Boston

Marathon bomber faces revived death sentence in high court – Boston, Massachusetts

Boston, Massachusetts 2021-10-09 13:12:00 –


crime

The guilt of Jowhaar Zarnaev, who died three people in 2013, is not a problem. It’s just life imprisonment or the death penalty.

In this April 16, 2013 file photo, investigators said two blasts killed three people and more than 260 outside a forum restaurant on Boylston Street near the finish line of the 2013 Boston Marathon. I’m investigating the scene of the second bombing the day after I was injured. The Supreme Court’s allegations by the Supreme Court to revive the death penalty for the convicted Boston Marathon bomber Johar Zarnaev retain evidence from the jury that the prosecutor himself relied on in the early stages of the proceedings. It depends on that. (AP Photo / Elise Amendra, File) Associated Press

Washington (AP) —The Biden administration was convicted this week by the Boston Marathon bomber Joharzal, claiming that the jury did not need to investigate evidence that the government itself was dependent in the early stages. Attempts to persuade the Supreme Court to revive Naev’s death penalty. Of the case.

Tsarnaev’s guilt for the deaths of three people in a shocking bombing near the finish line of the 2013 marathon is not an issue for judges to hear on Wednesday.

Also, even if the federal execution is suspended and President Joe Biden calls for the abolition of the federal death penalty, courts are unlikely to ponder the government’s aggressive pursuit of a death sentence against Tsarnaev.

Instead, the main focus is that Tsarnaev’s lawyer supports the jury’s claim that his brother Tameran is the mastermind of the attack and his impressive younger brother is somehow less responsible. There is evidence that you want to hear it. Evidence suggests that Tamaranza Lunaev was involved in the killing of three people in Waltham, a suburb of Boston, on the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Last year, the United States Court of Appeals in Boston ruled that a judge had mistakenly ruled out evidence and dismissed Zarnaev’s death sentence. There is a second problem with this case. Whether the judge has done enough to ask the jury about the exposure of the bombing to widespread news coverage.

The Trump administration, which has executed 13 executions in the last six months, immediately appealed. When the new administration did not show a change of view, the court agreed to consider the case.

Tsarnaev’s lawyer has never objected to him and his brother firing two bombs near the finish line of the marathon on April 15, 2013. Christol Campbell, a 29-year-old restaurant manager from Medford. Eight-year-old Martin Richard, who was going to see a marathon with his family, was killed. More than 260 people were injured.

Sean Collier, a police officer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, was shot dead in a car during a four-day search for a bomber. Boston police officer Dennis Simmons also died a year after being injured in a confrontation with a bomber.

Police captured bloody and injured Johar Zarnaev in Watertown, a suburb of Boston. He was hiding in a boat parked in the backyard hours after his brother died. Tamerlan Tsarnaev, 26, was involved in a gun battle with the police and was run over by his brother during his flight.

Tsarnaev, now 28, has been convicted of all 30 charges against him, including plots and the use of weapons of mass destruction and the killing of Collier in an attempt to flee the Tsarnaev brothers. The Court of Appeals upheld everything except some of his convictions.

A convicted murderer who is appealing to a jury for lifelong detention rather than voting for execution has room to provide evidence that he believes is less likely to be sentenced to death.

According to defense lawyers, the 2011 killings were at the heart of their claim that Tsarnaev was deeply influenced and exacerbated by his respected brothers, who had already shown the potential for extreme violence. They said the younger brothers were less responsible for the marathon mayhem.

“Therefore, the evidence makes it very likely that Jowhaar acted under the radical influence of Tameran and Tameran led the bombing,” said Ginger Anders, a leading figure in the Supreme Court of Tsarnaev. Submitted to the High Court.

As part of that, the administration did not challenge his brother’s leadership role, claiming that the defense lawyer was able to make that claim. Nevertheless, the jury sentenced Tsarnaev to death, written by Chief of Justice Brian Fletcher.

“We chose to launch a terrorist attack on children and other innocent spectators in the marathon, and the jury held him responsible for that choice,” Fletcher wrote.

The explanation for Tameran’s involvement in the previous murder came from a friend, Ibragim Todashev, who was interviewed by investigators after the marathon attack. Todashev told authorities that Tamerlan recruited him to rob three men and they tied them up with duct tape before Tamerlan cut his throat to leave no witnesses.

With a strange twist, he was shot dead after authorities said he had attacked an agent while Toda Chef was being interrogated in Florida. The agent who killed Todashev eliminated all criminal misconduct.

Jowhaar also told a college friend that his brother was involved in the murder of Waltham and committed “jihad” there, a lawyer representing the friend told the prosecutor. No one has been charged with triple murder.

However, prosecutors said the evidence linking the killings of Tameran and Waltham was unreliable, unrelated to Jowhaar’s participation in the marathon attack, and only confused the jury. The judge who oversees the trial agreed.

Nevertheless, authorities have previously used Todashev’s statement to apply for a warrant to search Tameran’s car after the bombing, looking for blood, DNA, and other evidence related to triple murder.

After defending their credibility to obtain a warrant, Anders called the explanation of the government statement an unreliable “breathtaking face.”

The Justice Department said various standards were applied and when seeking a search warrant, federal agents did not say that all the words Todashev said were true.

The Tsarnaev court ruling will increase the likelihood of a new ruling trial that will force victims and their families to relive the horrific time if the administration wants to retry the death penalty.

Two years after the attack, the parents of the youngest victim wrote an essay printed on the cover of The Boston Globe, urging the Justice Department to abandon the pursuit of the death penalty. Dennis and Bill Richard wrote that years of complaints that left Zarnaev’s name in the news would continue to relive them with trials and prevent them from beginning to heal.

“As long as the defendant is in the limelight, we have no choice but to live the story told in his language, not us. The moment the defendant disappears from our newspapers and television screens, we live with our lives. It’s the moment to start the process of rebuilding the family, “they write.

Richer reported from Boston.



Marathon bomber faces revived death sentence in high court Source link Marathon bomber faces revived death sentence in high court

Back to top button