Denver, Colorado 2021-02-03 08:00:51 –
Colorado court officials (including the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court) have millions of dollars in former judiciary employees who threatened to expose everything from the personal misconduct of nearly 20 judges and managers. When I signed the contract, I was trying to keep a secret. If she is fired, according to the former Chief Justice of the authorities.
Faced with a dismissal due to financial irregularities, Mindy Mathias, a former Chief of Staff of the Supreme Court Administration, was instead handed a $ 2.5 million five-year contract in March 2019. The deal was made in exchange for not submitting all-encompassing sexual discrimination. According to Christopher Ryan, Chief Justice of the State, who resigned in July 2019, the proceedings The Denver Post is investigating the deal.
The post had previously reported that Mathias was given a contract and other financial benefits despite facing a severance, but the details behind the deal are now only revealed. I did.
The threat of the proceedings is summarized in a two-page memo written for Ryan by the ministry’s then head of personnel, Eric Brown, in December 2018, spoken by judges and other ministry officials. Ryan told the post that Mathias was ready to disclose an episode of “at least 20, perhaps more” of the actions taken by.
Ryan described the actions described in the memo as “many illnesses, personal things that judges do … sexually suggestive and inappropriate behaviors … intestinal pain … behaviors that are blamed.” ..
The contract to train judges for Mathias leadership skills was revoked following the post story, with employees in at least three other departments eventually resigning. The contract was the center of state audit Although critical of the department’s finance operations, released in December 2020, the memo was not mentioned and the auditor did not say whether he knew it.
Mathias was sick in his family when the contract was signed. She took a vacation in November 2018 and learned that she would be fired due to financial concerns.
Nathan Court, then chief judge, approved the deal to keep the information private, Ryan said. Court retired on December 31, 2020 and replaced Judge Brian Boatwright.
Ryan, who oversaw the overall operation of the state’s judicial system and reported directly to the Court, said the former Chief Justice said, “… information of that nature is coming out, the branch looks bad, and it’s worth it I am very concerned about that. ” Information from being released. “
Court refused to comment on this story through a department spokesman. Mathias and Brown did not respond to emails and phone messages from the post.
“The judiciary has not publicly commented on the privileged communication between lawyers and clients and has not allowed current or former employees to do so,” the newspaper sent to the court. In response to the email, department spokesman Robert McCallum wrote in an email to the post. ..
The Department of Justice rejected repeated requests from the post office to provide notes under the court’s public records rules and claimed that it was a work product containing privileged information protected from disclosure. A post office lawyer claimed that the memo was a public record because one civil servant made it based on information obtained from another and discussed the actions of other civil servants.
Mathias’ career as the department’s HR manager and chief of its staff put her in a position to know confidential details about all employees and judges. Brown was an assistant director before becoming director of human resources.
“Brown spoke with Mathias and said she intended to sue the branch … and would bring out everything she knew about the actions of judges and other court officials throughout the state.” Ryan said. “She has been a branch fixer for the past 20 years. She essentially spilled her internal organs … just to pollute the branch.”
Ryan said he did not speak directly with Mathias or her lawyer about the memo and its contents.
Ryan said it was clear that Mathias would sue for sexism if Brown was fired. This was due to her loss of employment and the transfer of Ryan to a landing state court manager.
Ryan, a former clerk of the Department’s Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court, did not apply for the position of Chief Administrative Officer for 10 years, but the judge was unable to determine one of the two finalists. Therefore, it was tentatively appointed in July 2017. They are Mathias. Ryan was given a full administrative job in September 2017, and Mathias was appointed Chief of Staff in a newly created position.
“As part of the proceedings, she planned to reveal the information that would eventually be the content of the memo, which would cause public damage and address the issue of a man whose judiciary was in power within the branch. It shows a pattern of how she was treated or how she was. He was treated, “Ryan told Post.
After reading the notes, Ryan said he had set up a meeting with Court to discuss the next steps in the department.
Ryan did not disclose the name identified in the memo to the post, but said he was sitting in the judge for at least half. Ryan said he no longer had a copy of the note because he handed it over to Terry Morrison, the department’s chief adviser when he resigned.
He didn’t elaborate on remembering the details of the memo. Because, “I lost my job to keep my job stuck,” he refused to help disclose the details.
“This included judges, districts, counties, top-level managers, probation directors, and district courts, not lower levels,” Ryan said. .. “These included cases where the district presiding judge refused to do anything and looked away.”
Ryan said he had mentioned the memo earlier after state auditors accused him of financial irregularities that “decreased public confidence,” such as how to award the Mathias contract. The auditor did not mention the memo or the meeting with the court convened to discuss it.
“They had the opportunity to do the right thing, but they didn’t,” Ryan said of the audit and judicial department.
He said the poor money management issue that the auditor discovered was actually the one he identified and was working on fixing it when the Mathias issue became established.
“I was surprised at how it was presented,” Ryan said. “It was placed at my feet in a vacuum without talking to me. I have never done anything myself.”
Ryan reported to state auditors concerns about Macias’ departmental expenses in August 2018. Ryan was so serious that Mathias banned future travel and out-of-pocket expense reimbursement, approval of someone’s spending in the department, and signatures. Department documents including contracts — all important elements of her work.
Ryan took these steps after discovering Mathias, who “probably violated Colorado law” and “tried to circumvent” the redemption policy “by submitting modified documents.” According to the letter He dispatched an auditor at the time.
Ryan told Post that Mathias was initially to be disciplined only for episodes of redemption receipts.
“I didn’t think the court was enough to prove the fraud … but he thought we should take some action, but didn’t fire,” Ryan said. ..
The situation changed when two senior officials in the state court’s executive office, controller Myra Dukes and chief financial officer David Kribs, refused to approve regular state audits unless Mathias was dismissed. I did.
“If they don’t sign that audit, it can affect a lot of things,” Ryan told Post. “So I informed the Chief Justice, and the dismissal was what we chose to do.”
Mathias quickly took sick leave, and a few weeks later Brown “come to see me and said she was going to sue the branch,” Ryan said. He called for a meeting with Morrison the day after Christmas, and the three discussed the issue.
“We generally talked about it with Morrison, but without details, she was generally ready to reveal all this information that Mathias gathered throughout his judicial career. “Ryan said.
Referencing the text message Morrison subsequently sent, Ryan said the night after their discussion, “She was so upset, angry and unable to sleep.”
After the meeting, at Ryan’s request, Brown wrote a note outlining “everything she does,” Ryan said.
He said it was the first time Ryan had seen the range of information that Mathias had and urged him to meet with Court.
According to Ryan, the meeting took place in Court’s room between Brown Court and lawyer Andrew Rotman, an adviser to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, in early January 2019. Ryan said Brown began reading the note aloud, and when Court waved his arm to stop Brown, he was about halfway through the note.
“Court says that’s enough, he doesn’t want to hear anymore,” Ryan said. “Then he said,’What can we do about it? What are our options?”
It was then that Ryan and Brown “proposed” a judicial training contract with Mathias. According to a copy of the email reviewed by The Post, Brown had already drafted the contract and shared it with Ryan via personal email.
“The proceedings and the judiciary will eliminate the need for judges to deal with public broadcasts of many personal matters unrelated to decision-making,” Ryan told Post. “She was willing to provide all the details throughout her career to hurt the branch unless she got a softer landing. It was definitely a quid-pro-quo.”
About two weeks later, the training contract was first publicly offered, and when the company did not bid, it was fully given to the leadership practice of Mathias’ newly established company.
“I signed a Mathias contract, but keep in mind that this wasn’t a single individual business,” Ryan said. “With Chief Justice Coats … Andrew Rottman was involved in all discussions, contract language reviews, and all aspects of implementation decisions.”
December 2019, Coats and Steven Vasconcellos, The person who replaced Ryan following his resignationMathias was given a judicial training contract when Brown declared to the State Legislature’s Joint Budget Committee that her company was the only one capable of doing the job. They said Ryan approved it, but neither Court nor any other judge approved it.
Ryan said he was unsure if any of the six other members of the Supreme Court other than Court knew the memo.
Court and Bass Conceros told the legislative committee that the contract was canceled “for the public good” at Court’s direction following the post’s talk, with Ryan. Brown then resigned.
“In the last two years of my career, the signs that I suddenly became a tyrant and a villain are disgusting to me,” Ryan told Post. “I’ll make it clear. Chief Justice (Nathan) Court and Rodman know exactly why the deal was given.”
Ryan said he wasn’t working Since his resignationHe offered, “Because I was number two and to protect number one (court). My job was to protect the branch office.”
Masias given $2.5 million contract to avoid lawsuit that would have outed judges, court officials misconduct Source link Masias given $2.5 million contract to avoid lawsuit that would have outed judges, court officials misconduct