New Orleans

Mark Ballard: Abortion arguments in U.S. Supreme Court on the horizon | Mark Ballard – New Orleans, Louisiana

New Orleans, Louisiana 2021-09-18 19:00:00 –

Now that most people have regained power (much faster than before), Louisiana can return to more disruptive problems like abortion.

A law banning abortion has been passed in half a dozen states if a heartbeat is detected in the foetation. However, enforcement varies from state to state. For example, in Alabama, it was a crime for doctors to have an abortion. The court has suspended Alabama law for the time being.

On September 1, when the US Supreme Court refused to block it, the Texas Fetal Heartbeat Act came into force, most abortion clinics were closed, and women traveled long across state borders to end their pregnancy. Sent.

Texas accuses those who personally consider having the state government enforce the law, rather than immediately leading to court opposition, but helping the doctor to abort the person who took him to the clinic. I allowed the civilians to do that. Winners can collect up to $ 10,000 and attorneys’ fees.

Apparently, “mutual social vigilance” has become a new conservative value.

Columnist George Will, a practical conservative dean, said that when the court focused on private enforcement of the law, the Texas feint against totalitarianism would undoubtedly be a historic footnote like the Salem Witch Trials. Point out that it will be sent.

Michael Sheen Winters National Catholic Reporter Column Agree, writing a new Texas law was “to introduce a kind of vigilant justice that we all thought we would outsource to an old Western movie,” but it could be a terrible opposition to the anti-abortion movement. was.

Texas also looks away from Mississippi, who has an incident that could make abortion illegal.

Benjamin Clapper, Executive Secretary of Right to Life, Louisiana, based in New Orleans, said: “The most important thing Louisiana should pay attention to is the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs (in the Mississippi case).”

Louisiana has similar legislation to Mississippi, one prohibiting abortion after 15 weeks of gestation and the other prohibiting procedures after fetal heartbeat is detected. Louisiana will not enforce the Mississippi Act until the court decides on its constitutionality.

When their term begins on October 4, two weeks, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear Thomas E. Dobbs against the Jackson Women’s Health Organization in official positions as state health officials such as the Mississippi Department of Health. It’s a schedule. On behalf of itself and its patients, etc. The question in the High Court is “whether the ban on all feasibility of selective abortion is unconstitutional.”

The 1973 ruling and its judicial descendants, Roe v. Wade, ultimately allowed abortion with varying degrees of availability, based on the survival potential of the baby after birth. Abortion became easier in the first trimester, and in 13 weeks it became a little more difficult in the second trimester. After the third trimester, 26 weeks, the procedure was usually limited to protecting the mother’s life and serious medical condition.

In 15 weeks, the fetal heart beats, gender is identifiable, and fingers can be moved. However, the foetation cannot survive alone outside the mother’s womb until about 24 weeks of a normal 39-week gestation.

A warning bell rang for President Nancy Nosap Reproductive Rights Center When the now 6-3 conservative High Court finally accepted Dobbs after more than a dozen requests. She said in a statement: “The Supreme Court has undoubtedly violated the Supreme Court’s case for nearly 50 years and agreed to consider an abortion ban, a test case to overturn the Roe v. Wade case.”

In Louisiana, whether the Supreme Court upholds the Mississippi River, and therefore Louisiana law, or simply amends it, Prolife’s forces aim to ensure enforcement of state law, Clapper said. Roe v. Wade standard. The group reviews Texas enforcement regulations, discusses with lawmakers, and decides what to do when they reconvene on March 14 for their next regular meeting.

Clapper said he hadn’t studied enough civilian enforcement to form an opinion, but he understands why.

“For nearly fifty years, there have been many complaints about this being American law, and citizens are just dissatisfied with the court and trying to ask themselves,’What can we do in peace?’ “



Mark Ballard: Abortion arguments in U.S. Supreme Court on the horizon | Mark Ballard Source link Mark Ballard: Abortion arguments in U.S. Supreme Court on the horizon | Mark Ballard

Back to top button