Pittsburgh

Pa. Republicans aim to make big election changes in constitution – Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 2021-09-27 17:08:00 –

Republicans in Pennsylvania announced on Monday a radical change in the conduct of elections through a proposed constitutional amendment. This is the latest shift in the party’s power struggle over the election, following former President Donald Trump’s unfounded allegations that last year’s presidential election was wrong against him. The Republican-written bill passed the House State Government Commission on the party line, 15-10. One provision significantly enhances Pennsylvania’s existing identification requirements for registered voters to vote both directly and by mail. Since last year’s presidential election, Republican efforts to expand voter identification requirements, limit ballot return options, and investigate voting machines, ballots, and more. Democrat Tom Wolfe vetoed a wide range of Republican bills opposed by all but one Democrat in June. Some of these controversial provisions from the GOP’s partisan bill have resulted in proposals to amend the Constitution, as the Senate Committee is preparing to consider a narrower bipartisan bill. The governor has no veto power against it. To amend the State Constitution, the proposal must pass both legislatures of the state legislature twice, once in two consecutive two-year sessions, before going to voters in a state-wide referendum. The bill could result in a referendum in the spring of 2023. The bill requires that the signature of the person voting by mail match the registered signature, and the voter must provide a government-issued ID each time before voting. Government checks, salaries, utility bills, up-to-date bank statements, and existing legal provisions permitting the use of student and employee IDs will be removed. Also, voters only need to display their ID the first time they vote in a particular constituency. Voters in the mail do not need to present a photo ID when applying for a vote or insert a copy of the ID when mailing a ballot. Another provision, noting the right to vote and no track record of direct voting fraud in Pennsylvania, makes the Secretary of State’s office, the state’s chief election officer, Ele. A cted position with a term of four years. Currently, this position is appointed by the Governor of Pennsylvania, and almost every state has a Secretary of State, three-quarters of whom have been elected. In Pennsylvania, Republicans are fiercely opposed to the appointment of Secretary of State Wolf. Interpreted state election law before and after last year’s elections. These decisions have been repeatedly supported by the court. The bill will also require a state audit president to audit the election results before certification, as Trump’s allies are pushing from state to state to “audit” last year’s presidential election. The Directorate General of Audit was established as a financial oversight body. In addition, paper ballots must have a watermark to prove their authenticity and can be “publicly inspected” after the election has been approved. Currently, paper ballots are not publicly recorded under state law. Election analysts can’t think of any state to do so, except in Georgia, which has publicly recorded images of ballots scanned this year and ordered the Secretary of State to create a pilot program to post the images. was. E. Jonathan Sebes, Chief Technology Officer of the California-based OSET Institute, said that access to ballots must be tightly controlled and access records are recorded in a secure facility to prevent tampering and catch. , Observation, video recording should be done. According to Sebes, he is devoted to research on election infrastructure and management, but even if ballots are posted online, they can be tampered with. Self is a sign of credibility and it may not be possible to vote on each ballot. For example, foreign and military voters can print their ballots. Audrey Line, head of national policy for the Washington-based Home Institute’s national vote, said she had never actually seen a ballot watermark and her organization did not consider it the best. Said. According to Klein, it’s mostly expensive, so practice. In any case, it’s difficult to forge the style of ballots.

Republicans in Pennsylvania announced on Monday a radical change in the conduct of elections through a proposed constitutional amendment. Partisan power struggle over elections Former President Donald Trump Unfounded claim Last year’s presidential election was fraudulent against him.

The Republican-written bill passed the House State Government Commission on the party line, 15-10. One provision significantly enhances Pennsylvania’s existing identification requirements for registered voters to vote both directly and by mail.

The just-announced wording includes months of party fights during the Pennsylvania election law debate or over the gray area, as well as increased voter identification requirements from last year’s presidential elections, restrictions on ballot return options, and voting. It is in the midst of Republican efforts to investigate opportunities, ballots, etc. selection.

June Democratic Governor Tom Wolf Rejected a wide range of Republican bills It was opposed by all but one Democrat. As the Senate Committee prepares to consider a narrower bipartisan bill, some of those controversial provisions from the Republican party bill have resulted in proposals to amend the Constitution.

The governor has no veto power against it.

To amend the State Constitution, you must pass both parliaments twice and once in two consecutive sessions before voting for voters in a state-wide referendum. The referendum is most likely to take place in the spring of 2023.

The bill requires that the signature of the person voting by mail match the registered signature, and that a government-issued ID must be provided each time before voting.

This removes current government checks, salaries, utility bills, bank statements, and existing legal provisions that allow the use of student and employee IDs.

Also, voters only need to show their ID the first time they vote in a particular constituency. On the other hand, mailed voters do not need to provide a photo ID when applying for ballots or insert a copy of the ID when mailing to ballots.

Democrats have vehemently opposed strengthening the Voter ID Act, calling it an effort to deprive them of voting rights, noting that they have no track record of direct voting fraud in Pennsylvania.

Another provision would change the position of Secretary of State, the state’s chief election officer, to a position elected for a four-year term. Current, Position is the appointment of the Governor of Pennsylvania..

Almost every state has a Secretary of State, whose position is three-quarters of the jobs elected.

In Pennsylvania, Republican lawmakers are fiercely opposed to how Wolf-appointed Secretary of State interpreted the state’s election law before and after last year’s elections. These decisions have been repeatedly supported by the courts.

NS Trump ally promotes “audit” from state to state In last year’s presidential election, the bill will also require that election results be audited by the state’s chief auditor before certification. The Directorate General of Audit was established as a financial oversight body.

In addition, paper ballots must have a watermark to prove their authenticity and can be “publicly inspected” after the election is approved.

Currently, state law does not make paper ballots a public record, so election analysts have made public records of images of ballots scanned this year, with the exception of Georgia, which ordered the Secretary of State to create a pilot program. I couldn’t think of a state to publish a paper ballot. Please post an image.

If you intend to allow physical access to ballots, record access, observe, and video record in a secure facility to prevent and capture tampering, and ensure such access. You need to manage it. The California-based OSET Institute is dedicated to research on election infrastructure and management.

Still, even if the ballot image was posted online, it could be tampered with, Sebeš said.

Watermarks, on the other hand, are not authentic in their own right and may not be included in each ballot, he said. For example, foreign and military voters can print their ballots.

Audrey Kline, head of national policy at the Washington-based National Vote at Home Institute, considers it a best practice because she has never actually seen a ballot watermark and is largely costly. Said not.

In any case, Klein said it’s difficult to forge the style of ballots.

Pa. Republicans aim to make big election changes in constitution Source link Pa. Republicans aim to make big election changes in constitution

Back to top button