USA

Parliament, employee group intensifies pressure to thwart Schedule F enforcement orders

As the president’s transition is underway and the next government funding deadline is approaching, members of the House of Representatives and a group of federal employees are looking for ways to thwart the executive order of the president’s recent Schedule F. I will.

More than 12 members of the House of Representatives, including majority leader Stennie Heuer (D-Md.) And Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), Chairman of the Surveillance and Reform Government Steering Subcommittee, have asked parliamentarians to spend the next bill. I’m asking you to block the order. In any form the law takes.

“We are very demanding that future ongoing resolutions or comprehensive expenditure bills include language that overturns the enforcement of this Executive Order and demands the immediate return of federal officials reclassified accordingly. “I am urgently writing,” said a member of the House and Senate Expenditure Committee leaders who wrote in a letter on Tuesday.

An enforcement order signed by President Donald Trump last month gives agency managers the power to reclassify certain confidential, policy-making, decision-making, or advocacy positions from career competition services into a new class of exception services known as Schedule F. Give.

The latest petition from House Democrats comes when government agencies have reached a 90-day deadline to identify their policy-making position and submit a list to the Human Resources Department.

At least one agency has already completed its initial review and has submitted to OPM a list detailing the positions it wants to reclassify.

A spokesman for the Administration and Budget Department submitted a list of positions to the OPM for review by the Administration and Budget Office, but the number of roles identified for reclassification and the political appointment of Schedule C made the list. He said he didn’t elaborate on whether he did.

RealClearPolitics, reported over the weekend, identified 425 positions (88% of agency employees) as candidates for reclassification to Schedule F by the OMB.

Tuesday’s OPM did not provide details on the number of institutions that have so far filed Schedule F reclassification petitions.

A coalition of good government groups and federal employee associations has made similar plea to Congressional budgeters for the Executive Order of Schedule F. They said that failing to block the EO creates a “substantial and imminent risk.”

“The need for Congress to act is urgent, especially as we are in the midst of a transition,” said the coalition, which includes the Civil Service Partnership, Senior Executives Association, National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association (NARFE) Association, on Monday. In a letter to Congressional budgeters I wrote in. “Failure to act sets a dangerous precedent, indicating that parliamentary indifference can lead to a significant expansion of executive branch.”

The coalition also includes the Federal Administrators Association, Project On Government Oversight, and the Volcker Alliance.

Democrats in the House of Representatives, good government groups, and federal employee organizations are all united in concerns about the Executive Order of Schedule F.

They fear that EO will bring “widespread and disturbing changes” to the federal career workforce in the weeks leading up to the next presidential transition.

And they are concerned that government agencies can use executive orders to dig deeper into political appointees by quickly reclassifying their work from one administration to the next as Schedule F positions. doing.

Connolly and Carolyn Maloney (DN.Y.), Chairman of the House Oversight and Reform Commission, sought help from the Government Accountability Office to track how government agencies are currently implementing Schedule F orders. It was.

Together with Senate Department of Homeland Security and Government Affairs ranking members Gary Peters (Democratic) and Tom Carper (Democrat), they called on GAO to hold regular briefings from now until mid-February.

“Executive orders trigger a major escape from the federal government at the end of every presidential administration, giving federal agencies deep institutional knowledge, expertise, experience, and the ability to develop and implement long-term policy strategies. It may not be possible, “said Congressman in a letter to Congressman General Jean Dodaro on Monday. “It will be a serious loss for Americans.”

Nearly 40 of Peters and his colleagues last week introduced a law that simply invalidates Schedule FEO. A separate bill from Maloney, Connolly, and Heuer seeks to provide additional protection to federal career employees who may lose their jobs on Schedule F orders.

Specifically, members of the House of Representatives and the Senate are interested in which agency requested the Human Resources Department to reclassify to Schedule F. We are also interested in the number and types of positions the institution is trying to reclassify, as well as the details of the OPM process. He approved these positions for the new schedule.

Hoyer and his Democratic colleagues could be forced by government agencies to classify and then reclassify thousands of federal employees if the next Biden administration abolishes all or part of the order. Therefore, he explained that the current attempt to implement Scheduled FEO is a waste of time and resources.

Partnerships for public services and other good government groups have agreed.

“Even if EO is canceled, canceling Schedule F hiring behavior may not be an easy process,” they write. “Unless revoked, the ambiguity of the order will not leave a guardrail to ensure nonpartisan employment, promotion, dismissal, or other personnel actions.”



Parliament, employee group intensifies pressure to thwart Schedule F enforcement orders

Source link Parliament, employee group intensifies pressure to thwart Schedule F enforcement orders

Back to top button