.

This was also the first French Open contest with a player walking on the court wearing a mask for a coronavirus pandemic. The reason is that the 15-day event was moved from May to June to September to October, limiting the audience to 1,000 people per day. On Sundays, mostly lucky enough people to attend were concentrated in the first 20 or so dense masses that were not too socially separated. The roof helped to amplify the cheers and roars that echoed around the enclosed space.

Perhaps because of the biased nature of most of this final, they were often silent, so I heard Djokovic peeling the plastic cover from his new racket.

The postponement caused colder and rainier weather than usual, affecting the impact of clay on the shot and slowing the bounce of the shot. As with the change to a slightly heavier tennis ball this year, there were ideas that could hinder Nadal.

That’s all.

What made Nadal go wrong in all tournaments and on this historic day?

He addressed Djokovic’s preference for drop shots, far superior to his previous 33-year-old Serbian enemy, and used expectations and speed to dim the success of his strategy.

He took five of Djokovic’s first six service games and defeated them a total of seven times.

He faced five breakpoints himself and saved four.

More than two hours later, Djokovic hired a backhand winner to take his first break on his fifth chance and reach a third in the third set. He made a few roars and shook his arms to ask the fans for more noise. ..

But it was too few and too late. It’s all over in less than 30 minutes.

Nadal was just too good, as he mostly participated in the French Open. And it was as good as anyone who had a career in Grand Slam so far.


AP tennis writer Fendrick reported from Washington. AP sports writer Leicester reported from Paris.


Other AP Tennis: https: // and

Source link

Back to top button