Jannah Theme License is not validated, Go to the theme options page to validate the license, You need a single license for each domain name.
USA

Publisher Judge in Lawsuit Over Internet Archive’s Online Library : NPR

Books on the shelves of the Rice University Library in Houston, April 2022.

Brandon Bell/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Brandon Bell/Getty Images


Books on the shelves of the Rice University Library in Houston, April 2022.

Brandon Bell/Getty Images

A federal judge ruled in favor of a group of book publishers suing the United States. non-commercial internet archive For scanning and lending digital copies of copyrighted books early in the coronavirus pandemic.

Four publishers – Hachette Book Group, HarperCollins, John Wiley & Sons and Penguin Random House – accuse Internet Archive of “mass copyright infringement” for lending out digital copies of books without publishers’ permission Did.

At issue is the National Emergency Library. Temporary online collection Founded in 2020, lending out digital books while brick-and-mortar libraries were closed during the COVID-19 lockdown. It operates from March 24th to June 16th of the same year.

In other online collections, the Internet Archive used to lend digital copies of books to one reader at a time, but the nonprofit suspended the National Emergency Library’s policy, allowing many readers to borrow at once. I made it possible to borrow the same book.

The Internet Archive, which aims to provide “universal access to all knowledge,” said its emergency online library was legal under the doctrine of fair use.

But on Friday, Judge John G. Keltl of the United States Court for the Southern District of New York sided with the publishers, saying the established law was on their side.

“Fundamentally, the IA’s fair use defense is that legally obtaining a copyrighted printed book does not constitute unauthorized copying and substituting for the printed book, unless the printed book is loaned at the same time. It is based on the idea of ​​giving the recipient the right to distribute to kertle said in his opinion.

“But there is no legal precedent or legal doctrine to support the idea. All authorities point in the opposite direction.”

Koeltl said the Internet Archive can scan and publish copies of books in the public domain.

writers guild, Professional organization for published authors, praised the ruling“It is not fair use to scan and loan a book without permission or compensation. It is theft and devalues ​​the author’s work.” American Publishers Association. the judgment said I reaffirmed the importance of copyright law.

internet archive said it appeals Judgment.

in the statementInternet Archive founder Brewster Kehl suggested that the judge’s opinion harms libraries, readers and authors.

“Libraries are more than the customer service arm of an enterprise database product,” says Kahle. “For democracy to thrive on a global scale, libraries must be able to maintain their historic role in the ownership, preservation and lending of books.”

The authors have previously criticized the Internet Archive, accusing nonprofits of ignoring established book lending rules and lending work without permission, thereby depriving authors of potential income.

The National Emergency Library is just one part of the Internet Archive. Internet Archive is also known as Wayback Machine, a popular website archiving service.



Summarize this content to 100 words

Books on the shelves of the Rice University Library in Houston, April 2022.

Brandon Bell/Getty Images

hide caption

toggle caption

Brandon Bell/Getty Images

Books on the shelves of the Rice University Library in Houston, April 2022.

Brandon Bell/Getty Images

A federal judge ruled in favor of a group of book publishers suing the United States. non-commercial internet archive For scanning and lending digital copies of copyrighted books early in the coronavirus pandemic. Four publishers – Hachette Book Group, HarperCollins, John Wiley & Sons and Penguin Random House – accuse Internet Archive of “mass copyright infringement” for lending out digital copies of books without publishers’ permission Did. At issue is the National Emergency Library. Temporary online collection Founded in 2020, lending out digital books while brick-and-mortar libraries were closed during the COVID-19 lockdown. It operates from March 24th to June 16th of the same year. In other online collections, the Internet Archive used to lend digital copies of books to one reader at a time, but the nonprofit suspended the National Emergency Library’s policy, allowing many readers to borrow at once. I made it possible to borrow the same book.

The Internet Archive, which aims to provide “universal access to all knowledge,” said its emergency online library was legal under the doctrine of fair use. But on Friday, Judge John G. Keltl of the United States Court for the Southern District of New York sided with the publishers, saying the established law was on their side. “Fundamentally, the IA’s fair use defense is that legally obtaining a copyrighted printed book does not constitute unauthorized copying and substituting for the printed book, unless the printed book is loaned at the same time. It is based on the idea of ​​giving the recipient the right to distribute to kertle said in his opinion.

“But there is no legal precedent or legal doctrine to support the idea. All authorities point in the opposite direction.” Koeltl said the Internet Archive can scan and publish copies of books in the public domain. writers guild, Professional organization for published authors, praised the ruling”It is not fair use to scan and loan a book without permission or compensation. It is theft and devalues ​​the author’s work.” American Publishers Association. the judgment said I reaffirmed the importance of copyright law.

internet archive said it appeals Judgment. in the statementInternet Archive founder Brewster Kehl suggested that the judge’s opinion harms libraries, readers and authors. “Libraries are more than the customer service arm of an enterprise database product,” says Kahle. “For democracy to thrive on a global scale, libraries must be able to maintain their historic role in the ownership, preservation and lending of books.”

The authors have previously criticized the Internet Archive, accusing nonprofits of ignoring established book lending rules and lending work without permission, thereby depriving authors of potential income. The National Emergency Library is just one part of the Internet Archive. Internet Archive is also known as Wayback Machine, a popular website archiving service.

https://www.npr.org/2023/03/26/1166101459/internet-archive-lawsuit-books-library-publishers Publisher Judge in Lawsuit Over Internet Archive’s Online Library : NPR

Back to top button