Megan, do your best at your feminist show, but can I give you some tips? | Marsagil

SFrom 2018 calculations to smarter, Hollywood’s new politics is beginning to permeate its products. We have a lot of feminist films and TV series, especially feminism set in the past: favorite, Queen’s Gambit, Little woman, Queen Mary of Scotland.. Last week, the Duchess of Sussex announced in her own Netflix series that she would “celebrate an extraordinary woman throughout history.” It’s about the adventure of a 12-year-old girl meeting a prominent woman before her time.

Of course, this is welcome, but why are some of these titles read as feminists? Instead, turning historical events into modern liberal parables often seems to result in something quite unsatisfactory, and even non-feminist. There are some classic pitfalls that Megan should be aware of.

All dramas aimed at “celebrating an extraordinary woman” tend to fall into the same hurdle. Perhaps eager to defend their protagonist, they end up with an unintended treatise that all that is really needed to overthrow patriarchy is a determined woman who considers her equal to a man. There is a possibility. (Which would rather ask the question: why didn’t the other women think about it?)

To Queen’s Gambit, A fictional story of chess genius Beth Harmon, Beth initially faces sexism (she eventually lives in the 1950s). But as soon as she demonstrates her skills, it disappears. Instead, she is favored and endorsed by her male compatriots. When she defeats the initially hostile and derogatory male champion in the early competition, he quickly becomes a respectful smile. Why are women unsuccessful in the men’s world? The answer in this drama is that if they are good enough, they will.

Saoirse Ronan as Jo March of Little Woman. Photo: Wilson Webb / Columbia / Sony / Coval / REX / Shutterstock

“They were too kind to her,” said much more modern female chess champion Judit Porgal. Said New York Times.. I remembered that her success in the game actually increased hostility from other players. “There were opponents who refused to shake hands,” she told the paper. “Some people hit their heads on the board after losing,” and this was in the 1990s.

A second relevant idea, often unknowingly endorsed, is that there is a surefire way to avoid sexism in an era of sexism. (Why did centuries-old women miss this trick?) Beth Harmon – confident and not emotional – is treated differently and therefore with respect than other girls. Let us think (for example, as a rough knowledge of the customs of the 1950s, rather than being punished for this deviation from femininity). As if to emphasize the point, other groups of women are presented as dating-crazy Simptons, which Beth is struggling to avoid.

Little womanJo March is also different from other girls. Greta Gerwig’s 2019 film was acclaimed for its feminist “alternative” ending. This revived Louisa May Alcott’s original idea that Joe would remain single at the end of the book and showed how it was rejected by the publisher. But even within Gerwig’s interpretation, there are some wishful thinking in the 21st century. Her Joe is more modern and energetic than Alcott and is rewarded with two happy endings. One meets and marries a handsome man who supports her work (unlike some of her more obedient sisters, she can have it all), and she is happy Others that are single. In a book published in 1868, Joe’s self-confidence was overwhelmed by a difficult world, she tasted unmarried loneliness, and met an unattractive man who criticized her newspaper articles as immoral, and she met them. Stop writing. She then marries him.

One of the messages of Gerwig’s film is that even in the 19th century, women’s limits were partly their fault. After all, I was able to overcome the woman with a little masculine urge. But there is an even more radical message in Alcott. Even the most enterprising women can be defeated by the social practices of her age.

The third temptation is to make it too easy for the protagonist to have an idea before time. Female characters who freely support the ideas of 21st century feminists Enora HomesVictorian England is presented as “intense” or “sexy”. “Good” characters are immediately persuaded to abandon existing philosophies, and “bad” characters react in the worst case with a very faty sexist seed-Daddy it’s almost completely benign. (But women can’t be detectives! I’ve never heard of that! Etc.).

You don’t have to go back to Victorian England to find that the treatment of candid women with feminist ideas is often quite solid. Take Megan Fox, who expressed the idea that a woman like her probably deserves better treatment on a movie set almost 10 years before the #MeToo movement. She was universally dumped in the trash – and by many men and women who later announced approval for Time’s Up and #MeToo. The director she criticized published an open letter from an anonymous crew member on his website (he deleted it). In porn, “may be a good option.” Her career was almost destroyed, which she later said.

These messages from history are important because they work to satisfy our age and mean that all roads lead to the current feminist utopia.Movies such as Queen Mary of Scotland You might enjoy vintage sexism-in the sense that modern women should be grateful for what we have-but they unknowingly say we haven’t come that far I’m betraying. Almost every man in it, Pantomime Fashion, asks if the two Queens Mary and Elizabeth are suitable for domination (are you interested in having a baby or something instead?).

On the surface, this question should seem silly, but below that, the movie agrees. In the movie Denowment, Elizabeth reveals her true reason for opposition to Mary. It’s not political. “I was jealous,” she says with tears. “Your beauty, courage, motherhood. You seem to outperform me in every way.”

Megan, do your best at your feminist show, but can I give you some tips? | Marsagil

Source link Megan, do your best at your feminist show, but can I give you some tips? | Marsagil

Back to top button