The Trump administration announces a new “doctrinal” that explains the core values and philosophies that guide its work in an ongoing effort to modernize the process of conformance, credentials, and security clearance decades ago. Did.
The core doctrine of federal personnel review, scheduled to be published Wednesday, comes from the Human Resources Administration and the Deputy Director of the agency, which acts as the executive body for government aptitude and qualification.
This doctrine outlines the principles and philosophies that guide the Government’s Trusted Workforce 2.0 initiative. This initiative began as an effort to resolve a very high security clearance backlog, and then evolved into a government-wide review of the personnel screening system decades ago.
According to a recent update from the Performance.gov administrator, the Security Clearance inventory is currently around 213,000. The ongoing pandemic has delayed some of the Defense and Security Agency’s ability to conduct background checks, but it is well stocked.
By managing inventories, the Trump administration is directing its efforts to modernize, and new HR review principles define the principles, processes, and policy priorities needed to advance those goals.
The administration has been teasing the publication of federal officials’ review doctrine for some time. Defense and intelligence officials, who lead personnel reviewing modernization efforts, said earlier that the government had created three policy directives to help launch the Trusted Workforce 2.0 initiative.
This doctrine was one of three policy directives planned over a year ago, as previously reported by the Federal News Network.
Other policy directives have instructed agencies to accept ongoing assessments and reviews and encouraged clearance holders to start using automatic record checks if they have not yet used them.
However, this doctrine serves as a kind of guidebook for institutions on the government’s planned efforts to rethink their thinking about establishing trust with members of the federal workforce.
“The federal government needs to effectively optimize resources, information, and technology to support the goal of a trusted workforce to carry out its business,” says the doctrine. “The HR review assesses an individual’s credibility based on core characteristics to protect people, property, information, and missions related to a particular purpose.”
According to the OPM, aptitude and security agents review the principles of personnel review every five years, and individual agencies regularly review their own policies to ensure they are also in compliance with federal goals. is needed.
“The next step is to consult with federal agencies through an inter-ministerial process to improve and begin improving and implementing policy issuance and implementation throughout the federal government, making a difference,” OPM wrote. “In the coming months, ODNI and OPM will provide a high level of direction, establish a positive and positive path, and outline some governmental steps to bridge to future conditions. We expect the institution’s policy to be issued. “
In the case of OPM, “future state” creates a “trustworthy workforce” based on “behavior, honesty, judgment, loyalty, credibility”.
The doctrine states that a successful personnel review system produces timely investigations and trust decisions, stimulating trust from the public and federal workers themselves.
Perhaps the most notable passage from the new doctrine is to enable and facilitate the movement of authorized individuals between and within federal agencies and contractors, allowing employees to enter and leave the private sector and return again. Explains the personnel review system that enables.
“Agility is enhanced by the efficient transfer of trust decisions and reciprocity between departments and institutions, and beyond the role of individuals working for the federal government or for the federal government.” And the doctrine reads.
This is a notable sea change for the government and often does not allow former federal officials to obtain security clearances when changing jobs in the private sector.
However, industry groups have argued that the Trump administration should adopt this concept in recent years. Many agencies rely on the expertise of former federal executives and contractors to carry out their missions, but are hampered by the slow investigation process that requires clearance holders to reapply for their brands. New credentials.
More mobile if federal policies describe the characteristics of “trustworthy” people, and institutions consistently apply those standards, resulting in “a unified basic trust decision across all institutions.” It is possible to accept the labor force.
Instead, OPM stated that government agencies need to apply organization or position-specific criteria relatively rarely and only when necessary. According to industry groups, government agencies often struggle with the concept of “mutualism,” and when one government agency puts its trust and grants security clearance to federal employees and contractors, most others. The same goes for government agencies.
A 2019 study by the Intelligence and National Security Alliance found that reciprocity delays were widespread across governments.
OPM doctrine details the types of information government agencies need to collect and use to make risk-based trust decisions for employees and contractors.
According to OPM, the intelligence agencies used to make trust and risk decisions about employees and contractors need to be accurate, relevant and timely. The collection process should not be overly cumbersome and should have safeguards in place to ensure that the information is protected and used properly.
These details are particularly relevant as government agencies gradually move away from the traditional routine review process and use a series of automated record checks to monitor clearance holders.
As of November, more than 2.3 million people, or about half of the cleared population, were enrolled in an ongoing assessment or review program, according to DCSA.
“Examination practitioners engage with individuals throughout the examination process to collect information, resolve derogatory information, improve transparency, and foster effective two-way communication between individuals and governments. “I will.” “Reliable insiders and governments share the responsibility of maintaining complete, accurate and relevant information as part of an individual’s personnel review record.”
OPM details the core values behind future security clearance reforms with the new policy doctrine
Source link OPM details the core values behind future security clearance reforms with the new policy doctrine