USA

Nevada Court Stands Beside Shooters in Las Vegas Mass Shooting: NPR

The October 2017 file photo released by the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Forces Investigation Team Report shows the number of guns inside a room on the 32nd floor of the Mass Shooter Stephen Paddock at the Mandalay Bay Hotel in Las Vegas.

Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Station via AP


Hide captions

Switch captions

Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Station via AP

The October 2017 file photo released by the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Forces Investigation Team Report shows the number of guns inside a room on the 32nd floor of the Mass Shooter Stephen Paddock at the Mandalay Bay Hotel in Las Vegas.

Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Station via AP

Carson City, Nevada — The Nevada Supreme Court will not be liable for the 2017 shootings on the Las Vegas Strip, as state law protects them from liability unless the weapons fail. I have decided.

The parents of a woman out of 60 who were killed in a shooting at a packed music festival filed a lawsuit against Colt Manufacturing and several other gun makers in July 2019.

According to the lawsuit, the gun company “knew that the AR-15 could be easily modified with bumpstock, so it manufactured and sold weapons designed to fire automatically, thereby banning federal and state machine guns. I violated the matter. “

Stephen Paddock used the AR-15 with bumpstock when he fired 1,049 stocks from a suite of casino resort towers into a crowd of 22,000 in just 10 minutes before killing himself. Fifty-eight people were killed in the field or in the hospital, and hundreds more were injured. Two of them died a few years later due to complications from the injury.

The Nevada Supreme Court upheld the manufacturer’s claim that Nevada law exempts them from civil lawsuits on Thursday, with only “exceptions to product liability proceedings containing design or manufacturing defects that cause firearm malfunctions.” Admitted.

“(State law) in this case, we believe will provide gun companies with immunity to allegations of tort and negligence alleged against them under Nevada law,” Judge Kristina Pickering unanimously said. I wrote in the decision.

In a lawsuit filed by Carrie Parsons’parents James and Anne-Marie Parsons in Seattle, manufacturers “recklessly against public security” by “promoting firearms as military weapons and demonstrating the ability to simply modify them.” He claimed to have shown “lack of consideration”. It said there are dozens of videos online showing people how to install bumpstock.

The proceedings were “only the question of when or not the shooter would take advantage of the ease of changing the AR-15 to fire automatically in order to significantly increase the number of bodies.” Said.

Mr. Pickering said the proceedings were based on a negligent allegation that “beyond the ability of gun companies to do the inherent harm of firearms, that is, beyond the manufacture and distribution of illegal machine guns by gun companies.”

But she said in a 20-page ruling that state law does not limit manufacturers’ immunity to “legal” firearms in particular. She states that in such cases, civil lawsuits against “any” firearm or ammunition manufacturer are not permitted.

“We never underestimate the serious public policy issues presented and the horrific tragedy of the Route 91 Harvest Festival shootings,” she wrote.

“In this case, if the firearms manufacturer and distributor are subject to civil liability in the position of a firearms company, the decision is in the legislature, not in this court,” she wrote. “We urge Congress to act if it does not mean to provide an exemption in this situation.”

Nevada Court Stands Beside Shooters in Las Vegas Mass Shooting: NPR

Source link Nevada Court Stands Beside Shooters in Las Vegas Mass Shooting: NPR

Back to top button