NM Supreme Court: Vehicle tail lamps need not be working ‘perfectly’ to comply with state law – Albuquerque, New Mexico

Albuquerque, New Mexico 2021-09-13 15:27:31 –

“This incident reminds us that not all vehicles on New Mexico’s roads and highways are in perfect condition,” C. Judge Shannon Bacon writes in his opinion to the court.

The ruling overturned the state appeals court’s ruling, and all taillights worked perfectly to meet the requirement that automobiles, trucks, trailers, and other vehicle equipment be “working and tuned.” Said it needs to be.

The Supreme Court said that as long as the vehicle’s taillights comply with certain equipment requirements of state law, they meet the more general requirement of “working properly” even if the taillights are out of light. I concluded. Multiple light bulbs. Requirements include emitting enough light to be visible from at least 500 feet.

The state legislature “established standards for automotive equipment such as lights and brakes for what it considers necessary to keep a vehicle safe, but in these sections, as the Court of Appeals concluded,” Does not require “100%” or “fully” functioning. “The judge wrote.

“Therefore, a’good working order’does not require the equipment to be 100% fully functional if it is suitable for its intended use or is functioning,” the court ruled.

The judge ordered Farish’s proceedings to be returned to the Second District Court of Justice for resolution in accordance with the Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law. Farish was convicted in the Bernarillo County Metropolitan Court. He appealed to the district court and then to the Court of Appeals.

Farish argued that his conviction should be overturned because the sheriff’s lieutenant lacked reasonable suspicion of a traffic violation to justify stopping his car, which then drunk. It led to the accusation of driving.

The Court of Appeals found inadequate evidence of conviction in the split decision under a law governing the visibility of tail lamps or another section prohibiting the operation of equipment in dangerous conditions that would endanger other drivers. I have certified that there is. However, in support of Farish’s conviction, the Court of Appeals ruled that the failed taillight violated the requirement that the vehicle’s equipment be in good working order, which is grounds for a traffic outage.

NM Supreme Court: Vehicle tail lamps need not be working ‘perfectly’ to comply with state law Source link NM Supreme Court: Vehicle tail lamps need not be working ‘perfectly’ to comply with state law

Back to top button