New Orleans

President Biden seems likely to extend US troop presence in Afghanistan – New Orleans, Louisiana

New Orleans, Louisiana 2021-04-08 03:54:00 –

President Joe Biden seems ready to get past the May 1 deadline to complete the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan without saying it right away. An orderly withdrawal takes time, and Biden runs out of it. Biden is very close to the deadline, and his decision is roughly equal to the decision to postpone the withdrawal of the remaining 2,500 troops for at least a few months. Support Afghan troops at risk of Taliban repulsion. As Biden himself suggested in late March, removing all troops and their equipment in the next three weeks will be logistically difficult, along with coalition partners who cannot escape on their own. The deadline for May 1st is “. “It’s hard to get rid of those troops just for tactical reasons,” he added, “and if we leave, we’ll do so in a safe and orderly way.” Former Admiral James Stabidis, who was NATO’s commander-in-chief from 2009 to 2013, said in an email exchange Wednesday that Stabidis said, “It may be decided not to make a decision. This is 5 It seems to be the deadline on the 1st of the month. ” “The most cautious course of action feels like a six-month extension and an attempt to ensure that the Taliban truly meet their promises. In essence, a legitimate” conditional “withdrawal in the fall. Allow. Biden has a cross current of pressure. On the other hand, he said that for many years, Afghanistan would be better treated as a small anti-terrorism mission, including when President Barack Obama ordered a major expansion of the U.S. military, including during his time as Vice President. I have insisted. Since then, opposition to Russia and China has emerged as a higher priority, while current and former army officers say the Taliban is in a relatively strong position and the Afghan government is vulnerable. Leaving now claims that there is a risk of losing “withdrawal not only leaves the United States more vulnerable to the threat of terrorism, but also has a devastating effect on Afghanistan and its territories, It will not benefit key stakeholders, including it. The Taliban, a bipartisan expert group known as the Afghan Research Group, concluded with a February report. Former co-chairman Joseph Dunford The group, a former commander of the U.S. military in Afghanistan and a former chairman of the Integrated Chiefs of Staff, recommended that Byden extend the deadline beyond May and, preferably with some Taliban agreement. If the troops stay, Afghanistan will be in the war in Byden. His decision is now and in the coming months, the 2001 US invasion designed in response to the Taliban’s September 11 attack. In this attack, a militant group led by Osamabin Ladin used Afghanistan as a shelter. During the 2020 campaign, if he was elected, anti-terrorism forces in Afghanistan. He said he would “responsibly end the war” so that the US military would never have to return. Peace talks between the Taliban and the Afghan government, which began last fall, are seen as the best hope, but have had little success so far. Postponing the withdrawal of the United States risks the Taliban resuming attacks on the US and Allied forces, resulting in a war. In a February 2020 agreement with President Donald Trump’s administration, Tulliburn stopped such attacks and negotiated peace with the Afghan government in exchange for a US commitment to withdraw completely by May 2021. Agreed to do. Shadows of US Withdrawal When entering the White House in January, Biden knew of the impending deadline and had time to meet it if he chose to do so. It became a sudden logistical hurdle simply because he postponed the decision to support long-term consultations within the administration and with allies. Under the potential threat of Taliban resistance, it is not technically impossible to fly thousands of troops and their equipment from Afghanistan in the next three weeks, but Biden violates his promise not to hurry. Looks like it is. Biden reviewed the February 2020 agreement shortly after taking office, saying Tuesday’s aide was still thinking about moving forward in Afghanistan. White House spokesman Jen Psaki emphasized that May 1 is a deadline set by the previous administration and the decision is complex. “But that’s also an important decision. He needs to be in close consultation with our allies and national security. This administration’s team,” he said. “And we want to give him time to do that.” In a briefing on Afghanistan, Biden publicly and repeatedly said that the Taliban was not a military like General Frank Mackenzie, the head of the U.S. Central Command. You would have heard from the commander. The February 2020 agreement fully fulfilled their promises. Mackenzie et al. State that the level of violence is too high to provide a lasting political solution. Congress is cautious about reducing the US military presence in Afghanistan. Last year, the Pentagon explicitly banned the use of funds to reduce troops of less than 4,000, but after Trump lost the election and ordered a reduction to 2,500, the Pentagon Anyway, I went ahead. Trump circumvented the legal ban by signing a waiver.

President Joe Biden seems ready to get past the May 1 deadline to complete the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan without saying it right away. An orderly drawer takes time, and Biden runs out of it.

Biden was so close to the deadline that his decision was mostly to postpone the withdrawal of the remaining 2,500 troops for at least a few months and continue to support Afghan troops at the risk of the Taliban’s backlash. equal. As Biden himself suggested in late March, removing all troops and their equipment in the next three weeks will be logistically difficult, along with coalition partners who cannot escape on their own.

“It will be difficult to meet the May 1 deadline,” he said. “It’s hard to get rid of those troops just for tactical reasons,” he added, “and if we leave, we’ll do so in a safe and orderly way.”

Former Admiral James Stavidis, who was NATO’s commander-in-chief from 2009 to 2013, said it was unwise to escape immediately at this point.

“It can be decided not to make a decision, which seems to be the May 1 deadline,” Stabidis said in an email exchange on Wednesday. “The most cautious course of action feels like a six-month extension and an attempt to ensure that the Taliban truly meet their promises. In essence, a legitimate” conditional “withdrawal in the fall. Allow. “

Biden has a cross current of pressure. On the other hand, he said that for many years, Afghanistan would be better treated as a small anti-terrorism mission, including when President Barack Obama ordered a major expansion of the U.S. military, including during his time as Vice President. I have insisted. Since then, the opposition to Russia and China has emerged as a higher priority.

Meanwhile, current and former Army officers argue that leaving the Taliban in a relatively strong position and the Afghan government vulnerable is at risk of losing what it has gained in 20 years of combat. are doing.

“The withdrawal will not only make the United States more vulnerable to the threat of terrorism, but will also have a devastating effect on Afghanistan and the region and will not benefit key stakeholders, including the Taliban,” bipartisan. The Afghanistan Study Group closed with a February report. The group, co-chaired and retired General Joseph Dunford, former commander of the U.S. military in Afghanistan and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, recommended that Biden extend the deadline beyond May.

If the army stays, Afghanistan will be in Biden’s war. His decision, now and in the coming months, could determine the legacy of the 2001 US aggression designed in response to al-Qaeda’s September 11 attack, a militant led by Osama Bin Laden. The group used Afghanistan as a shelter.

Biden could maintain anti-terrorism forces in Afghanistan if elected during the 2020 campaign, but said he would “responsibly end the war” so that the U.S. military would never have to return. Stated. Peace talks between the Taliban and the Afghan government, which began last fall, are seen as the best hope, but have had little success so far.

Postponing the withdrawal of the United States carries the risk that the Taliban could resume attacks on the United States and the Allies, exacerbating the war. In a February 2020 agreement with the Donald Trump administration, the Taliban will stop such attacks and negotiate peace with the Afghan government in exchange for the U.S. commitment to a complete withdrawal by May 2021. Agreed to.

Related File Video: Taliban Violence Overshadows US Withdrawal

When he entered the White House in January, Biden knew the impending deadline and had time to meet it if he chose to do so. It became a sudden logistical hurdle simply because he postponed the decision to support long-term consultations within the administration and with allies. Under the potential threat of Taliban resistance, it is not technically impossible to fly thousands of troops and their equipment from Afghanistan in the next three weeks, but Biden violates his promise not to hurry. Looks like it is.

Biden reviewed the February 2020 agreement shortly after taking office, saying Tuesday’s aide was still thinking about moving forward in Afghanistan. White House spokesman Jen Psaki emphasized that May 1 is a deadline set by the previous administration and the decision is complex.

“But that’s also an important decision, and he needs to be in close consultation with our allies and the national security team of this administration,” said Mr. Pusaki. “And we want to give him time to do it.”

At a briefing on Afghanistan, Biden had heard from military commanders such as General Frank Mackenzie of the U.S. Central Army, who publicly reiterated that the Taliban had not fully fulfilled the promises made in the February 2020 agreement. Let’s go. Mackenzie et al. State that the level of violence is too high to provide a lasting political solution.

Congress was cautious about reducing the US military presence in Afghanistan. Last year, the Pentagon explicitly banned the use of funds to reduce troops of less than 4,000, but after Trump lost the election and ordered a reduction to 2,500, the Pentagon Anyway, I went ahead. Trump circumvented the legal ban by signing a waiver.

President Biden seems likely to extend US troop presence in Afghanistan Source link President Biden seems likely to extend US troop presence in Afghanistan

Back to top button