Oklahoma City

Pardon and Parole Bd recommends commutation of Julius Jones’ sentence – Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 2021-09-13 18:17:55 –

Oklahoma City (Free press) — The Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board (PPB) met on Monday to hear the pros and cons of Julius Jones’ death sentence commute.

The long-awaited PPB meeting brought together a crowd of Jones supporters and Paul Howell’s family and friends, who were accused of being killed.

After a difficult three-and-a-half-hour meeting, the PPB voted 3-1 in a single counter-argument to encourage Governor Kevin Stitt to relocate.

Before the vote took place, the meeting had three segments.

  • First, the victim’s family was given 30 minutes to make a prepared comment.
  • Then the District Attorney’s Office, a man of Prosecutor Sandy Elliott, was given 30 minutes to oppose the commutation.
  • Finally, a delegation on behalf of Mr Jones was given 30 minutes to claim a commutation.

Marty Piercy reports local government

family

Members of the Howell family first spoke to the board. Howell’s sister, two brothers, and one of his daughters spoke in turn, and the other family and friends were sitting behind them.

Howell’s sister, Toby, was the only reliable witness to Howell’s shooting. Her shooter’s explanation has been questioned many times.

In her explanation to the police, she said the shooter was wearing a stocking hat and his hair was sticking out a few inches below the hat. According to Jones’ lawyer, the photo of Jones just before the crime and the photo of Jones at the time of booking show that he has very finely cut hair.

Toby claims to have received a letter from Jones requesting a change in his testimony. She also said that other Jones supporters had contacted her and pressured her to change her testimony.

Toby said he was afraid of what Jones would do to her if he was allowed to leave prison.

Each of Howell’s family members who spoke said they were convinced that the right person had been sentenced to death for the murder of their loved one.

District attorney’s actions

Sandier Riot was a prosecutor at the Jones Trial 20 years ago. She was still at the Oklahoma County District Law Office and represented the office at a hearing on Monday.

Earlier, DA David Prater in Oklahoma County would even write guest editorials for two Oklahoma City-based legacy newspapers, Oklahoma, to force board members Adam Luck and Kelley Doyle to stop hearing the case. It was made.

The Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled against Prater last week. Another allegation has been filed to force Scott Williams to refuse. At the meeting on Monday, Williams chose to refuse “with great care” to avoid the emergence of wrongdoing.

DA claim

Elliott urged the board not to punish the Howell family’s actions. This means that commutation will somehow “punish” the victim’s family.

Elliott then considered a variety of reasons Jones defenders cited as reasons for commuting to work.

The Jones family claims that Julius is at home, having a supper and playing games on the night of the murder. His alibi has never been raised by a public defender in Jones’ trial.

Elliott claims it wasn’t raised because it wasn’t a reliable alibi. According to Elliott, Jones told his girlfriend at the time that he wasn’t at home on the night of the crime.

Elliott also shared many of the allegations made by Christopher Jordan, a conspirator to Jones. Many of the proceedings against Jones were based on the strength of the testimony from Jordan.

Jordan was sentenced lighter than Jones and allegedly sentenced to 15 years in prison for theft of Mr Howell’s car.

While in prison, several witnesses came forward to testify that Jordan claimed responsibility for the murder. Elliott claimed that these witnesses were unreliable. She quoted records of the felony of those witnesses and made false allegations that Jones’ supporters motivated witnesses to make these claims.

Elliott argued that “racism” had been triggered, without which the clear waters of the case would be muddy.

She animalized Jones and explained that she and the police were wandering around to commit a crime overnight, citing an incident that she and the police had assumed waiting for Jones to put someone in a mug at an ATM. .. To be clear, the robbery never happened.

defense

Amanda Bas, one of Jones’ lawyers, addressed the board in the next segment of the meeting.

Mr. Bass said the prosecution did not talk about Mr. Jones’ case as much as he talked about Mr. Jones’ “suffering” at a hearing on Monday.

Bass cleverly discussed inadequate or incompetent expressions in Jones’ first trial. Both public defenders in that case signed an affidavit saying they were afraid of the case. According to Bass, this was the first uppercase case in both cases.

Jones’ lawyers did not call any witnesses in the first trial, including Mr Jones himself.

Bass also talked about a DNA sample taken from a red bandana found in Jones’ house. She claimed that the prosecutor claimed that the DNA was in direct agreement with Jones, but said the FBI criteria required eight genetic markers in the DNA sample to store in the database. The DNA used in Jones’ trial had only 5-7 genetic markers.

Bass claimed that Jordan’s testimony was unreliable because he had everything he could get by fixing Jordan’s accusations.

Bass claimed that the prosecutor had told Jordan that he had a video of stealing a car with Hideaway Pizza, and that if he did not cooperate, they would prosecute him for the robbery. Elliott had previously claimed that Jones was responsible for these robbers, but there is no evidence of that claim.

Bass also explained that one of the state’s witnesses to Jones was also an important witness to the other two prosecutors who were later dismissed, raising serious concerns about his credibility and prosecutors.

Bass concludes by saying that our system often makes mistakes.

Senator George Young and Kelly Masters, lawyers and sports agents, each talked about Jones on an individual level before the board took a 15-minute break.

vote

President Adam Luck explained to attendees that there were too many questions in this case. Finally, luck said he had too much suspicion of this literal life-and-death situation. So he voted “yes” to the death-to-life commute.

Larry Morris agreed with Luck’s opinion and said he voted in favor as well.

Kelly Doyle agrees with good luck, and science agrees that the 19-year-old brain (the age of Jones at the time of Howell’s murder) is not yet fully developed and allows someone to die for their actions. He added that he couldn’t. They may or may not have taken it when they were very young. She also voted in favor.

Richard Smosamon pointed out that his vote was meaningless and later expressed concern about setting a precedent within the board. He voted against it.

He didn’t comment or vote because Scott Williams refused.

With a 3-1 vote, a board recommendation to commutate Jones’s sentence was sent to the governor, who finalized whether Jones would be executed or his sentence would be commuted to life imprisonment. Has the right to make decisions.

There is no statutory deadline for the governor to make a decision. There is no execution date, so even if the governor makes a public decision, there is no way to guess how long it will take for the governor to announce the decision.


Last updated: September 13, 2021 17:17 Brett Dickerson – Editor

Pardon and Parole Bd recommends commutation of Julius Jones’ sentence Source link Pardon and Parole Bd recommends commutation of Julius Jones’ sentence

Back to top button